mikegideon

  It hard to screw up buying S&W.

  It's better than changing the law just to eliminate douchebaggery

It's another one of those cases where the "man" can't lose. Even if this guy get's off completely, he probably won't carry a slung AR through the mall again.

  Stupid used to have consequences. Now... you get a free cell phone.

It's a good thing she didn't shoot herself  :rolleyes:

  I know what they're trying to do. That's doesn't mean they will succeed. I appreciate you handling my PR for me as well. Fact is, I've worked in media all my life, and would get fired for being the idiot on TV. So, somebody else is gonna have to do it in my place.

  I haven't been turned by the anti's, and I never get called "that idiot on TV". I'm at war with the anti's. I figure they win if I'm the one that looks stupid. Guess we will just have to agree to disagree.

  Whatever you say

  Do what you want, man. My AR's will be cased in public. This ain't about handguns.

  Unfortunately, you're not the only one asking that question right now. If they do pass a law, it won't just cover malls. We can't forget that this case isn't a gun charge. It's a dumbass charge. That's a good thing in my book.

  I'm not saying we should give up. I want to see guns in the windows of pickup trucks again. That's how I grew up. I'm saying... don't provide ammunition to the enemy. That's stupid, and usually costly.

  Nothing wrong with open carrying where is doesn't cause problems. That statement is redundant. If you trigger a panic, then YOU have screwed up.

Welcome! Lots of guns and computers in Nashville. It's a good place :)

  Ask Rightwinger. My 458 upper only took 6 months. Awesome product, though

  And RRA will teach you the virtue of patience like no other gun manufacturer can :)

The media and the anti gun crowd have done a good job of turning the AR-15 into a scary image to the average person. Any time one of US scares the public with one, it hurts US. The fight is hard enough as it is. Worse than that is all the folks that justify it because they think we're entitled to do stupid shit because of our constitutional "rights".   Maybe it wouldn't bother me so much if I hadn't donated quite a bit of money to the sane fight against the anti's. Every time some clown sets us back, I feel like it costs me personally.

I just got a PST 6-24 x 50 FFP. Haven't had a chance to shoot with it yet, but it's some nice glass. I got the MOA version.

  I heard it from a high power shooter. But, maybe he was just wrong. I have some 80's and 82's. Too bad I took my rifle apart to build a grendel.

  The 90 is a different critter

  I have a high speed match on the first Grendel, and an SSA-e on the second. So, you'll get to squeeze the two best choices. I may need to load up a few more rounds, since I only planned on one rifle when I made up the ammo. That's a fast process. I'll give you a call when I think I can see a break in the weather.

  if you're gonna go low recoil, you're gonna be better off with something like a 6BR. A 223 has kinda short legs, even shooting 80 VLD's.

  Balance is pretty easy. Ain't no shortage of AR trinkets, and they all add weight. You may be able to offset that extra 1 1/2 with some spare batteries in the grip, or a different stock, or...

  It has been worth it to me. I have 4 of his triggers. You will see the quality when you open the bag. Pricey, but a good value.

  I've been around quite a few judges over the years. I don't recall one that would let it get thru his BS filter. Everything just ain't big enough to go to the Supreme Court.

  They're going to argue the constitution over a disturbing the peace charge? You're shittin' me, right?