Ruger Secuirty 9 and LCP II question

[tercel89]

Hello members , sorry to ramble on here as of lately , I have been making quite a few topics since I'm stuck home with my little one that is sick with the flu. Thank God she is getting better. Anyways ,  I hear a lot of people moaning over the Security 9's manual safety . I don't like it either since I am a long time Glock owner and I like things as simple as they can be. My question is this : Why do people complain about the Security 9 having a manual safety but they seem to be fine with the LCP II even though it does not have a manual safety ?
 I think they are almost the same and are both hammer fired .
 Again , I like guns with no manual safety but I never hear people complain about the LCP II not having one. Am I missing something ?

Edited February 19, 2018 by tercel89

[Steelharp]

Just don't engage the safety. Problem solved.

[tercel89]

32 minutes ago, Steelharp said:

Just don't engage the safety. Problem solved.

Oh I agree , I just don't see why people are not saying anything about the LCP II .

[Steelharp]

29 minutes ago, tercel89 said:

Oh I agree , I just don't see why people are not saying anything about the LCP II .

Seems like most complainers are vocal about things that are there than things that aren't.

[tercel89]

34 minutes ago, Steelharp said:

Seems like most complainers are vocal about things that are there than things that aren't.

Yep . I wont let the safety keep me from getting it. On my older Shield it had the manual safety. I only used it once just to see if it worked , then I never used it again.