sigmtnman

The government. The Constitution works much like a trust.

The Constitution defines and restricts the government. So, no, it does not apply to citizens.

Why would anyone put a laser on an ak?

We can't have our cake and eat it too. There is nothing forcing anyone to go onto someone else's property. The Constitution says the .gov can not subvert your God given rights, it does not apply to individuals.

Well, my x-ray machine of course. TSA has one, why not me?

If you invited a guest to your house, would you ask them to leave if they had something objectionable to you? Using the trunk argument, how is your clothing any different? You own your clothes.

It would seem that bringing your property within the confines of another persons property makes you a guest. By bringing anything undesirable to the property owner, who's property you have encroached upon, you are subject to being removed via trespassing no? My pants are my property, so should I be allowed to carry a gun in my pocket into said workplace? If the rules of the other parties private property are disagreeable to you, then go elsewhere for employment, services, housing, etc. on a side note: The county owns your land. Try not paying property taxes and see what happens.

I didn't read that they were shooting on a half acre, but rather that the properties were separated by a half acre lot. Though I may be misinterpreting it...

But... It's for the children.

This is what I was thinking. With inflation running as high as it is this is a blessing for the company to be able to blame the .gov for what it wanted to do anyway. Anyone notice the new 12.5 oz cokes being pushed?

How about some pics to better explain the issue? Is it duty treated or just stainless?

"It's Free Swipe Yo EBT"

Thank you. The holster is tuckable, BTW.

I carry a full size in a dm bullard IWB holster at 4:00.

Congress is al quada

why can't it? A marriage license is just a tax. Are we so defeated as a population that we are unable to imagine exxersising our God given rights without .gov involvement?

Marriage is defined by the church not the state. The .gov has no business being involved in it.

No, you don't appear to know about RP because you continue to distort his views.

Dr. Paul's support of DOMA was because he believes the Fed has no place telling the States what to do. He feels marriage is basically a contract between 2 people the .gov has no place in it.

Thanks for Explaining Robert. This clip from the Judge explains how plenty of Republicans feel regarding the direction of the party and why the third party is an option.

I'm curious why you feel he runs to boost his ego? Is that a blanket statement based on how politicians are or has he done something to make you feel he is egotistic? Earlier you state: Perhaps he is doing what you suggest? Have you seriously listened to him talk for an extended period of time? He doesn't do soundbites, he understands what he talks about and always comes across as very cordial and thoughtful.

I did the leg work for you. Here is a duty treated vbob for $1599 http://www.covecreekoutfitters.com/gun-room/dan-wesson-v-bob-45acp-01983-black-polycoat

...