Megyn Leaving FOX

[JReedEsq]

The title of this thread is a total letdown.  After the hectic day I have had, I thought it was about Megan Fox.  What a bummer...

 

[peejman]

21 minutes ago, JReedEsq said:

The title of this thread is a total letdown.  After the hectic day I have had, I thought it was about Megan Fox.  What a bummer...

 

Meh, Kelly is way hotter than Fox. 

[Oh Shoot]

2 hours ago, Mark A said:

[re Greta Van Susteren] You need to google why she left and the 20 million settlement she got from it...

Greta got no settlement, there was no lawsuit.

You have her confused with Gretchen Carlson.

- OS

Edited January 4, 2017 by Oh Shoot

[Mark A]

1 minute ago, Oh Shoot said:

Greta got no settlement, there was no lawsuit.

You have her confused with Gretchen Carlson.

- OS

oops...my bad

[mikegideon]

3 hours ago, SWJewellTN said:

Everyone? I don't think so.

Nope. Fox is overflowing with good looking women. Megyn isn't my favorite. I like her, inspite of her political leanings. Smart girl.

[Fourtyfive]

Robin Meade ......

[kieefer]

Tucker Carlson is replacing her so says Drudge. I bet Sean is pissed.

[Oh Shoot]

2 hours ago, kieefer said:

Tucker Carlson is replacing her so says Drudge. I bet Sean is pissed.

Hell, he just recently replaced Britt Hume as full time replacement for Greta, so somebody will have to replace him in his first replacement role.

- OS

 

[Dustbuster]

As long as we have strip clubs, and hot female attorneys who quit working bs cases for big firms, fox will have an endless pool to pick (or fish) from..

( Motley Crue girls girls girls playing in background)

[Spiffy]

I never got the concept of hearing some random persons views on the story in the news.  Just sit there and read the facts and don't interject your opinion of what happened.

[Oh Shoot]

14 minutes ago, Spiffy said:

I never got the concept of hearing some random persons views on the story in the news.  Just sit there and read the facts and don't interject your opinion of what happened.

Commentary/editorial/research content has been part of the "news" since 1700 in the US.

At any rate, you certainly couldn't fill 168 hours/week with only the "undisputed facts", especially since so many of the news makers are so committed to hiding them.

- OS

[gun sane]

There's a clear difference between objective reporting (facts only) and editorializing (commentary).  Much of what is called commentary today is propaganda.