Chucktshoes

I can’t say for certain that what you’re asking for is illegal, but it’s definitely very close to that line. You need to acquire a jig and perform the work yourself.

I’ll take the blame on this one. My bad. That said we’ve been due for a hard pivot thread derailment. It’s been a while since the last one.

I don’t know what, if any, biases statista hold. Everytown on the other hand is a Bloomberg funded organization created for the sole purpose of enacting gun control so its biases are a known quantity. One is a data set of unknown quality. The other is a data set that is extremely suspect in its veracity due to the strong bias of its source.

You do have an ignore button. I’m a proponent of making use of it if one finds another person’s posts a problem. Sadly, I gave that up when I became a mod.

No, no public voting of that. Not how we do things around here. We have been an echo chamber for long stretches of time. It’s why I am so happy when diverse worldviews arrive and help us not to be that.

I asked a direct question in hopes of getting a clear and direct answer for once. Thank you for providing that. While I absolutely don’t agree with your views (at least as I understand them) I can see the merit in your aims. I will suggest altering your technique. If it seems as if I have changed from being initially supportive of your presence upon your return to expressing disdain there is a reason for that. Your posting style as of late has been more indicative of someone interested in trolling as opposed to legitimate discussion and exchange of ideas. If you’re actually looking to engage with folks here in an honest manner, then do so in a direct and honest manner instead of throwing shade and #### posting. Diversity in thought and even contrarian viewpoints are valuable to any community. The problem is when those views are expressed in a manner designed to elicit anger and sow discord. It is the reason that we eliminated the general politics sub forum. It did not bring anything positive or contribute to the overall health of the community. Even in a place that is mostly leaning in a similar direction, it just ended in needless fights. So stow the general/world politics posts. They’re not welcome. Getting back to the main point, how about more posts like your last? That’s what I was hoping to see from you when you returned with an obviously contrarian worldview. If you want to be an actual part of of this community, I know I personally want you to be, heterodox views and all. If you’re just going to go back to stirring up mess with no purpose, you won’t have to leave voluntarily.

Who seems to use your ownership of guns in the same way that folks like Tim Kennedy use their “I am a veteran“ card to advocate for gun control or the way that some people will use the “I have a black friend” card as a shield. While you may own guns, you seem to come here solely to advocate against them and shove general politics into anything you can. Considering this is a forum dedicated to talking about firearms and expanding firearms rights, I will ask again. Why are you here?

So if you don’t have any actual interest in firearms, why are you slumming it around here amongst us?

Good breakdown and commentary from Breaking Points about the event.

Everyone is always quick to find some way to ties these wack jobs to their ideological opponents, but the truth is that they’re normally just wack jobs. As always, the best idea is to simply wait for the information to come out. Making an informed judgement is so much better for every reason.

Nobody cares what you think about foreign politics.

Did the lifetime as well. Doubt it’ll save me any money, but it sure saves hassle. My wife will likely my money’s worth at least.

They’re looking to get fast tracked back to SCOTUS.

The answer to that is he’s a felon who can’t own guns. I’m not terribly interested in his ideas on regulating them out of the hands than can.

It doesn’t me. Firearms should be a non-partisan issue. What I dislike is seeing folks who used to believe in the 2A advocating for greater firearms restrictions. “Good for me, but not for thee” types really get under skin.

In light of the Bruen decision, the plaintiffs in Miller v Bonta (CA magazine ban) have filed for the stay to be lifted as the circuit judge (Saint Roger T. Benitez) used text & history to rule in the case as was the standard set in Bruen and the state is very unlikely to prevail.

My concern is that with a “good cause” standard it is very likely that a lot of victims of domestic violence and stalking just had their addresses and other personal information doxxed to those that would do them harm. Hopefully this won’t lead to someone being directly harmed.

Correct. This has no bearing on the Standard or Lifetime EHCP.

If you read the document @GlockSpockposted in full, it actually does explain it pretty well. This is only applicable to the Concealed HCP (and they were sloppy as hell as is their norm when they wrote that law). There was no renewal fee attached to the renewal of the Concealed HCP. This fee and change in renewal term from 8 down to 5 years covers the costs associated with the required background checks for the permit renewals. While TN did adopt a version of permitless carry, this is a separate program and they have no relation to each other in practice or administration.

Generally because non-NATO stamped ammo like this is not destined for NATO supply chains. While it may be loaded to NATO spec, and is often labeled as “surplus” it is actually often manufactured for commercial sale.

Guys, if we could let’s steer back to the legislation a hand.

I know I’ve carried $20+ million of pharmaceuticals in my trailers multiple times.