Chucktshoes

That was only applicable to government issued phones. Does not apply to personal phones.

Nope. They don’t have to. They move through nearly every single square inch of them in the pockets of the service members who work there. They constantly listen and record the activity on and around them the entire time as well.

I don’t really know anything about them other than when they come out the date is over. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Yeah, the truth about that stuff comes out so fast it’s pointless to even waste time lying about it. Haven’t you ever heard of the War Thunder Forums?

There’s some wiggle room as the ceilings are set for pilot safety and airframe longevity, but yes, I do. Can they exceed them, yes. Is it safe to do so? It gets real sketchy real fast. (This is based off of my understanding of the F-16s that I worked on when I was in the AF.)

I’m currently doing a complete watch of Magnum P.I. (the real one). As to the question of anything semi-current, not that I can tell.

Yeah, this smells like a whole bunch of cope.

I’m not sure why a balloon is such a big deal when you’re all carrying Chinese spy devices in your pockets.

Canada is nearly a wholly owned subsidiary of the CCCP.

Best part is that it doesn’t matter. Because none of this makes any sense at all.

Not unless he opens his mouth. But he’d have to serialize it if he wanted to register it.

I expect the Lautenburg Amendment to fall for the same reasonings. Like most gun laws in this country. I won’t pretend that this doesn’t elevate risk to some folks who find themselves in these situations. It would be ridiculous to do so. That said, it’s also not like those restraining orders actually did anything to stop folks who sought to do harm. They’re just pieces of paper after all.

Cleaned up the mess. Let’s keep it clean and if anyone has questions, shoot seller a PM.

Any trade interests?

I’m of the opinion that it really depends on a few factors like how long the thread has been dormant and does the prior conversation on the topic bear directly (like providing context) to the new related post.

The safety protocols used in the industry that were developed with the assistance of the NRA remove the actor from the chain of responsibility for ensuring any real firearm used as a prop is safe to handle. While they were an improvement over prior protocols and practices, I don’t see how they actually hold any legal weight with regard to culpability for anyone’s actions. The NRA isn’t a government body that has the ability to absolve anyone of responsibility or grant legal immunity as long as someone follows the rules they set forth. Regardless of the outcomes here, I suspect the industry is going to have to develop new protocols that involves more training of the actors who may handle real firearms as props, and more directly involves them in the chain of responsibility for safe usage and handling.

Normal command structure. LTs and Majors in the CoC.

An FFL on the other hand must comply immediately.

Class B misdemeanor. https://law.justia.com/codes/tennessee/2010/title-55/chapter-10/part-2/55-10-205/

Brace alone poses no issue at all.

Separate trials and change of venue was built into my statement. Doesn’t change the fact that the jury will see that video.

I’m not so sure that the idea of each officer being judged individually is really that realistic. In the trial of all of them the video will be a primary piece of evidence and I just don’t see anybody separating one person’s punch or kick from everyone else’s. They were all willingly active participants in this grossly egregious case of brutality and I suspect that any juror will see them as all jointly culpable.