Chucktshoes

I disagree. The reason why this legislation has any meaning at all is that it has teeth. Just like they did with their version of a Firearms Freedom Act. Ours was a meaningless piece of drivel with no backing behind it. Our AG basically let it be known that anyone charged by the Feds for operating under the TFFA was on their own. The only way for the states to reassert sovereignty is to make sure that any legislation they pass to that end, has the teeth of state law enforcement behind it. You are right that you don't make unenforceable threats, you back up the legislation you pass by enforcing the penalties in it. Only then can you force the fed.gov to deal with the issue instead of ignoring it. Lock up a couple s@&$bags from Burn All Toddlers First and then ask the fed.gov, "Whatcha gonna do about it?"

Of course, The Simpsons have been on the air for over 20 years. They have done everything by now.

Good piece.

I have examined my conscience and it is clear. Go examine your own you piece of shit as you stand on the corpses of children to further your attack on the civil liberties of Americans.

They would most likely go to Kentucky. They already have facilities there. Easier to expand than build from scratch.

Bahahahahahahahahaha! Hahahahahahahaha! *gasp* Bahahahaha! :lol:

Awesome.

Excellent and 100% on point.

I don't know.

This.

Neither do I.

You however are in the Daaaanger Zone!

Wait for it... :lol:

All of y'all post whores who post with no intention of adding anything useful are just plain pitiful.

Pretty much.

I think the alacrity with which many here have jumped up to throw Yeager under the bus has much more to do with the messenger than the message.

At least in Mexico and along the southwestern border.

They get mad points for funny. I think the funniest line was the one about "working to reduce the deficit." I nearly split something internally.

I'm out of them too. Looking forward to when you have some more printed up.

I'm sorry, I just have a big problem with yanking a permit over speech. Kwik at least had a track record of irresponsible and provocative action under his belt. Yeager only made nonspecific threats that do not rise to the level of being prosecutable. This is a bad, bad thing. Where does TNDOS draw the line and how do any of us know where that line is?

These are the things that worry me. How long before they start combing the interwebs for the things we have said here or on Facebook and then start revoking our permits for what we have said? As much as I think it couldn't have happened to a nicer guy when they snagged Kwik's to what has happened with Yeager, it is becoming disturbingly easy to snatch an HCP.

That was my favorite part.

Agree. Shapiro managed to get in there and stick to his points and wouldn't follow Morgan's attempts to direct the debate into the weeds. Facts are a bitch when you don't have any of your own.

One of them being a high quality set of tweezers. Really comes in handy with the sear spring.

I have installed a couple. What's the problem?