sigmtnman

  This was enough to know where you stand and where you are from...

The title of the thread is not "I don't have enough ugly ass guns so tell me I need a glock"  :rofl:   My 1911s poop glocks.

I'd take a malfunctioning S&W 1911 come lately over a ugly ass POS glock. :ugh: 

  Interesting.

Also.... My understanding is that the manufacturers must submit three samples of the same gun for initial testing and approval to be added to the roster.  Once on the roster, the manufacturer must pay a yearly fee to keep the guns on the roster.  If they don't pay, then the gun is de-certified.

"Godzirra!"

      Extortion, tax, tomato, potato, tomato.

Oh, I thought the OP was referencing the blending of the mainspring housing.  Bad comprehension on my part...  After re-reading, I see you are talking about the grip safety itself.  It does look like it was replaced as does the checkered mainspring housing.   That is one ugly gun though with all the rollmarks and snake skin cocking serrations.

  http://corvettemuseum.org/enews/backups/media/sinkhole.htm

FWIW, I've had a few bobtails and while none were S&W they all had slight variations in the rounding/bump.

America the Beautiful reads like a prayer to God.  I have no problem with Coke getting as many folks as possible "behind" it.

Whoever approved the no knock raid and also the warrant should be held accountable.

  We have been talking about drones hovering around the roof lines of houses.  You really are being obtuse about it huh.

Sorry.   That thing is hideous.

  Can a low flying cessna hover outside a window?    Besides, pert sure, they would end up in trouble...

  No match for my vorpal sword.

      :poop:

  Missed it by a mile.

    Then accept my apologies for thinking you were trying to scare people into not acting and waiting for the responding officer to decide and thanks for pointing out your thoughts about the law...

  Why would I care if the investigating Officer could tell the difference?  You are not getting it.

  For not living in fear, you sure try to scare everyone into licking the boot.  It's a recurring theme in your posts.  Pert sure I'm not the only one who has noticed.   If there  is a law that would put a person in jail for taking out a device that is invading that persons privacy then it is unjust.  Regardless  of original "intent".

  It is also a decent excuse for "accidentally" filming inside of houses.

DaveTN,   Not everyone lives in fear of "the boot".  Unjust laws must be broken now and again regardless of possible consequences from responding LEOs, DAs and other folks who have lost common sense.

The commercial sucks.    Swill or not, I like NC.  It tastes sorta like cream soda with a kick.