tnhawk

The jury decision will have nothing to do with the riot that follows it.

I've always thought ordering Krystals was probable cause - drunk or high?

My concern is I don't want an officer's emotions to thump me over my rights. Being respectful of an officer usually results in their respecting my rights.

If politics were not involved, there would be no trial.

I got the same message.

I look forward to attending, as I'll be in Knoxville from 7/14-19. AK4SZ

TM did finally learn that actions have consequences

Just a normal day. There were only two shooting incidents reported during the fireworks in downtown memphis.

The problem is they can't find any evidence in the locker.

I had Hospital insurance from the NRA Endorced Insurance Program several years ago. After an accident, they decided a broken hip and two broken arms didn't require a hospital stay and refused to pay for the time I was confined in a hospital. I've since dropped all insurance policies I had thru the NRA, as they are worthless when needed.

That might get you shoot and robbed in Memphis.

Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. There's a way to accomplish a goal - this isn't it.

I fail to see any good reason to carry without a permit, under the current laws. The risk of fines and jail/prison time outweigh the expense and time necessary to obtain and legallay carry. In the event I find it necessary to defend myself with a weapon, I'd prefer to stand before the judge and jury as a law abiding citizen instead of as one who ignores the laws.

[quote name="ab28" post="991861" timestamp="137270068....For the guns in parking lots thing, you shouldn't be able to get fired for it, period. The employers not wanting guns around them is based on lies and misconceptions, which invalidates that rule. If an employer is giving me rules that aren't based in logic and reasoning, I have no obligation to follow them. Rules for employees should be based on actual circumstances, not just a business owner's whims.   Knowing the reason for a rule defines whether you need to follow it or not. If a box says "no knives to open", I take it to mean use a knife, but be careful not to cut the contents. The reason for the rule is people go hog wild and stick a blade 3 inches past the packing tape and destroy everything. The same applies to the carry on company property rule. The rule has no basis other than an owner's wishes. I still risk becoming unemployed if I violate an employer's rules.

If you're going to use a 3" compact 1911, don't bother taking a class with Tom Givens. Otherwise I've heard he's a good instructor.

From first-hand experience - if you're questioned by an officer, while carrying without a permit, it won't go well. You will be arrested and charged for the violation.

I've owned XD and glock, both are dependable and shoot well. I prefer the XD.

If I could afford the legal expenses of being a test case, I wouldn't need employment.

I've had my EMP40 for almost 2years. It's been accurate and dependable.

I'm sure those in power are busy finding or creating facts against him as fast as possible.

When is a politician not fibbing?

The only way to get a Congressman's attention is to send him home after his replacement takes office.

I can risk loss of employment (bad option) or leave weapon at home while I travel, leaving me unarmed most of the time (bad option). The option I've been using, has been to store my weapon in a hotel safe, while visiting a work site. 

The agents were probably searching for the Constitution and Ammendments which have been stolen by our current government.

With the use of random searches and dogs trained to detect firearms, out of sight and silence are not enough.