mikegideon

I'm already a criminal for some of the stuff I've done with women. :) Might as well carry on.

You beat me to it

I saw it, and thought it was genuine too. With that said, now he's off to apply the wrong solutions, and a lot of them. My deep dislike for the guy lies in his incompetence.

What Mas said...   http://backwoodshome.com/blogs/MassadAyoob/2012/12/15/against-monsters/

You're pretty smart for a meat eater :). We can blame the gun, morals, lack of accessible mental health care, etc. Fact is, if somebody would have capped his ass, the killing would have stopped immediately. We need to protect our kids like we protect our money. It's a nasty world.

Pretty simple, ain't it? :)

Maybe I wasn't clear. If you want to stop an attack, you put up armed resistance. I don't think removing privacy policy will survive a court challenge. Libtard disease won't let EITHER happen, so they would prefer to eliminate guns. Drag everybody down to the lowest common denominator.

How can you be so sure? His goal appeared to be the killing of a large number of folks. If he had showed up at my house, he wouldn't have been able to kill anybody.

How do you prevent someone from attacking people. This is REAL simple. We just have a large quantity of idiots in charge. Can that same shooter come into your house and kill everybody?

Unfortunately, the libtards began screaming confiscation before the blood was dry. I can only take so much of that before I fire back.

+2

Big congrats on the job. The hair will come back (if you don't shave it). :)

HEY! I'm not a retard... I'm special :)

Their budgets are real limited. I don't know anything about the frequencies in this discussion. Obviously, the guy in the OP got their attention.

I'm with this guy :up:

Unfortunatly, it will be politicized before the bodies are cold.

Good to see you posting a little more frequently. You running out out Taliban or somethin'? :)

Not for me. Those little suckers can be hard to see and easy to miss. I've killed most of my tree rats with a shotgun.

Maybe. Fact is, this happened in a state with stout gun control. One could argue that it ain't real effective when it comes down to it. Happened in a gun free zone to boot.

Couldn't have said it better myself. BTW... the email isn't filtered like the post.

Like I said, nothing really wrong with tipoff. Me... I would wind up misplacing the Weaver stuff, and then wind up having to buy new when I needed it. :)

He definately "gets it".

Sickos. Of course, the Libtards are gonna blame the guns. We may be in for some rough times.

I haven't used a tipoff mount in eons. Nothing wrong with them IMO. It's just that Weaver (Picatinny) is the standard, so it's a lot easier to change optics down the road. For example, if you want to change to a red dot later, and a mount is included, it will be for Weaver style mounts.   You can always add them later, right?

I've dealt with the FCC enforcement guys quite a bit over the years. With very few exeptions, they are very good engineers, and fair guys to boot. "Willful and repeated" means you're gonna pay, and the fines are seldom (if ever) light.   When I get a call from those guys (usually aviation interference), I drop everything and verify my stuff is clean. I'm never the source of the interference, but I fire up the spectrum analyzer and confirm. Even if I was the source, they wouldn't fine me unless I failed to correct the issue in a timely fashion.   This guy interfered with a government frequency, and the FCC ruled that he did it on purpose. I hate it for him, but don't blame the FCC one bit (unless I missed something in the article). The FCC enforcement guys exist for situations like this. They may reduce the fine if he can show hardship, but I doubt seriously that they will reverse the NAL. They're used to excuses, and their BS stamp is usually final.