volshayes
Active Member-
Posts
538 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2 -
Feedback
100%
Content Type
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Everything posted by volshayes
-
Concealed Carry Insurance?
volshayes replied to tgtmasterchuck's topic in Handgun Carry and Self Defense
I am using U.S. LawShield out of Texas. John Harris is also one of their attorneys. They cover incidents where you are in fear of death or bodily harm and use your weapon, if you are in a place where it is legal to possess a weapon. If you happen to be found guilty, they will still cover your costs and even cover appeals. I don't believe there are many that will do that. If you want to speak with them, here is their website: https://www.uslawshield.com/ -
Definitive credible, easy to understand resource?
volshayes replied to billyblazes's topic in Handgun Carry and Self Defense
Ditto on what DaveTN said. Read the statutes for yourself. You can find them here: https://advance.lexis.com/container?config=014CJAA5ZGVhZjA3NS02MmMzLTRlZWQtOGJjNC00YzQ1MmZlNzc2YWYKAFBvZENhdGFsb2e9zYpNUjTRaIWVfyrur9ud&crid=5679cfc0-a380-47cc-8adb-2ecd1aaf1df1 Select Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13. I try to read it after July 1st every year. The State Legislature convenes in January of each year and usually ends sometime in May. Most bills they pass become effective July 1st of that same year. That's why I wait until after July 1st. However, they do make some exceptions on their effective dates depending upon the legislation passed. There are also Attorney General Opinions that affect how the laws are interpreted. They are harder to locate. You can find them here: https://www.tn.gov/attorneygeneral/opinions.html and follow the instructions under "How do I search for an opinion if I do not know the number or when it was issued?" -
Ditto on that. It could have gone all kinds of wrong, but it didn't. Only the person fleeing got it. On the other hand, if they had tried to pit him, or just kept the pursuit going without gun fire until he finally decided to stop, that could have gone all kinds of wrong, too. Goes back to the old saying, "You just had to be there." That might give an entirely different perspective on the whole situation.
-
This is one wild ride. My guess is that Anaheim PD will probably be changing their rules about engaging from a moving vehicle. https://www.officer.com/on-the-street/body-cameras/news/21079810/video-shows-anaheim-police-officers-fire-76-shots-during-highspeed-pursuit?utm_source=Officer.com+Newsday+E-Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS190509012&o_eid=5113J4674090I4J&rdx.ident[pull]=omeda|5113J4674090I4J&oly_enc_id=5113J4674090I4J
-
Thanks for the info. Those are good prices, too for leather
-
What a waste of a nice Caprice !
-
You said you came to Tennessee in 1998. There is a long history waaaaaaay before 1998 of Smyrna being one of Tennessee's biggest speed traps. It was on the main highway to Nashville before the Interstate was built and greatly supplemented the local economy. When the Interstate came through, it killed off some of that revenue. I don't know how it is today. I haven't been down there in years. From what you said above, it sounds like it hasn't improved a lot.
-
If the laws aren't enforced, there is no need in having them. I would imagine that the Patrolman would never have thought that he would have to use any kind of force on a seatbelt infraction. Normal people would have taken the ticket and gone on about their business. Unfortunately, there's always those few who think the law does not apply to them and they can do whatever they want.
-
She admitted she made a mistake. She was going for her Taser. It was a bad mistake. However, it would have never gotten to that point had he just taken the ticket and gone to court to argue his point there. Police cannot let someone go just because a person feels they don't deserve a ticket. There would be no need for traffic laws if that were the case. Two ways this could have been prevented. (1) He could have worn his seatbelt. If he didn't like the seatbelt law, he could have contacted his legislative representatives, argued his case, and ask that they change the laws. (2) Take the ticket and go to court to state his case there like most rational people would have done.
-
Unfortunately, looks bad for her, but if he had just done what the Police said in the first place, it would have never happened. Moral to the story: Save the argument for court, not the street. https://www.officer.com/on-the-street/vehicles-equipment/in-car-video/news/21073399/dashcam-video-released-from-officerinvolved-shooting-during-kansas-traffic-stop?utm_source=Officer.com+Newsday+E-Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS190326031&o_eid=5113J4674090I4J&rdx.ident[pull]=omeda|5113J4674090I4J&ajs_uid=5113J4674090I4J&oly_enc_id=5113J4674090I4J&ajs_trait_oebid=5902A2468689B2E
-
I don't know if you are interested in online sales, but here's a couple of websites that I have corresponded with in the past, although I haven't purchased one from them yet. They at least seemed to be responsive to questions that I asked of them. https://ssdinternationalinc.com/product-category/firearms/?filter_brands=smith-wesson http://www.vancesle.com/category.cfm/brand/SMITH-AND-WESSON
-
Steve Dickerson (R-Nashville) to Introduce Red Flag Bill
volshayes replied to Garufa's topic in 2A Legislation and Politics
From the NRA. Tennessee: Setting the Record Straight on “Red Flag” Legislation Recently, a representative of a Tennessee based fundraising group that purports to support the Second Amendment has been implying that the NRA supports so-called “red flag” legislation that would deny gun owners their Second Amendment rights without due process. To be clear, the NRA strongly opposes SB 1178 /HB 1446, and SB 943 /HB 1049, as well as any other so-called “red flag” bills that would deny an individual their Second Amendment rights without due process. Please contact the members of the Senate Judiciary Committee and urge them to OPPOSE SB 1178. SB1178, sponsored by Senator Steven Dickerson, will be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, March 26th. This egregious gun control bill seeks to create an avenue by which gun owners could lose their gun rights following an ex-parte hearing where the gun owner would have no opportunity to challenge the claims being made by a petitioner. A gun owner who has an order issued against them would have no ability to transfer their firearms to a third party. Further, this bill includes vague definitions of relationships without timeframes where someone could petition for an order against someone they have not seen or lived with in 40 years. NRA opposed similar legislation, Senate Bill 670, during the 2018 legislative session. These bills do not respect a citizen’s right to due process and the NRA strongly opposes this legislation as we always have. Again, don’t let disingenuous fundraising efforts divide Second Amendment supporters in Tennessee with erroneous claims and shallow scare tactics. -
6,012 Yds ! https://www.ssusa.org/articles/2019/3/5/team-global-precision-group-hits-6012-yard-target/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=insider&utm_campaign=0319
-
DNA Links Suspect in 1999 Alabama Cold Case Murder
volshayes replied to volshayes's topic in General Chat
Not to mention the hackers you have to worry about too. I would imagine they could cause havoc in a database like that if they ever got into it. -
Thank goodness that we have some checks and balances to stop this now. If these people ever get control back of the House, Senate, and Presidency, the 2nd Amendment will be shredded.
-
You would think criminals would have learned by now not to send their DNA to genealogy websites. https://www.officer.com/investigations/forensics/dna-technologies/news/21072354/dna-links-suspect-in-1999-alabama-cold-case-murder?utm_source=Officer.com+Newsday+E-Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS190318010&o_eid=5113J4674090I4J&rdx.ident[pull]=omeda|5113J4674090I4J&ajs_uid=5113J4674090I4J&oly_enc_id=5113J4674090I4J&ajs_trait_oebid=5902A2468689B2E
-
Those stories that happen everyday that have nothing to do with illegal immigrants are definitely hard to stop. The stories that do involve illegal immigrants are much easier to stop. If the criminal element are not allowed here, they can't murder anyone. That's an easy fix, good border security, vetting who enters the country, can stop these incidents. Protecting our own citizens comes first, at least for me.