monkeylizard

27/30

  Just one question......do you eat at Joey's or at Nick's?  :D

Joey's opens at 11:00. The line starts forming around 10:45.

If by that you mean you'd eat it if you were starving in a North Korean labor camp, then we're on the same page.     Life's too short for bad food.

For those of you on the south side, Nick's Italian Deli in Franklin (close to the Target on Columbia Ave, behind the Burger King and Advance Auto Parts) is very similar to Joey's House of Pizza. It used to be in Cool Springs, but he moved a year or so ago. Nick and Joey are (IIRC) brothers-in-law. Nick's was first, then Joey left there to start his own place. I get the feeling that they don't like each other very much. :)

Joey's is very good but I say Pizza Perfect has the better pizza. Joey's has awesome main dishes. Their Chicken Parm and Lasagna are both incredible. Plus they have the Gladiator and that's hard to beat.   For selection, I give Joey's the edge, but Pizza Perfect is, well, perfect. Plus they're open for more than just M-F lunch.

  That has to be the saddest thing I'll read all day.

The part he left off is that he came back and slashed her tires and keyed her door.  :D

Pizza Perfect. There's one in Bellevue and one on 21st behind Vandy.       <<drops the mic>>       This thread is closed.

That's the only place I see it. The /nosleep subreddit is for horror fiction. Anything else that references staircases cites the /nosleep subreddit as a source, if it cites anything at all.

Actually, JMB developed the .50 BMG round for anti-aircraft purposes after WWI. Fixed-wing, not helis. It was of course used in the M2, which was vehicle mounted for AA purposes and aircraft mounted for, well, I guess you'd call that AA too. :) Our smart GIs figured out that the M2 worked pretty darn well against ground targets too, but it was first intended for AA use.   I don't really know what Barrett had in mind when he developed the M82, whether it was meant as anti-personnel or anti-light vehicle. It's of course used for both.

Sorry about your Chihuahua. When I hit the fire water, I get crazy.

They're saying that El Chapo's intention in having the rifle was to take down helicopters, not that taking down helis was the intention of the existence of the rifle.  

  It's hard to take that one seriously.

It's about a mountain clan in modern-day Kentucky living up on their mountain. Only problem is that "their" mountain is apparently owned by someone else. That someone else is a timber company who wants them off the mountain so logging can begin. The local Sheriff doesn't want any part of evicting them, but he has a job to do. Hilarity Pandemonium follows.   It's going to be a bit of an anti-corporate thing with the timber guys saying stuff like "Sheriff, get them off that mountain so we can make our money." and the mountain people saying "they're not kicking us off our  mountain!". But it doesn't seem to gloss over the fact that the mountain people are kind of hypocritical assholes. They don't want the outside world's way of living imposed on them, but feel perfectly fine riding their muddy ATVs through the town store and causing mayhem in the lives of people who choose to live differently than them.

Yeah, that's Voldemort, King of Douches, Grand Emperor of Jackholes everywhere.

I didn't read his post as supporting 1359, but rather pointing out the difference in how a 1359 v. trespassing would be prosecuted.   Both are misdemeanors which means it has to be a citizens arrest or a police officer has to witness it for themselves. Barring "No Trespassing" signs, there's no way for an officer to witness trespassing (because they don't know a particular person is on premises w/o permission) without the property owner/manager openly saying to a police officer "monkeylizard is trespassing. I asked him to leave and he didn't. Arrest him. I'm pressing charges." That's alos only going to work if he asks me to leave and I don't. If he never asked me to leave, just called the cops, I haven't trespassed. He can ask me to leave in the presence of the officer, or ask the officer to ask me to leave. If I don't, then I'm trespassing.That owner/manager then has to appear in court to accuse me of trespassing.That translates to a whole lot more hassle for the owner operator than a -1359 violation which the officer can witness for himself. He can then accuse me of it in open court and the owner/manager never has to get involved beyond a simple phone call about a MWAG.   Did I get that right?

You don't think that's intentional, do you?

  So, they're like the Muslim version of Baptists?  :D   :hiding:

Kinda surprised those hippies don't already have that law on the books.

Yep. Let's not add another goofy law to try to correct a goofy law. Let's just get rid of the first one. But then legislators and their attorney buddies would have nothing to do if they made the laws simple.

Outsiders premieres next Tuesday night (Jan 26th) on WGN. Anyone else planning to watch?   http://wgnamerica.com/series/outsiders

But you do discard it if you're a lawyer going to use it in court to support a law that's being challenged, when the courts have shown that argument to be less than sound in the past.

  Except that same argument was used to support Jim Crow laws and we see how that worked out.

  Doh! yes, I meant 1359. Post corrected. Thanks!