towerclimber37
-
Posts
3,345 -
Joined
-
Feedback
0%
Content Type
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Posts posted by towerclimber37
-
-
I guess Im not an average Joe.
I am! Condi rice and Sarah Palin..wow..that would be something!
you'd set 2 more records in one year..3 if you count the first female VP..
not only that, they'd have more experience than the current administration and their czars combined!
-
So, we're still fighting the civil war are we? Sweet.
It's comforting to know one can own slaves without being a racist.
I'm proud of my southern heritage, proud of my ancestors who fought for the south, but I would never exhibit the stars and bars publicly. For whatever reasons, some of which you allude to, it has become a symbol of racism to most people. It is hurtful. It would lead them to make incorrect negative assumptions about me--at best that I was an ignorant redneck, at worst that I was also a racist. I see no point in indulging in self-defamation.. I would submit that, if you are going to display it, you should be eager to explain to those who might call you racist why it means something different to you. Enlightenment and understanding might occur. I could respect that.
If you were to resort to fisticuffs, your victim would likely file assault charges and you would end up in jail with black roommates having a party on your backside. Some irony there.
and the color of my room mate would matter why? Is it fair to say that I can infer from that statement that you wouldn't mind if it was a white room mate having a party on your backside Ralph, but a black room mate would upset you?
help me out here.
I think that you estimate that I care what color someone's skin is. that's pretty sad and it shows that you're not very bright, however intelligent you think you may be.
Folks who know me know better. as for the assault charges, yah and? I'm already a domestic terrorist, a racist and an all around bad guy because I served in the military and didn't vote democrat. What's an assault charge? It would be worth it to me, just to punt someone like that off the planet.
hey, Ralph, are you sure you're not a census man? you look quite a bit like one...
As for who is who and what is what, just who is the victim? when you apply a term such as racist, you're not trying to change someone's mind, you're not trying to show them the error of their ways..that can be done in a gentler manner. no..you're looking for confrontation.
I am rarely eager to do anything..but if they asked, I'd explain why any particular flag or item is displayed on my property or in my home.
and no, you don't have to hate the color of someone's skin to have them as a slave. if that were the case the white slave trade would be much larger than it is now.
-
Hyaloid, this is politics. The racist label has been used simply because liberals don't like the opposing view. any viewpoint that dissents will be given a racist brand.
The way I see it, when liberal democrats stop getting their panties in a wad over facts that they don't like, they'll stop the name calling. I don't look for it soon though, since this is an tactic that's straight out of the "rules for radicals" handbook by Saul Alinsky.
step 1. personalize step 2. ridicule step 3. overwhelm.
when civility can no longer be guaranteed by good manners and decent morals then a nice crack on the head will have to do.
Many folks take their cue's from what they see on television..and they see many political figures that veil their insults, take the moral high ground by eshewing discourse because they're "better" than the opposing view, or they outright lie and attempt to brazen their way through a debate.
I submit that this is the wrong thing to do! stick to the facts, leave the name calling out of it.
During the Bush administration, Liberals called the president all sorts of vile names.
Democrats not only called him a liar and a loser on national television but during his speech to the house, where he was also greeted with catcalls and jeers. yet Joe Wilson is the only one to be censured?
This time around, many conservatives are using the same tactics.
notice the "joker" posters that many on the right are using.
they are ridiculing the left and the left doesn't like it, so they use a more vile name. One thing I've noticed is that many liberals are quick to make wild accusations without the facts where many conservatives are hesitant to do so. Now days? both sides are spewing rhetoric and names. The left doesn't like it and the Right has wondered why they didn't do this before.
I will tell you now..No good can come of this. words have just as much consequences as actions do and you can't take either of them back.
-
I'm going to go with Unique for 1 simple yet important reason.
Unique isn't as dense. it's harder for you to double charge a case with unique powder.
it burns a bit dirty but other than that it's a good powder to use.
if you're just starting out with reloading (and I am) then stick to the KISS method.
-
I dunno..I wish JC Watts and Sarah Palin would get together on a ticket.
On the funny side of it, I finally saw JC Watts on a Talk show the other day for the first time and I thought to myself "GD that's an ugly man!!"..I've read so much about him and I've often thought highly of his decisions when he's tackled problems so it was a bit startling to see him and then realize that he's got a head like an egg and a face like a prize fighter.
That's ok though..he's got a Keen mind and integrity..that's more than most folks in congress have right now!
-
Is this what we've come to? Che would be proud.:rolleyes:
you can't spell Douche without the Che!
This is a clear example of the far left attempting to secure their political future by imprinting their beliefs on the children of today. Trust me folks..this type of thing works!
I find it despicable. NO president has business teaching our children anything.
I submit that if a teacher can't keep their political ideals out of kindegarden, then they have no business being there.
Politics are for grownups. that's our responsibility. they have other pressing matters..like playing on the playground and learning how to write the number 3.
-
You're right, I wouldn't dare. I know that would not be an intelligent conversation. You missed my entire point and your jump to violence only furthers the problem. You have proven there is no room for further discussion on this issue. I don't want to fight you or anybody.
If you don't want to fight someone, then speak to them with a modicum of respect. I got your point loud and clear. Now you want to take that "moral high ground" by saying you don't want to fight, then act as if I can't carry on an intelligent conversation?
Horse****. you want to insult someone and get away with it because you don't agree with their views.
The idea that all southern folks are ignorant simply because we're always ready to fight?
Direct violence, while not pleasant, has solved MORE disputes than any other means in recorded history.
so you can turn your nose up in the air and act as if you're "superior" because,naturally us cavemen can't hold in intelligent conversation because we're too busy holding our clubs.
I'll let you in on a little secret. don't tell anyone though..
that ploy doesn't work...it just hastens a beatdown because it's another insult.
if you want intelligent conversation, stop with the insults. how simple is that??
-
I think that one of the reasons I oppose this particular administration is that I've seen it before...to to be more specific, I've seen the handiwork of this type of administration.
Children, so skinny that you can see rib bones plainly, too tired to shoo the flies away from their faces, because they're caloric intake was not that of a healthy child. Walking through a village or town I'd often times people behind shuttered entrances or windows, peering out afraid to be seen because if they're seen, they know they'll be singled out for 'education'.
Men who look at you with downcast eyes, all the pride beaten out of them...afraid to look because they'd lose what little they had and all they had was family.
I've seen this kind of administration. They make up their laws as they go along. If something doesn't go to their liking they 'legislate' it until it does.
yeah..If seen these people's work.
The men SHOULD have been ashamed, not afraid...but their fear kept them from acting when they could have made a difference.
instead of exposing the corruption and standing up to the bullies, they allowed them to flourish. Finally when the bullies were too powerful, they accepted defeat.
Meh.
Vote, people. require accountability of your politicians.
if they don't act responsibly, vote them out.
-
It's already starting.
One can profess the individual innocence of a federal worker. well and good, but because of the policies of a tyrannical government he works for he is complicit in the tyranny.
I don't advocate that our government is now a tyranny, but if half the bills that they want to pass DO get passed, then it will be.
with the 'nerf' of the vote by acorn's voter fraud, one avenue of the people to redress wrongs was removed.
If the right to oppose government policies via the airwaves is removed yet another avenue of the right to redress wrongs will be removed.
If they pass a bill that forbids oral dissent then I would think the final avenue of redress will have been removed and the only thing the government can expect is armed insurrection.
As for the distinction between islamic terrorists and domestic terrorists?
Islamic terrorists seek to change this country into a theocracy and enslave it's people. they are foreigners to our soil and do not care for the welfare of its' people.
Domestic terrorists (just like me) actually love this land and many have lived here for generations, with many ancestors that have paid a high price to see it succeed. They care for the individual freedoms for each citizen and actually care for them regardless of their beliefs.
61 years old eh? clear proof that age doesn't always impart wisdom.
-
I'll be the first to admit that about the ONLY good thing Bush did was to protect the U.S.
I didn't care for his domestic policies at all.
still, he never attempted to pass laws that would prohibit oral dissent about his policies. he simply moved the protesters. Obama had done quite a bit worse..
and you're welcome to report me as well, to the whitehouse snitch hotline..when you do tell them that I think the current Administration AND it's supporters are a bunch of Race pedaling poverty pimps. (I stole that line from JC Watts..but it fits them to a T).
-I've been called a racist, a domestic terrorist, I've been threatened with "investigation", Law enforcement officials have been told to BOLO for any folks who believe as I do. The government has jacked up taxes, made it almost impossible to find a job (I think it's interesting that I lost MY job right around the time that Obama got elected...but I worked for one of those "eeevil corporations)
-the government (Bush is JUST as culpable) took my money to bail out a car company, which now says that it won't be able to pay back at LEAST 80 BILLION dollars of the money loaned to it.
- The government promised that with this "stimulus package" that unemployment wouldn't go past 8%. It's pushing 10% now.
-The government promised universal health care and in that bill gave the IRS the right to fine INDIVIDUALS as well as businesses if they don't carry a health care plan that is approved by the government..yet the same people who want to pass this bill don't want to use it. not only that but the people pushing this bill are the same folks who advocate death panels (thanks Sarah, you were right on the money). As a matter of fact, the government is instituting a form of this right now in the VA.
I submit that my health is my business and if they keep this up they'd better start looking to their own health. If they decide to fine me for living my life in a manner I deem prudent then I'll be happy to suggest that they attempt self impregnation.
- Those same people have since, submitted an education bill that gives the dept of Education the discretion to give 500 MILLION dollars to
whomever they deem appropriate" to teach our children, when it's not there place to set a curriculum. Never has been.
with their morals (Sanford,spitzer,Boxer/Reid...pick one!! just about every one of them is a crook,adulterer, or some other type of criminal) they have no business saying a danged thing about what I teach my children. You can think what you like but most folks that I know will go to war over their kids..and won't feel bad about putting a bullet in someone over it..I'm one of them.
- Obama wants to institute a tax on cigarettes and beer, yet he promised that he'd not tax the middle class or the poor.
I don't know about you folks but I don't know ONE rich fella that stops by the store on the way home to pick up a 6 pack of beer and a pack of cigarettes so that he can wind down and relax his body after a punishing day at hard manual labor.
-it's no wonder that bodies are turning up now, of government workers.
I figure it's like this..only an idiot would poke a bear with a stick and then express wonder when the bear takes offense. Not just an idiot..an incredible idiot.
I can say one thing Ralf G Brisco. Under the Bush administration, he may have used the constitution as toilet paper but at least he didn't try to force the people to hand it to him so he could wipe and smile while they did it.
and I find it incredible that YOU are ready to do just that!
If you don't believe EVERYTHING I've said here is a fact, g'head...call me on it..I'll provide links to the exact PAGE of every BILL.
I'll also provide links to the youtube videos of every obama speech that supports these FACTS.
if I'm still a racist for calling it like I see it? then I guess dissent is the highest form of RACISM.
/rant
-
It's good to see you back!
Where ya been?
gallivantin
-
Not by definition, no.
Even if you would be mislabeled, and you truly are not racist, which you probably are not... that is a symbol of racism. It symbolizes the enslavement of our fellow human beings and it symbolizes the southern withdraw from the United States of America. I also understand it represents the life and death of many family members who bravely fought in TN...but why would you want to give people the wrong idea, if that isn't your true belief? Like it or not, that is how that particular symbol is viewed and nothing can change the cause that it stood for, enslavement of African-Americans and secession from the US. It's definitely a part of TN history, just not for a very humane reason. It's simply a different time now. That was a way of life then but not anymore. We get to choose how people label us and wearing very specific symbols, if that isn't your belief, simply seems like the wrong choice. You are begging people to mislabel you. There are other ways to honor ancestors and southern heritage.
I believe in your right to wear and display that flag. I believe in your right to be racist if you so choose. I also believe in your right to be open and honest about it.
wow...just wow
I quit reading this forum for awhile and I come back to THIS???
Colin P.
A little illumination for you. The major bone of contention among the southern states was not slavery. The congress had already agreed to allow a 20 year time frame for agrarian states to move away from forced labor.
The major bone of contention between southern states and northern states was over tarriffs.
You act as if racism is directly related to slavery. how can that be when 2/3'rd of the slaves that were sold to America were sold BY THEIR OWN PEOPLE?
And further, when the Union army came through the south, they burned plantations, and took crops from all, regardless of color. Aren't they also racists? because you can bet your bippy that the Union soldiers didn't share their food with the very folks that they just burned out of their homes.
If you would like, I can forward you the accounts of several slaves from the Jarrell plantation, in Ga. that recounts how, when the emancipation proclaimation was passed, they were made freemen and agreements were made for them to sharecrop. A few months later the union army came and "confiscated" all the food both from the larders and the fields, took all the animals they needed to feed their army and killed any they didn't take with them.
they took this food from sharecroppers and plantation owners alike and burned the houses. Better yet, if you're ever around Macon Ga. look up the Jarrell plantation.
Yet the Confederate battle flag is the symbol of racism. why? because it was politically expedient to paint those southern states as immoral in order to fight a war against secession. There were and still are racists in both the north and the south.
That was a stroke of Genius for the Union. Abraham Lincoln fanned the flames of hatred OF his countrymen AGAINST his countrymen. When the southern statesmen wanted to keep debating in congress to come to some sort of agreement, the northern states invoked cloture and effectively guaranteed a war. For that, I condemn Lincoln and hope he burns in a special hell.
So you keep on thinking that heritage = hate, but don't be surprised when you evoke a response stronger than you expect...and I can almost guarantee you won't speak those words to a person displaying a flag. that would be too much like paying for a whipping...and while you may be ignorant of many of the facts, I am fairly sure that you have the God given sense of self-preservation.
To many southerners who display a confederate battle flag, calling us Racist is an insult that's spoken by ignorant, self inflated carpet baggers; Were you to do this in person, I'm fairly sure you'd either have to back up your words with fisticuffs or expect a trip to the dentist.
-
A quick note about Rock Island Armory.
It's a Philippino company that got it's equipment from the original makers of the 1911. It still makes the 1911 to the original specs and has only in the last few years been making them offspec (like the RIA 1911 tactical).
they ARE great weapons and very affordable.
-
We all knew that the country accelerated its dive under Democratic leadership. When gas hit 4 bucks a gallon in some places..then the housing bubble collapsed and it was shown that the primary culprits were none other than democratic leaders. the big O himself among them!
Tim Geithner helps to make the dollar worth .10 LESS than the Canadian dollar.
Folks know it's happening, they KNOW who's responsible. What has entered their mind at some point in time is "WHY"?
well..Its kind of long, but here's a blueprint for it.
First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the "Cloward-Piven Strategy" seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
Inspired by the August 1965 riots in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles (which erupted after police had used batons to subdue a black man suspected of drunk driving), Cloward and Piven published an article titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty" in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. Following its publication, The Nation sold an unprecedented 30,000 reprints. Activists were abuzz over the so-called "crisis strategy" or "Cloward-Piven Strategy," as it came to be called. Many were eager to put it into effect.
In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when "the rest of society is afraid of them," Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would "the rest of society" accept their demands.
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven's early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. "Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
The authors noted that the number of Americans subsisting on welfare -- about 8 million, at the time -- probably represented less than half the number who were technically eligible for full benefits. They proposed a "massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls." Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be "a profound financial and political crisis" that would unleash "powerful forces … for major economic reform at the national level."
Their article called for "cadres of aggressive organizers" to use "demonstrations to create a climate of militancy." Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help. Carefully orchestrated media campaigns, carried out by friendly, leftwing journalists, would float the idea of "a federal program of income redistribution," in the form of a guaranteed living income for all -- working and non-working people alike. Local officials would clutch at this idea like drowning men to a lifeline. They would apply pressure on Washington to implement it. With every major city erupting into chaos, Washington would have to act.
This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements -- mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down. Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown -- providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change. That was the theory.
Cloward and Piven recruited a militant black organizer named George Wiley to lead their new movement. In the summer of 1967, Wiley founded the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO). His tactics closely followed the recommendations set out in Cloward and Piven's article. His followers invaded welfare offices across the United States -- often violently -- bullying social workers and loudly demanding every penny to which the law "entitled" them. By 1969, NWRO claimed a dues-paying membership of 22,500 families, with 523 chapters across the nation.
Regarding Wiley's tactics, The New York Times commented on September 27, 1970, "There have been sit-ins in legislative chambers, including a United States Senate committee hearing, mass demonstrations of several thousand welfare recipients, school boycotts, picket lines, mounted police, tear gas, arrests - and, on occasion, rock-throwing, smashed glass doors, overturned desks, scattered papers and ripped-out phones."These methods proved effective. "The flooding succeeded beyond Wiley's wildest dreams," writes Sol Stern in the City Journal. "From 1965 to 1974, the number of single-parent households on welfare soared from 4.3 million to 10.8 million, despite mostly flush economic times. By the early 1970s, one person was on the welfare rolls in New York City for every two working in the city's private economy."As a direct result of its massive welfare spending, New York City was forced to declare bankruptcy in 1975. The entire state of New York nearly went down with it. The Cloward-Piven strategy had proved its effectiveness.
The Cloward-Piven strategy depended on surprise. Once society recovered from the initial shock, the backlash began. New York's welfare crisis horrified America, giving rise to a reform movement which culminated in "the end of welfare as we know it" -- the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, which imposed time limits on federal welfare, along with strict eligibility and work requirements. Both Cloward and Piven attended the White House signing of the bill as guests of President Clinton.
Most Americans to this day have never heard of Cloward and Piven. But New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani attempted to expose them in the late 1990s. As his drive for welfare reform gained momentum, Giuliani accused the militant scholars by name, citing their 1966 manifesto as evidence that they had engaged in deliberate economic sabotage. "This wasn't an accident," Giuliani charged in a 1997 speech. "It wasn't an atmospheric thing, it wasn't supernatural. This is the result of policies and programs designed to have the maximum number of people get on welfare."
Cloward and Piven never again revealed their intentions as candidly as they had in their 1966 article. Even so, their activism in subsequent years continued to rely on the tactic of overloading the system. When the public caught on to their welfare scheme, Cloward and Piven simply moved on, applying pressure to other sectors of the bureaucracy, wherever they detected weakness.In 1982, partisans of the Cloward-Piven strategy founded a new "voting rights movement," which purported to take up the unfinished work of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Like ACORN, the organization that spear-headed this campaign, the new "voting rights" movement was led by veterans of George Wiley's welfare rights crusade. Its flagship organizations were Project Voteand Human SERVE, both founded in 1982. Project Vote is an ACORN front group, launched by former NWRO organizer and ACORN co-founder Zach Polett. Human SERVE was founded by Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, along with a former NWRO organizer named Hulbert James.
All three of these organizations -- ACORN, Project Vote and Human SERVE -- set to work lobbying energetically for the so-called Motor-Voter law, which Bill Clinton ultimately signed in 1993. The Motor-Voter bill is largely responsible for swamping the voter rolls with "dead wood" -- invalid registrations signed in the name of deceased, ineligible or non-existent people -- thus opening the door to the unprecedented levels of voter fraud and "voter disenfranchisement" claims that followed in subsequent elections.
The new "voting rights" coalition combines mass voter registration drives -- typically featuring high levels of fraud -- with systematic intimidation of election officials in the form of frivolous lawsuits, unfounded charges of "racism" and "disenfranchisement," and "direct action" (street protests, violent or otherwise). Just as they swamped America's welfare offices in the 1960s, Cloward-Piven devotees now seek to overwhelm the nation's understaffed and poorly policed electoral system. Their tactics set the stage for the Florida recount crisis of 2000, and have introduced a level of fear, tension and foreboding to U.S. elections heretofore encountered mainly in Third World countries.
-
Toba,
Mike is right. as much as you'd like to get them to stop what they're doing, they're not actively attempting to endanger your life.
they're doing that through stupidity and reckless driving, but I'm willing to bet that they're not singling you out for it.
stay out of their way, let them pass. if you can get a tag number, call it in when you get the chance. THAT is the way to handle it.
I know JUST how you feel though...and if it were legal to do it any other way, you can bet your bippy I'd say go for it. Its simply NOT worth the trouble you might buy into to do it any other way.
just my .2 cents.
-
AAAaaand another mention here.
Washington drops hammer on state gun plan
I've been following this as closely as the rest of you guys. I can only hope that the legislators of Tennessee will actually stand up and say enough is enough, and give our 10th amendment rights some backbone.
-
thats the point i was making. it is impossible to get sweet tea or grits once you cross the mason-dixon line.
I once asked for a glass of sweet tea at breakfast, in a restaraunt in mn. one winter. the waitress looked at me and the other fella and said "it's not in season right now".
I explained that it wasn't exactly a deer and she could always make some if she were so inclined.
she said "but I'd have to make a gallon of it!" My friend looked at me and we both looked at her when he said "that sounds about right.." I assented.
she still refused to make it.
I thought "these people are idiots."
perhaps I'm wrong..but I don't think so.
-
75% yes
25% no 591 votes so far...
-
Matthew, while I appreciate & share your enthusiasm for the second amendment, even I (the one who argued ferociously against any Restaurant Carry curfew or restrictions) think there are some valid reasons why we can't let just anyone walk around our Government leaders without a security clearance, & having a deadly weapon on them.. It's just common sense.. There are certainly those out there who would like to silence some of our leaders by force. So, in the interest of maintaining a society that is lawful & not anarchist, I think its reasonable to support maintaining some level of security around our leaders.
let them buy a gun and carry it..that's what we do!
the idea that they are some how "special" is a load of crap. If one of them were to get offed, you can bet your bippy that there's 20 more waiting in line to take his/her place.
-
I do think that the OP knows by now that it is a non-venomous Corn snake and that they are great for keeping out rodents... he has been told many times over the past 11 pages (cannot find the beating dead horse emoticon), but I will say for his side, he didn't know it at the time and if I came on a snake that I thought was a copperhead (though I know what one looks like and would have caught it instead) I would have killed it too. Not because I am afraid of them, but because I have 2 young kids. One of whom loves snakes (at 2 yrs old, can you believe it!!!) I know that even the venomous snakes serve their purpose, but I would rather a king, rat, or corn snake serve that purpose on my property in it's place. So I do think we should stop hounding him about how he killed a safe snake and that he mis-identified. Simple mistake among people that don't know a whole lot about them.
no no..just ONE more hounding..
Just kidding...but it was funny!
No worries. chances are that you'll find another come winter time. I found one at Mark@sea's place one winter. well..I didn't find IT, I found where it had shed its skin. Sue had a fit until I explained that it's a good snake and would make her mouse traps obsolete, and furthermore, if she hadn't seen the snake by now then chances are she'd never find it..(it was crawling around in the wall and floor spaces exterminating rats and growing like all get out).
-
Good deal!
Thanks Greg.
These will definitely be plinking rounds..so I doubt I'll get the best accuracy out of them. the bullet weights seem to fluctuate between 206 grain all the way to 211 grain..I figure I can use a formula for a heavier bullet weight and I should be ok as long as I don't load them with the maximum load.
I may make a batch with your load as well and see how it fares.
-
got it! thanks...that's a good idea..and one I'd considered. I was just hoping that someone had the data out there.
-
hey! if someone is interested in the lee carbide dies, I have a set I'd be willing to part with. I don't own a .40 caliber pistol and these do little good for me.
I believe the cost of the dies was 28.00.
If someone decides to buy it I'll throw in 100 copper jacketed bullets.
I bought the reloading gear from Marswolf, way back when and since I don't reload .40 cal. I don't need these dies.
-
I have a box of 1000 210 grain Lead cast semi wadcutter bullets. I'd like to reload them into .45 LC, using unique powder but I can't find load data for it.
Does anyone have load data for this load?
I've looked at the Unique website and THEY don't have it. I know the new lee reloaders manual would have it..so, can someone clue me in?
:rolleyes:
24th Annual Gun Rights Policy Conference
in 2A Legislation and Politics
Posted
Mike, I would say that fella has an excellent point!
let us know how the rest of the conference goes, will ya?