Loving that arguement, however I wish this case weren't being tried. The fact that he was illegally in posession of machine guns, and is trying to use the heller case to get a pass isn't the best idea. An a negative ruling here would possibly hinder machine gun ownership, and possibly even lead to "paramilitary" (assault) weapon bans. On the other hand, if the argument that the 2nd ammendment upholds machine guns this could be VERY GOOD. I would love a chance (was too young in the 80s) to buy a machine gun at retail, not over inflated market price due to them being banned. Believe me if that chance comes about I will go broke stockpiling Anyway anyone else wanna chime in. I think the decision is the big deal. Glad someone has the balls, just wish someone with a good arguement was pressing the issue.