TNcitizen22

I just picked up a 92A1 the other day. It is a fantastic firearm, along with the rest of the series. Already I have put 250 rounds through it, without a hiccup of any kind. Don't let some asshat tell you its a poor choice.

Thanks for the link on the grips. I do agree, they look pretty good. I especially like the checkered model.

Howdy everyone, I just now got around to showing off the best present I have ever got (from Santa or otherwise). My parents picked me up a Ruger Super Blackhawk in .44 magnum, stainless, 4 & 5/8s, unfluted cylinder as a graduation present. To say that I am ecstatic is does not even come close. I had been looking at one of these for a while as a woods / hiking / "I own a .44 magnum" gun, and I must say, it fits the bill nicely. Since I got it I have done a trigger job and installed a wilson combat spring kit in it. The gun is now buttery smooth. I have also done a little bit of polishing on the exterior. Not much, I did not want it mirrored, but I wanted it cleaned up a bit. I love the wood grips it came with, but for bumming around the woods, and especially hiking, I really did not want to scratch them up. To that end, I installed some Pachmayr Presentation grips. Fit and finish on them is alright. They do help with recoil some, but they are nothing to write home about. I am probably going to pick up some Hogue grips for it to try out. I have to say, recoil in general is very different from the Smith 629 I have used in the past. Such is the nature of single actions I suppose. After a bit of practice though, it is getting easier to handle. Note: The metal below the cylinder is not damaged. I blended in the serial number (digitally) a bit to quickly, so it looks a little... warped.

I will probably just purchase it with Sig nightsights unless someone can give me a good reason to go with aftermarkets?

Hey everyone, I have been considering switching my EDC handgun to a Sig P229 from a Glock 27. I have been a Glock shooter most of my life, and have a good deal of proficiency with them, and thought that was all I would ever be interested in carrying. That is, until I shot a P226 the other day. As I said, this gun would be for carry, mostly IWB but occasionally OWB. I would want it in .40S&W. My question here is between to models, the 229R (railed) or the 229SAS. Anyone have an opinion on which carries better, if such a difference exists? Pros and cons between the two models? General opinions of the 229? I am leaning toward the 229R for the versatility of the rail, however I really like the smooth lines of the 229SAS.

I will run by tomorrow or give him a call. I totally forgot that cars are his line of work. He is an excellent guy to deal with. Thanks for the pointer fellas!

Howdy everyone, I am taking my girlfriend car shopping tomorrow in Knoxville. Long story short, she was in an accident (not her fault) and insurance has paid out, but we need to get her a car fast. I am not really up to speed on the used market in Knoxville (and surrounding areas) as to who is reputable, and who isn't. I realize I am dealing with used car lots here, but I am trying to get her the best deal with the least BS. We are looking for a vehicle around $6500, preferably a 2 or 4 door car that gets decent gas mileage FWIW. So, does anyone have any advice for places to check? She is thinking Ole' Ben Franklin. I have heard both good and bad things, so I am skeptical.

Check out Hickok45 on YouTube. He does some pretty good comparisons of these guns, with special attention to their dimensions that will answer your question.

Thanks for the help all. I finally figured it out! It was just a startling thing to see on a new gun!

Howdy all! I just came home with a brand new Glock 36 in OD, a gun that I have wanted for quite a while. However, it has rapidly lost its luster, here's why: http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz179/kpricheson/004-2.jpg http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz179/kpricheson/003-1.jpg http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz179/kpricheson/002-1.jpg http://i825.photobucket.com/albums/zz179/kpricheson/001-1.jpg It looks to me like the trigger bar has a huge dent in it, unless I am crazy. It is pronounced enough that when I take the gun apart and go to put it back together, it is difficult to get the slide back onto the frame. Also, the metal spike (dont know the term) coming out of the trigger assembly housing has a serious 'S'-bend in it, but I think that is more on the normal side for a 36. What do you all think? Assuming this is a defect, I have two options. I bought it through Davidsons, so I can send it back to them for repair/replacement. If they replace it, it will be with a black model as they no longer have the OD, which is ok, just not exactly what I wanted. Or I can send it to Glock. Anyone have any idea which way I should go. I have never had to deal with either.

Just left work in Turkey Creek, its a solid sheet of ice. I saw 4 wrecks before I got to I-40.

For me it would depend. If you can get a 442/642 pre-lock then I would without a doubt go that route. The S&W is a bit smaller package, and has been around for quite a while. Many people hate on the triggers. I expect they have only ever snapped them in passing while at the local gunshop. A good bit of dry-firing, a quick trigger job, cleaning, lubrication, and you have one smooth trigger. You can lighten it a bit by switching out the rebound spring and you have yourself a nice, and reliable pistol. However, since the addition of the internal lock to pretty much every newly produced revolver, I will not touch them, especially in a revolver meant for carry. While the odds of it seizing up on you when you need your gun the most are very remote, why risk it? A revolver is built to work. You have five shots, guaranteed. The last thing I want is some variable thrown into it that may screw it up when TSHTF. That being said, if you cannot find a pre-lock version, or are not really interested, then both guns are excellent. Personally, I would still go Smith because the 442/642 design is time tested. However, the LCR is lighter (and slightly larger), and out of the box has a better trigger. Kinda apples to apples. Get to a range and try them for yourself. One more thing to note, if you have a problem with the internal lock on either, the Smith has an advantage. The keyhole is located on the frame and is easily accessible. Ruger located theirs under the grip. Just for your consideration.

Not legal.

You are correct sir.

So I have been on a quest for a new EDC / defensive folder for quite a while now to replace one that was... less than ideal. As a long time Spyderco fan I spent quite a while looking through their knives. One thing I was looking for that they just didn't seem to offer however was some form of assisted opening. Finally, I found the perfect compromise, the Endura 4 Wave. The knife has a patented Emerson opener on the top of the blade, and when pulled from the pocket, the blade opens lightning fast (or with the use of the 'Spyderco hole'). So far, I have been unable to find a single thing I dislike about it. The knife is very lightweight (3.6oz) even with its skelotinized steel liners. Spyderco predrilled the handle on both ends and sides for the pocket clip which is nice in the event you dont want to use the Emerson opener for whatever reason. The FRN handle has a very aggressive bi-directional texture, combine that with jimping on the spine and blade, the knife has some serious grip. The flat saber-ground blade is made of very high quality VG-10 steel and comes razor shop from the factory. The lockup on the blade is very tight, I cannot detect any movement in it at all. Lastly, they included a David Boye dent in the lock-back. Overall this knife was designed from the ground up with one word in mind - utility. It has the perfect combination of usefulness, traction, speed, weight and quality to make it an excellent EDC for anyone in need of such a blade... and who isn't?! It's available on Amazon.com for around $70 right now.

We Catholics are normally considered pretty right wing, but honestly, this is thread is getting pretty funny. Gays are people. They have a minority sexual orientation. I really fail to see how this impacts military life. If people want to be bigots in order to maintain their own values, which are often misguided, that's fine. However, for the rest of us who prefer to see some progressiveness, please bugger off until you see the outcome of this - which I expect you never will (because it will be a non-issue). As for the gay soldiers themselves, I know quite a few who are tougher, smarter, more efficient, and better shots than their hetro counterparts, and they have the decorations to prove it. +1 for rationality. Edited to add: Anyone wanting a good read should check out this book. http://www.amazon.com/Gay-Warriors-Documentary-History-Ancient/dp/0814798861 While not really relevant to this topic - at all, it is a very well done and enlightening book.

Erik is quite right about Streamlight products being top quality. I have one and it is great if I need to light up a room in a jiff! On to the question of your gun. Many people will try to lure you into this debate of 9 vs. 40 for your first pistol. In terms of defensive loadings, 9mm has many terrefic offerings that are more than capeable of putting a bad guy down. The same holds true with .40. It's important to remember that the caliber you choose is completely pointless if you cannot achieve good shot placement. Given that, I would advise a 9mm. First, 9mm is cheaper to shoot, given that you will be able to practice a whole lot more. Second, 9mm is softer recoiling than .40, which will help you become a better shot through training. Third, 9mm is easy to find, after all, it is the NATO round. Fourth, 9mm is physically a bit smaller than .40, so that will afford you an extra round or two in your mag. HOWEVER, if you can afford to shoot .40, which hits just a bit harder, and will make just a bit bigger hole (not my much though depending on your loadings in 9mm), then I say go for it if that is what you want. Ultimately, get to a range and try them both for yourself. Many ranges will wave the rental fee if you buy one the same day. Just pay for your ammo. Lastly remember that either one is a very effective round, and in a Glock, you have an amazing and very reliable handgun. Myself, I have a Glock 17 and 26. The 26 I bought with factory night sights, which I like a whole lot. Consider if you get night sights that are not factory; the warranty, and how likely are they to get caught on your holster (which could damage them).

I have a Mossberg 500 Persuader, love it.

Military issue M9. May as well chuck the gun at the target.

Thanks for clearing that up for me Murgatroy.

"If this is your first ticket (traffic or otherwise), or if the last time you received a traffic ticket was over four years ago, you are a good candidate for diversion. That means that under normal circumstances, if you appear before the Judge in Court with a plea of Guilty or No Contest, there is a fair chance the Judge may offer you Judicial Diversion on one (1) violation with a ruling of "Dismissed upon payment of Costs"…" Link I dunno, just what the site says.

Askgeneral, what I meant is show up and enter a plea of no contest and see if it is possible to get the fine reduced / no points on my license via dismissal considering its my first offense.

Thanks fellas. I think I am just going to pay it outright. Murgatroy, you are absolutely right about that area being a revenue trap. Believe me, I have since adjusted my driving habits, and completely understand what you are saying about how hard it is to stay at 55 in that area... especially in a sports car. Confirm I am right guys, the fine on the city site for me is $107, that's all I pay right? I have always assumed court costs are included (or do I not have to pay them since I am not actually going to show up in court)?

Howdy all. So I am headed west on I-40 in Knoxville and am around the west hills exit when I see blue lights in my mirror. At the time I was following the flow of traffic in the middle lane while doing around 70 (posted speed is 55). The officer was very efficient and gave me no trouble. Now what I am wondering is should I pay the $107 dollars and change or go to court and fight it. It is my first offense of any kind, and I was wondering if any of you have any insight, especially into the knox city court system as to whether it is worth my time. By the way, I am correct in assuming court costs are included in my fine? If not... fml.

+1 on the Tri-Angle Sharpener, it is one of the best investments I have ever made.