Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'denial of coverage'.
Found 1 result
-
Hey all, Lately, there have been some discussions floating around the internet discussing the denial of service by self defense insurance companies. I know USCCA was most recently in that hot seat. I was wondering if anyone has any thoughts on CCW Safe. I heard the head attorney for Attorneys on Retainer go over their contract and it sounds like there are just as many options for CCW Safe to deny you coverage. This seems a bit scary since if you did ever have to defend yourself, then defend yourself in court, most likely you'll be fighting some kind of criminal charge in the court case, that's where they decide if it was a self defense act. We'll, if you're being charged, does that give CCW Safe the option to not cover you? Seems like the Attorneys on Retainer don't have this problem. Or if you're carrying somewhere a school activity is going on, elsewhere in the park you're at, and you're not aware, technically you shouldn't be carrying at all, would CCW Safe deny coverage, since technically you weren't allowed to carry, it looks like that's what their contact says. I'd be curious to see if anyone has any opinions about the potential for denial of service vs something like Attorneys on Retainer, which is an actual law firm, not insurance company. Or is all the Attorney on Retainer stuff just meant to generate fear of the insurance companies meant to drive business to them?