sigmtnman

Would there be concern for dragging around a loaded weapon if it fell out while riding?

F*** him. We have the right to try people in the Court of Public Opinion. What's with all these folks who want to try him based on evidence. We needed to get him just like we got Iraq for attacking NY and DC on 9/11. Ya bunch of white middle aged, gun owning, terrorist sympathizers. Nappyheaditano has a million eyes on you. Same folks will probably decry our governments support of the UN small arms treaty too.

It doesn't really matter. The wheels are in motion and will they will not stop. Wonder when they will go after all the terrorist gun owners? Remember, if you see something, say something. The boogyman is after us and wont rest until the last shred of semblance of our once great nation is gone.

I remember when everything in walmart was "Made in the USA". When Sam died and his greedy kids took over, they became MaoMart. That would be the line of demarcation for me. So, in effect Walmart not only undermined the local mom and pops after Sam died, but they also drove manufacturers overseas to meet the target prices and undercut American manufacturers. If the "civil war" (bs) was fought to free the slaves, why do we continue to push our manufacturing to countries that use slave labor?

Tampons To Your Door - Deliver My Tampons

You couldn't get me into a Walmart if they were giving the whole ammo counter away for free.

-General Pat Cleburne, CSA

What about saw based tags?

Not if the cost was not driven down enough yet, or if the tech was classified/restricted use. Don't think beaming so much as remote sensing.

Quick google search says they can, though I did not research further to verify: RFID Journal - RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) Technology News & Features Note that the post in question was from 2005.

Not saying they are the same. Was merely stating that we generally don't find out about such technology until many years after they are in use. To say there is no current capability with 100% certainty would be an assumption. I would be willing to bet, if the capability is not already available, someone somewhere is working towards it.

Fellow I used to work with did some cartography from sat images back in the sixties. He said they had pictures of the faces of wrist watches. I would be surprised if the capability to read RFID from a great distance did not exist.

Not sure why the link is not working for you. It does for me for some reason though it only takes you to the main page, then you have to enter page # 14 into the page selector at the top.

Good, bad or otherwise; I didn't see where this has been posted and didn't want to post it specifically to long or short guns. The Sept issue of Gun Trade Wold has an article on page 14 which you can read at: Gun Trade World - September 2011

Truth.

Incessant lying is one of the our countries biggest issues. Radical truth is what we need.

SCL Defence - Infrastructure - SCL Defence

They are not talking about simple marketing. Did you watch the video by chance?

This will be written off by many, but if it will wake up just one person, then it is worth it. Home - SCL Election How manipulated are we and how do they do it? They will tell you in a nice flash video at: - SCL Hub http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AB28IJbvbe0 SCL Home - SCL Hub The four images at that page are a bit spooky. How many decisions are truely your own?

Are we still shooting these 3 girls?

Well, one thing is for sure. If we don't get Paul, it will be 4 more years of the same.

You are correct, no president will fix the problem alone and Ron Paul is absolutely not the messiah. He is the only honest Republican running though. There is no hidden "conspiracy" in the media. Big media is controlled by an incestuous board of director representing the largest corporations in the world. Those corporations do not want to lose government funding, so they would never allow anyone who is for a smaller government to get honest/equal time. The message you receive is through their filter. It is, what it is. BTW, been married for 15 years, so I understand compromise. It's ok when it is for the good and just reasons, but compromise for the sake of compromise is evil and wrong.

Great minds think alike and lazy minds rely on others. In post #107, you want to know who supports him. That is not a discussion about policy, but a meta discussion about third parties opinions. Post #114 is a meta discussion as well. It appears as though your entire picture of Dr. Paul is based on what the media has fed you. Surely you have some genuine thoughts on policy?

Do you really want to have a discussion? It seems like you don't since you only refer to other folks opinions. What is your personal bent against Dr. Paul?

The trend I see... Folks vote based on who they think will get elected, not who they think would be the best choice for them. Don't hear too many people say they would not vote for him based on policy but instead, they just claim that he can't be elected so they are not voting for him. The exception would be those folks who think the USA should be the world's police at the expense of our tax payers.