sigmtnman

  Boudreaux and Thibodeaux approve of this message. 

We gun owners must stand with Connecticut gun owners.  If things do not go the right way we must pour into the state and protest this.  We lost California and New York.  If we loose more states the momentum will pick up.   If we wait for it to come to our state, it will be too late.

Go Cato!  Libertarians FTW!

I'd rather have a fellow argue caliber than argue gun control.

  Not sure if he is a fool or not.  Sounds like he is trying to get the legislatures to reconsider their position while giving them an out.  Read his release that Chuck posted:  http://ctcarry.com/News/Releases

Going broke fighting in Afghanistan was a big factor in the collapse of the soviet government.

Incontheivable!

If we can't get the commies out of our country, what makes anyone think we can remove them from where they have thrived for hundreds of years.   We should be vigilant and poised to defend ourselves, but a land war in Asia the soviet block  is suicide.

The article in the Examiner yesterday confirmed it had been mailed.  You may want to read it.   http://www.examiner.com/article/crisis-connecticut-confrontation-looming

I guess you do! Nice collection!

  Would the selective enforcement give us some sort of option to pursue?  Is there any precedence for that sort of thing?

I had a buddy mail me a check for a mountain bike I sold him.  After a couple of weeks, with no check he sent another one.  About a year later the original showed up with "found in equipment" written on the envelope.

  Nah, but I've heard "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."

So, medical marijuana laws faced the same argument.  How have those states been successful in evading the feds?  Soon after those laws were passed the citizens of those states said F you to the .gov.   I'm surprised that we don't have as big of balls in the firearm community.   Although, I reckon most of those supporters were probably breaking the law before and really didn't care?

More recent article on the letter available here:   http://www.examiner.com/article/crisis-connecticut-confrontation-looming

Here is a recent article from the Examiner regarding the letter in the other thread.   http://www.examiner.com/article/crisis-connecticut-confrontation-looming

  ah, no.  :D

  It helps on cross country trips to know just how far you can push it.  That said, an UC is no RG.  :P

  Ethanol gets about as much less percent mileage as the the percent of ethanol added to the gas.  I never ran it in my bike though unless i had no other options and * had* to get it.  That stuff is horrible.

  I regularly achieved 45 or more on my 96" road glide at 80.

  wall of text.  :D   ETA.  although wide open throttle could apply as well!

W.O.T!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Call me when they come in 3x3 with a lift.

The pic in the comments over there is funny.

Touche, but he is is no Ivan, Boris or Vlad. The guys in the other pics look the part.