SB Tactical SBA3 ar pistol brace, opinions please

[ohell]

I’ve become a fan of ar pistols and like the option we have today with braces. I’d like to pick up a SB Tactical SBA3 which uses a standard six position buffer tube.  With rifle stocks available in the collection is this version so close to the line it could be trouble?  I don’t see anything that prohibits swapping the brace for standard stock or stoping the claim of constructive intent / constructive possession if we loose any more ground on the 2a front.   Really don’t want to be on a form 1 list but maybe it’s time or just be content with braces that use pistol buffer tube / proprietary tubes. 

Anyone else had second thoughts about this brace?

[DaveTN]

http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2017/04/foghorn/atf-its-legal-to-shoulder-an-ar-15-pistol-equipped-with-an-sb-tactical-arm-brace/

 

[ohell]

Thanks. It isn’t a shouldering or brace mod question. More of an intent to construct interpretation question if for some unlucky reason the opportunity presented itself. 

The SBA3 uses a standard rifle six position commercial spec buffer tube. Slide off brace and a stock could be slid right on with consequences on a non form1 lower. Heck,  A para cord wrap takes more time to undo. I think I’ll avoid and keep using pistol tube or proprietary tube models. I was not comfortable with para cord wrap option in the world we live in today. The comfort vs weight option on this one is enticing...,,

[gjohnsoniv]

Ultimately I'd guess if they were trying to get you on that then they have a laundry list of other charges on you.  If you don't have a spare rifle stock on you or in your possession I can't see how they could call it constructive intent, they approved the thing regardless. (Though we all know that can change like the wind)