Fallguy

...and just to back up what has been said. Here is TN AG Opinion 03-118 which says admission for "evaluation" does not a disqualify someone, only admission for treatment.

There is a picture of me in my profile....but here is another one. and.... My first getting out into the world after my divorce 8 years ago....lol The pic in the profile is more recent.

I think ZenDog "honestly" answered the question and pretty much hit the nail on the head.

I also noticed on the states TICS site that nearly 50% of gun purchases that were denied were appoved upon appeal. So the first answer isn't always the only answer. "IMO" it sounds more like a 72 hour evaluation instead of being commited, but I have been known to be wrong. I would read the question, and see if she "honestly" thinks whether or not she had mental disorder or was commited against her will.

I like the way you think!!

Yep...great place. Find myself on here all the time. I have a program that runs in the systems tray that checks my e-mail. When I get one from the forum it plays a .mp3 of an AK-47...I find myself running over to the computer ever time it fires.

Yep....that's about all the could do is tell you to leave.

Yes.. T.C.A. 39-17-1311((1)(G)(iv)

LOL...too funny Dixie....you make me smile

LOL

While I admit I wouldn't want to be the one to test it in court...I'm thinking if you just carry in the sanctuary and the school part you'd be ok. This is assuming the school is a completely separate building from the church.

Glad I'm not the only only one doing this. You and Mars are going to have to start answering post refering to the T.C.A. so I'm not doing it all the time...lol

To sum it up...mdmoseley is right except for canynracer's & bkelm18's notation. Plus I also agree with pws_smokeyjones

Sent e-mails to both.

Sounds good...look forward to the pics!

Besides places posted under 39-17-1359 there are only 4 statutorly off-limit places. A school or park, it is ok to have it in your vehicle. Places that serve alcohol for onsite consumption and rooms were judical proceedings are taken place by nature of the law only forbids carry inside the building or room. Now while I know some are going to disagree with me, techinaclly a property owner can forbid you from even having it in your car on their property if the post a proper sign according to T.C.A. 39-17-1359 at the entrance to the parking lot etc... But not sure how many are going to actually search your car?

I have to agree more with TN.Frank in that if you are in this land, you should be able to own and carry a firearm period. If all were armed the guys who wanted to bad would not last long with a bunch of good guys armed and able to put them in their place quick.

Nothing wrong with a "Wally World" type pack, that is the type I have used when using one. The only thing to remember is that some of the packs made for concealed carry will hold the weapon more secure and may have a quick access velcro compartment instead of having to unzip the compartment.

I think you are 100% right. I mean in no other place that it is legal to carry are they "required" to post a sign. I'm not sure if the committee it is in now can remove the amendement or not.

SUNTZU I think you are basically right. 39-16-601 has to do with recording a face to face conversation or a telephone conversation....and as you said as long as "you" consent it is fine. Also I think that you are right that 39-16-604 has to do with using a scanner to pick up those conversations.

Very true!!

DixieGirl....trying to stay as "family friendly" as I can....it's one other thing that you control that lets you control the other.... Let us know how the talk goes....and don't let him any of use violated the man code...lol

Where do I order one?!

Here it is T.C.A. 39-16-601Parts(a)(4) & (a)(5) (4) It is lawful under §§ 39-13-601 — 39-13-603 and title 40, chapter 6, part 3 for a person acting under the color of law to intercept a wire, oral or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception. (5) It is lawful under §§ 39-13-601 — 39-13-603 and title 40, chapter 6, part 3 for a person not acting under color of law to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication, where the person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to the interception, unless the communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the constitution or laws of the state of Tennessee. Here is the law about cell phones and cordless phones T.C.A. 39-13-604 Part((1) ( (1) A person commits an offense who, without the consent of at least one (1) party to a communication, intentionally records or disseminates a communication transmitted between two (2) cellular radio telephones, a cellular radio telephone and a landline telephone, or a cordless telephone and a cellular radio telephone. It looks like according to Part ((2) it looks like it would be illegal to disseminate the recording between two cordless phones or a cordless phone and a land line phone. (2) A person commits an offense who intentionally disseminates a communication transmitted between two (2) cordless telephones or a cordless telephone and a landline telephone, if such dissemination is not authorized by a court order.