Dolomite_supafly

What about taking some 1" PVC and glue some thinner, then thinned PVC inside. And maybe add a piece of 3/8" steel rod inside to give it some strength and weight. I know a 1" PVC with a thinner PVC inside makes a very effective bow.

What about something other than wood? What about fiberglass or maybe aluminum.   http://www.katom.com/028-362005800.html   http://www.grainger.com/product/TOUGH-GUY-Fiberglass-Broom-Handle-WP168775/_/N-m66?s_pp=false&picUrl=//static.grainger.com/rp/s/is/image/Grainger/1VAC6_AS01?$smthumb$   http://www.grainger.com/product/TOUGH-GUY-Fiberglass-Threaded-Handle-WP168780/_/N-m66?s_pp=false&picUrl=//static.grainger.com/rp/s/is/image/Grainger/1NFF5_AS01?$smthumb$

Anyone dead set on coming to my house unannounced better be better armed than me. The first reported case in Tennessee means anyone who comes a knocking is infected in my mind. Not going to take a chance on getting sick just to be nice. No one will be coming in my house. And trust me when I say I would prefer not to litter my lawn with contaminated blood either.

You can also put the image code before and after the image. [ I m g ]this is where you post the image URL [ / I m g ] When doing it this way omit all the spaces between the brackets and letters.

Apparently there are some more potential cases in Oklahoma and Georgia. How fast it is moving is surprising and scaring a lot of people including me. My choice not to move to town is starting to look like a good one.

If all you have is one trust it isn't that bad but for those that have more than one it can be a pain. I am removing my son from the trust for the moment. He is in the military and getting his Provost Marshal to sign off might be a bit problematic considering they cannot even have privately owned weapons on base.   The incentives to have a trust are about to go down the drain. After this no more 20 day approvals, no more anonymous users.   I have a couple more I have to submit before December. I am hoping to get at least four more items submitted before years end. I am so torn, I want to buy a lot more ammo and survival crap to get ready for what is probably about to kick off.

Still getting a blank page after that when going to www.walmart.com

  That IP worked.   Funny thing is I have gotten a few other IPs for Walmart.com while tracing and pinging.

Trying to get to the website using IP results in the same thing as if I use walmart.com.   The IP I am getting when I ping walmart.com is http://158.85.130.12/

I have tried clinking on a link as well as typing the address it.   It goes to Walmart.com but nothing is displayed, not even error messages. It is like Walmart.com is a blank page.

Everything was deleted, twice now, as well as defaults restored.   In private browning did not work either.   As I said I believe it is a PC issue and not a browser issue because FireFox will not go to Walmart either.

I consider myself somewhat computer savvy but this has me stumped. I cannot go to Walmart.com. I can go to any other website but not Walmart's website. Funny thing is on my wife's computer we can surf Walmart so it is not a router, or beyond, issue.   I believe it is a computer setting issue, and not an IE issue, because I cannot go to Walmart.com using Firefox either.   I can ping it and trace route it through the command window and all looks fine.   I have: restored IE to default settings restored to a previous restore point when I KNOW I could go to Walmart.com installed all the Windows updates manually added Walmart.com to the trusted sites list in IE.   I have tried http://www.walmart.com/ https://www.walmart.com/   Anyone have any idea what else to try?    

Even if you do not donate spread the word to any other forums or social media you belong to.

Not a problem on the Tennessee side.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_Virginia     § 15.2-915.2 § 18.2-287.4 § 18.2-282.  

And imagine the innovation that will come when anyone can experiment with silencer designs. We are using technology that hasn't changed in over 100 years.

Because right now we have an "IN". They did approve some newly manufactured machine guns then revoked the approval. The lawyer in the OP is the one that is representing all those who have applied and been denied.   Right now the law states it is illegal for a PERSON to manufacture, or buy, a newly registered machine gun but the ATF has rules that entities, such as trusts and corporations, are NOT persons.

Plenty of others out there that do the same but not as cheap. I talked to my wife about another run and we have decided it is not worth it right now.

+1   Also, there are a lot of people who make a lot of money buying, selling, trading NFA items and if this gets overturned they will loose a lot of money. Those same people would fight tooth and nail to keep it from being overturned even though their livelihood is made buying and selling those same items they would want to keep banned from manufacture.

He is a good guy. I have talked to him in the past and he has always been honest with me.   He was the one who is suing on behalf of those who were approved to make a MG but later had the permission retracted.   Personally ownership of inanimate objects should not be regulated at all. What should be regulated is the person owning the item. That is if I can legally own a single shot 22 I should be able to legally own a 50 BMG machine gun in the same manner. If I want to own a tank, hand grenades or a fighter jet I should be able to if I can own a 22 and if I can afford it.

  Not any more unless you are local.

  Yep, 20 years ago a country acre was expensive if it was $1,000. Now that same acre is $10,000, or more, because people from up north realized what a deal the land is down here compared to where they live now. And when you get a bunch of people, who make 5x or more what we do, competing for property it cuts us right out of it because we cannot afford to spend 5x what we were barely able to afford before. Once a few locals see their neighbors property selling for 5x what it was worth a couple of years earlier they raise their prices.      The vast majority of people who are coming here to retire bring NOTHING to Tennessee yet cost everyone involved like the locals, their local government as well as the state. More than one I have talked to have said they are going to sue their local government to try to change things to make it more like the state they left. It sickens me because those lawsuits cost the taxpayers and then our taxes go up.

  What scares me more than anything else is people from the liberal states moving here.   I have met a couple of people from "up north" and they were both talking about how they wanted to change things here to be more like the liberal state they left. They like the cheap cost of living here but hated leaving their liberal, utopian paradise.   Why can't people leave well enough alone.

That is correct but I have several trustees listed, some not even in this state, who will have to fill out and submit this paperwork if I ever add another item to the trust after this goes into effect.

http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?158359-ATF-Form-23-CLEO-for-Trusts-and-Corps   They would not be producing these forms if it is not going to be going into effect. Now is the time to put things into a trust because as soon as this becomes a requirement the trust will take over a year as opposed to the 20 days it is taking now.   So anytime you submit you will have to get new fingerprint cards, new photographs and everything else like filing as an individual even if you are already on the trust and previously approved. Also it must be done for each trustee for each new item. That would be insane to buy a single suppressor then have to submit 10 sets for forms for your 10 trustees. Talk about extending the time it will take to get approved. Doing a background on a person takes over a year now, imagine the time it will take if you have 5 trustees.

At the time we had one of those small compressors so it ran constantly between shots and stayed connected.