monkeylizard

TBH = To Be Honest

AK pistols work too. The mini Draco is roughly 5"-6" shorter over all than a 10.5" barreled AR (YMMV based on buffer tube and muzzle device selection).   Dolomite did a cool build of a mini Draco that he shared on this thread: http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/82736-my-edc-mini-draco-final-version/   ISTM that either could be chosen for carrying, but the goofy holsters are just silly. Keep it in a backpack or murse.

It's a pistol. You can carry one open or concealed. You should carry it like this just to be extra awesome. :)

Be sure to see if the seller inlcludes the shipping or not. That could be hefty.

The Q&A and the reviews on the Amazon banana slicer are pretty good too. http://www.amazon.com/Hutzler-571-Banana-Slicer/dp/B0047E0EII/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top?ie=UTF8

No worries. You recently joined so you haven't yet seen how quickly anyone who mentions a "CCP" gets corrected about how much awesomer we are with our HCP. :D

  I know. It was a joke. 

+1 to the Stars & Bars < > the flag on top of the Duke's General Lee. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flags_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America

The Q&A is great too.   Q: Is it kosher? A: No. It is used for porking

Here in Tennessee, it's an HCP. You can carry open or concealed.                   :devil:    :hiding:   Seriously though, good find. I have a P-22 and have liked the ergonomics of most Walther handguns. That one looks to be no different.

  Get the kind with a combination lock. I have the key one and it's a PITA.

Don't feel bad. None of that's in the article linked in the OP.

  This x 1,000. 39-17-1359 being repealed would be awesome. I'm not holding my breath with the Harwell-Ramsey-Haslam machine in place, but I thought the same thing about the parks bill and it passed. I'm not saying that a private business can't prohibit firearms, just that their private prohibition shouldn't carry the force of law with it. It should be no different than banning shirtless/shoeless people. It becomes trespassing if asked to leave and you don't, but no actual legal offense for being shirtless/shoeless/armed in the first place.

  FIFY!

  I don't think you understand how FIFY works on forums.

  FIFY :up:

^^^^^^ Truth!

  Not according to the law, they can't. The drinking has to have been done while in possession of the firearm and it must have been done "within the confines of an establishment open to the public where liquor, wine or other alcoholic beverages, as defined in § 57-3-101(a)(1)(A), or beer, as defined in § 57-6-102, are served for consumption on the premises" in order to have the HCP revoked. In other words, you can get drunk as a skunk at a bar without your handgun, then arm yourself. Or you can get drunk at home while armed. You'll be in violation of 39-17-1321 (a ), but that doesn't come with the revocation of an HCP attached as a penalty. You have to have been doing the drinking in an establishment as described above while armed to qualify for the HCP revocation prescribed in 39-17-21(c ).   Notice that "handgun" is used in part (a ). You could get as drunk as you want anywhere you want (unarmed), then arm up with a long gun and not be in violation of 39-17-1321. You may or may not be violating other laws about carrying a long gun, but it wouldn't be a violation of -1321.   Am I missing something?

Why don't you come over here and say that to my face!!!!! :rant: <knock> <knock> :bat: <<<That's Grand Torino :eek: :hiding:

You are correct, but the signs don't have to come down. They're just incorrect. They will be removed as maintenance requires it.

Yep. http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/topic/80000-cmmgwhy-oh-why-did-i-listen-to-outpost-armory/?p=1167307

  Were you in the left lane?

  I heard he got hit by a car and died.                             He was playin on the road again.

Me too. Still thinking about it....strongly.

  But the article said that even if the police could prove who fired the shots, the magistrate won't hand down a warrant. That means it's effectively not a criminal act regardless of what the municpal code says. That makes it sort of like the old ordinances in some TN towns that say a man has to walk in front of an automobile waving 2 red or orange flags if a woman is driving, to warn pedestrians and other drivers. It's still on the books in some places, but not enforced so it may as well not be there.