c.a.willard

I wouldn't say a dealer wont have any part of it.   The reason i will be a life long customer of G&L is from something similar.   Bought my wife a Walther P-22, had tons of issues with it.  We took it in one day to shoot and were talking about it in front of the clerk.  He asked if he could let the the smith look at it real quick, they found some form of factory defect.  Told me it would need to go back to the factory.  Then he asked me where i got it, when i told him i got it at G&L he said they would take care of sending it back.  Went in to the back talked to someone for a minute came back out and gave me a replacement on the spot.  Had to pay another 10 for the TICS but it was worth it.   Some shops truly know the definition of customer service and will help you even when it is something completely out of their control.   No problems out of the replacement gun BTW, great little pistol.

Winchesters parts website recommends this guy for parts for that particular rifle.   Jack First, Inc. 1201 Turbin Drive Rapid City SD, 57701 Phone: 605-343-8481   I checked their website and they do not have a parts catalog online so i would suggest giving them a call and seeing what they can do.

Already another thread started on the topic   http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/70020-zimmerman-in-trouble-again/   Also what up with the link to the black bear harvest data

Weren't there some reports of the slide breaking in half.  I would wager that may have something to do with the recall.

Not to put words in TMF's mouth but i think the point he is trying to make is that when an officer does something like this and another one helps cover for them it impugns the integrity of the entire department.  Bad officers exist and they must be held accountable for their actions.  When a department fails to hold that officer accountable for his actions they assume that accountability themselves.  That is what leadership is all about. 

Syria is key to Russian naval presence in the Med.   Russia is highly unlikely to back down from protecting that key piece of real estate .  

First and middle initials and my last name.    I'm a keep it simple kind of guy

[URL=http://s987.photobucket.com/user/cwillard1983/media/paigebeard_zps95ade200.png.html][/URL] My Daughter

Montgomery County Shooting Complex

For Clarksville specifically, this has been an ongoing problem for may years.  Although crime here is raising i feel there is a lot of political pressure to undercharge and plea everything in order to falsely lower the crime data. 

Good idea or bad, i know i am likely to give verbal commands to any intruder.  To many years training to give commands before use of force.

nah, if I wanted to drive a bunch of muscle cars, steal money, shoot cops, and beat up hookers I'd just move to Detroit. 

If your wife doesn't have a medical condition, then racking the slide is only a matter of training.

they can call it whatever they want, but in my mind when the bevel the pad to act as a cheek rest it became apparent that it is designed to be usable as a stock.    On the other hand SBR laws are stupid anyways so good on them for playing the same game the ATF plays all the time and apparently winning for now

I think he was more talking about mobility killing the vehicle.  The engine block area on the caymen isnt armored so a wlll placed shot should damage the engine block and mobility kill the vehicle.

Plenty of weaknesses in the vehicle to exploit without the need to try to penetrate the armor.  As TMF mentioned earlier fire is the most cost effective means.  Tons of ways to mobility kill this vehicle.    The city covering the maintenance is still probably cheaper than buying even the lowest cost armored vehicle new.  I dont understand peoples major issue with this.  The truck offers some good capabilities, misuse may be a possibility but not a likely one.  I would much rather see the vehicle go to a local LE agency than be scrapped or pay to ship it off shore to some random country that well probably end up fighting later. 

How is not remotely true i said they would have to cover the maintenance.  Fuel is part of maintaining the thing.  I never once said that there was no cost whatsoever.   Just that they aquired it without having to pay the cost of the vehicle itself.  They are only responsible for maintenance.

Just as important to note is this vehicle was aquired at no cost to the city other than they are now responsible for maintenance.    If your worried about them from a SHTF point i can teach you how to destroy one with a couple dollars worth of stuff in just a few minutes

Double post

Had my daughter's pediatrician ask me and the wife. At the same time she asked about other risk factors as well, like pools, cabinets etc. So the gun part didn't bother me. My wife stopped her when she started talking about safety stuff and basically told her I was a safety fanatic. We then had a good conversation where I educated the doctor on several quality safety programs out there for kids and parents. Now instead of trying to talk something she doesn't know well, if you say yes she offers you a sheet with some safety resources and leaves it at that.

If you go through the class you shouldn't have to go to the court date. Just trying to save you some money. Im assuming your a younger person and those insurance increases can really hurt.

No a speeding ticket if payed will not hurt you when buying a firearm. Since this is your first you may want to look in to the defensive driving course. Frequently this option can satisfy the citation and avoid points on your license

I hope lenny doesn't f it up for everyone .  If you read the defenses to what he is charged with  TCA  39-17-1302     39-17-1302   B) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that the person’s conduct: (7) Involved acquisition or possession of a sawed-off shotgun, sawed-off rifle, machine gun or firearm silencer which is validly registered to the person under federal law in the National Firearms Registration and Transfer Records. A person who acquires or possesses a firearm registered as required by this subdivision shall retain proof of registration.     Thanks to lenny we may very well see case law that invalidates trusts in Tennessee.   If its registered to his FFL maybe everyone gets lucky.

  IIRC his suppressor is a personal one registered to a trust not to him as an individual or one owned by his FFL because the chief LEO struck language through his original paperwork. It was one of his many frivolous lawsuits. So the tax stamp itself does not prove that its legal for him to possess, just that its registered to a trust.  he also has to prove that he is a trustee on that trust.  They couldn't even see the tax stamp until after the warrant to open up the case which was several hours after Lenny was arrested.     Edited to add:  Hopefully Lenny consulted an attorney and his trust is set up properly, but from his displays of thinking he understands the law better than attorneys that specialize in it i think its likely that he did one of the many DIY NFA trusts out there.   Edited to add more:  He may have bit himself in the rear when in court he said he owned the suppressor.  If it is in a trust then he is not the "registered owner" the trust is, and he is just a trustee that can possess the property.

You know what would have prevented this, if he was in prison for the felony he plead guilty to in march of this year.  He was arrested for terroristic threats in march of this year, negotiated a plea and sentence to 3 years probation.