Capbyrd

I use Flickr and it recognizes those fine. I've also noticed it from other sources.

All ham bands don't require repeaters to achieve distance. HF commonly talks around the world transceiver to transceiver. UHF and VHF require conditions to be right to achieve any kind of distance to rival HF but it can be done. What you are talking about with the repeaters is your more local 2m guys. It's the entry level license and really allows a lot. Also, a lot of hams dabble in battery power for their setups. They have the equipment to just need a car battery for power.

It's not that. He's hosting elsewhere. The problem is that the forum software isn't automatically recognizing his links as being to an image file.

I just wish Mother Nature would have sent a meteor instead. I'm all about the big purge. I've said for years that Earth is overpopulated. Get em Momma Nature!

they better pay me for my stock too

So I've been reading in some places that SB Tactical is making this brace for Q. It is made by SB but is a Q product. Q never got an approval letter from the ATF for it but instead was just thinking that SB Tactical's existing approvals would suffice. SB never submitted this brace because it isn't one of their products. So because there was never any approval for the brace itself, there was never any approval for the "pistol" as a whole.

If murdering 25 children didn't get them disbanded, nothing will.

There is no doubt in my mind that this is a direct attempt at getting rid of braces.

Q Press Release ATF Letter to Q

So I just gone done skimming the 1500 pages of the official agreements. Roundhill's bid is contingent on Vista being the successful bidder for the ammunition business. I also saw where Ruger's bid was 30 million for Marlin. I didn't see where any real estate was included in that sale but lots of machinery, tooling, parts and IP. The interesting part of the IP for me is this. Patent Numbers 10,254,063 and 10,718,584. Both patents are described as "ROTARY MAGAZINE WITH BOLT HOLD OPEN ASSEMBLY." Did Ruger just pay 30 million for those two patents?

It wouldn't make sense for Ruger to spend money to build something that they already own.

It doesn't apply to us because the ATF requires that it be updated every five years. Our HCPs have a number of things that don't allow us that exemption. 1. Underage HCP (18-20 year olds) 2. Lifetime HCP 3. 8 Year renewal And then of course, whether the state background check for HCP satisfies the requirements of federal background check is in the air. I don't believe that it currently does but I do not know.

I'll be there weekend before Thanksgiving. But if it's 10/22 related, I can't guarantee that it won't get lost in transit.

I love Bob's signature on there.

Glad I'm not the only one that noticed dad isn't exactly up to snuff.

I’ve done way worse. Stuff happens. If your pistol can’t handle hittin the ground, why haven’t you switched away from 1911s yet?

I'm sorry your daddy was so uppity. She didn't toss one of her daddy's firearms, she tossed one of hers. It's a tool, not a Faberge egg, it will be fine.

Citation?

Also, you still got the F4i?

That's the reason that I still operate under once a rifle, always a rifle. I don't trust anything that says you can go back and forth and I don't advise that people do so. If you have a lawyer that will defend you say go for it, cool. But I don't and I ain't.

Sounds like you already know the answers. So why are you asking? The real answer is that 0 people that have posted in this thread are lawyers, and less than 0 of us are NFA specific lawyers. You should seek out advice from someone that can defend you when the BATFE decides you were wrong, or changes their mind because the wind blew or the sun came out.

I have not procreated and I do not own goats.

dual purpose. scope clearancing and recoil mitigation.

Everyone knows that scopes work best the closer they are to the bore. I've been thinking about shaving some more off the top to get even lower.