Pain103

I had this discussion with TWRA previously about carrying on the priest. None I spoke to could care less about a responsible person carrying especially concealed. It's the drunks and dangerous boaters they were worried about. But good to know they helped you out.

You get the benny of being considered a resident of two states.

I mean the brace ruling worked out so well for them.

It was Sgt. William Cherry that was killed. His funeral was today.

That's why you make sure you live in the general services district of Davidson County if must live in that county.

Yeah you're not going to be around $500 for that. If it was my vehicle only and my fault, I wouldn't claim it. You could go ahead and get some quotes and give the guy a week to come up with the money but doubt it will happen. I would just assume I was filing under my insurance. Have you read the crash report yet to ensure no insurance was documented? He may not be the vehicle owner and there is insurance coverage.

Not bad, as having investigated self-defense shootings I do appreciate number 1. Many people don't want to say anything initially which is ok but if I know at least a little something it helps me produce a working theory of how it occurred and allows me to picture the scene better. This is actually pretty standard practice among law enforcement, give a brief what happened, then contact attorney and give interview after a few days. I definitely don't fault anyone for getting an attorney because I would. As far as avoidance I think some people or areas believe too much into this. As long as you are somewhere lawfully you have no duty to avoid or retreat, but it does tend to help. Worked a case where the victim attempted to avoid confrontation twice by driving away. Suspect followed and went for number three and found himself on the losing end of a bullet. DA agreed to the self-defense claim and first thing that was said was something to the effect of wow he tried to leave twice, and this guy kept coming. But on the other hand, if you know certain events are going to happen or more likely to happen and you avoid putting yourself voluntarily in that situation it looks better. May not change anything about the legal outcome but probably helps the image. My personal opinion only is maybe throwing some verbal warnings in there if possible.

We do have some drones assigned to various personnel, but I don't know that you would get much heat signature from certain things we are looking for and the canopy coverage in some of these counties makes using a drone ineffective as searching by foot.

I investigate homicides and missing persons as some of my job duties. Not a recreational activity.

So, I'm interested in opinions or reviews of handheld GPS units. I'm looking for one eventually to put in my pack I use when having to search terrain for evidence/bodies. Primarily ease of use and be able to mark points of interest like spots where certain items were located and be able to give those coordinates to aircraft or other people. Any help on where to start would be appreciated. I don't even know if this is a feature but if I could use it to track path already covered would help.

They ended up getting sent to club fed.

That sucks. Good luck with it. I almost wonder if you have some matches to someone with a criminal record and it's flagging you like an alias or the same person. I mean I've seen criminal histories over the years pull possible matches with same names and DOB similar or pull alias the suspect used with a dob that actually is a person. Once that gets entered its there forever. I mean within 10 minutes of reading it usually a human can tell its not the same person when the confirm everything to the other pages. Either way good luck it's a shame it happens.

Is there way to clear up the issue that is getting you flagged? Not trying to ask your business but if it something you could get fixed like maybe a disposition to a case that was never sent in might be worth the hassle to get someone to do their job.

Permit covers handguns. I think this past session there was a bill to allow loaded long guns but failed.

I listened to the clip and there really isn't anything seems like a big deal. They have people working security oh well just like everyone else. They have training on media and what they call bird dogging, guess what you can get that too. Maybe there is more in the full recording, but that small clip isn't anything earth shattering. Just imagine if all these so-called gun rights organizations were to organize people to intelligentially and peacefully protest and educate people. But they could care less about the perception they have and what they could really do stop people from just being fed that evil gun is going to kill somebody.

About a year ago I started listening to podcasts. Didn't think I would enjoy it but fortunately I do, it also helps the radio likes to play the same 10 songs so doesn't take much not to want to listen the mainstream channels. Currently I enjoy Mike Drop podcast with Mike Ritland and The Shawn Ryan Show. I have started reading Mike Ritland's book Unf*ck America. Nice listening to people who can understand others have views that may at times oppose but be respectful and just let people live.

Pain was due to some back pain after a drunk driver slammed into the back of patrol car one night. The 103 was the badge number back then.

PM inbound

I don't know John Harris, so I have no impression of John good or bad. But he chose to make himself a public figure and with that the crap you post on social media is under a microscope. If you want to be in a position of influence or trust society has chosen, you lose some self-expression. Things could be posted for one reason but if any one person could possibly interpret it as something different, you're screwed. I've known multiple cops of different races post things that I thought nothing of because of knowing them but got hammered by media to push an image that make them seem racist or antigovernment. That being said I know Phil Williams is in the business of getting ratings and he will. I still don't blindly believe anything I see on the news.

Unfortunately, they won't. To those companies anything less than 5 to 6 figures isn't worth the time. They typically won't send someone to testify on behalf of the company and that will get a case dismissed instantly. Most investigators know this and won't proceed forward on behalf of the company without assurance they will attend. Now if you as a person had someone stopped locally with your card info loaded onto another card with a strip that's an easy case as long as you the victim attends court.

He just came across as a badass in several roles.

I just glanced over it a few minutes ago. Section 3 (i) mentions clarifying the definition for FFL and requiring that background check. No surprise there I'm amazed it hasn't been done by now. But again with the whole rule thing if something is going to made illegal it should be voted on by the legislators. I think this is why we keep having these shenanigans with rulings like bump stock or braces.

I'm waiting on the designation that if you sell more than "x" number of guns you are considered to be a dealer. I could realistically see that coming with where a rule is made that anyone that sell more than say 2 guns a year you must be an FFL and comply with background checks.

What drone do you have? I use to fly a Mini SE for my last department and loved it. I'm thinking about getting back into it and buying my own, but I think I would go bigger.

Sound like a real life need for a pistol brace! For real sucks but I'm sure it can be done but I almost think you might need to try shooting pistols with your other hand. It's easy for me to say that being right-handed but left eye dominant I can shoot pistols with either hand no problem. But I'm trying to imagine having a solid grip missing that section of the middle finger may make things difficult. How far down are you talking like between first and second knuckle?