Chucktshoes

I'd say that is a pretty broad brush you are painting with. Not all gay folks are driven by pushing an agenda just like not all blacks are saggy pantsed thugs and not all gun owners are inbred rednecks. There are actually some gay folks out there who don't have an agenda, they just want to be left alone to live their lives. Hell, I guarantee there are some gay folks that agree with you that this case was stupid and the couple should have just gone somewhere else and that the baker had the right to choose not to participate.

Meh, I once flipped an 89 escort 4 times side over side coming to a stop upside down on a flat portion of hwy 88 in Maury City. I was doing about 45 mph.It is just as easy to lose control of a vehicle doing the speed limit as it is while speeding. All it takes is just the right amount of driver error. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I agree that if challenged it would be unlikely to withstand a court challenge but an important factor to take into account is that the city does not retain direct control over the Beale St. Entertainment area. Those several blocks, all buildings and the street itself are leased to and administered by a private management company. The city doesn't have direct control over what happens on the street anymore than it has direct control over what happens in the hallways of an office building.

How'd ya guess? :lol:

That blows.

Apparently there are enough of them that it is somewhat of a meme in the Doctrine Man cartoons.   I think it is just another piece of evidence that this quisling bastard is a tool that nobody in their right mind should pay attention to. The only thing I want to ask him is "How many citizens are you willing to see murdered by the government to achieve your goals? Hundreds of thousands? Millions? How many?"

How are you liking it TMF? Just discovered these and am thinking about one.

http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/bateman-on-guns-120313 IT'S TIME TO TALK ABOUT GUNS AND THE SUPREME COURT By Lt. Col. Robert Bateman on December 3, 20135821 42 0 3 In his opinion on District of Columbia v. Heller, Justice Antonin Scalia spent nearly 4,000 words denying that the Second Amendment included the words, "A Well Regulated Militia, Being Necessary To The Security Of A Free State..." We crossed the line some time ago, it has just taken me a while to get around to the topic. Sadly, that topic is now so brutally evident that I feel shame. Shame that I have not spoken out about before now -- shame for my country, shame that we have come to this point. One story tripped me. A woman charged with killing a fellow Alabama fan after the end of last weekend's Iron Bowl football game was angry that the victim and others didn't seem upset over the Crimson Tide's loss to arch-rival Auburn, said the sister of the slain woman. People, it is time to talk about guns. My entire adult life has been dedicated to the deliberate management of violence. There are no two ways around that fact. My job, at the end of the day, is about killing. I orchestrate violence. I am not proud of that fact. Indeed, I am often torn-up by the realization that not only is this my job, but that I am really good at my job. But my profession is about directed violence on behalf of the nation. What is happening inside our country is random and disgusting, and living here in England I am at a complete loss as to how to explain this at all. In 2011 the number of gun deaths in the United States was 10.3 per 100,000 citizens. In 2010 that statistic in the UK was 0.25. And do not even try to tell me that the British are not as inclined to violence or that their culture is so different from ours that this difference makes sense. I can say nothing when my British officers ask me about these things, because it is the law. And for that, frankly speaking, I am embarrassed by our Supreme Court. The people who sit on a nation's Supreme Court as supposed to be the wisest among us. They are supposed to be the men and women who understand and speak plainly about the most difficult topics confronting our nation. Our Supreme Court, however, has been failing us, as their actions have been almost the exact opposite of this ideal. You do not have to read this full Supreme Court ruling, it is a supplemental. I can spell it out for you in ten seconds. Five of the nine members of the Supreme Court agreed that the part in the Second Amendment which talks about "A Well Regulated Militia, Being Necessary To The Security Of A Free State..." did not matter. In other words, they flunked basic high school history. The lengths to which Justice Scalia had to go in his attempt to rewrite American history and the English language are as stunning as they are egregious. In essence, what he said about the words written by the Founding Fathers was, "Yeah, they didn't really mean what they said." You have got to be fking kidding me. Seriously? You spent nearly 4,000 words to deny the historical reality of thirteen words? That, sir, is an embarrassingly damning indictment not just of you, but of an educational system that failed to teach history. But just so we are all clear on this, let me spell it out for the rest of you. During the American Civil War, a topic about which I know a little bit, we had a system of state militias. They formed the basis of the army that saved the United States. For most of the first year, and well into the second, many of the units raised by the states were created entirely or in part from militia units that predated the war. But even when partially "regulated," militias are sloppy things. They do not always work well outside their own home states, and in our own history and in our Revolutionary War, it was not uncommon for militia units to refuse to go out of their own state. In the Spanish-American war the way around this limitation was for "interested volunteers" to resign, en masse, from their militia units and then sign up -- again en masse -- as a "volunteer" unit. It was a cumbersome solution to a 123-year-old problem. Which is why, in 1903 Congress passed the Militia Act. Friends, if you have not read it I'll just tell you: As of 1903, the "militia" has been known as the National Guard. They are "well regulated," and when called to do so as they have been these past twelve years, they can fight like demons. I am proud of them. And I am ashamed that Justice Scalia thinks that they do not exist. Guns are tools. I use these tools in my job. But like all tools one must be trained and educated in their use. Weapons are there for the "well regulated militia." Their use, therefore, must be in defense of the nation. Shooting and killing somebody because they were not "upset enough" over the loss of a college football team should not be possible in our great nation. Which is why I am adding the following "Gun Plank" to the Bateman-Pierce platform. Here are some suggestions: 1. The only guns permitted will be the following: a. Smoothbore or Rifled muzzle-loading blackpowder muskets. No 7-11 in history has ever been held up with one of these. b. Double-barrel breech-loading shotguns. Hunting with these is valid. c. Bolt-action rifles with a magazine capacity no greater than five rounds. Like I said, hunting is valid. But if you cannot bring down a defenseless deer in under five rounds, then you have no fking reason to be holding a killing tool in the first place. 2. We will pry your gun from your cold, dead, fingers. That is because I am willing to wait until you die, hopefully of natural causes. Guns, except for the three approved categories, cannot be inherited. When you die your weapons must be turned into the local police department, which will then destroy them. (Weapons of historical significance will be de-milled, but may be preserved.) 3. Police departments are no longer allowed to sell or auction weapons used in crimes after the cases have been closed. (That will piss off some cops, since they really need this money. But you know what they need more? Less violence and death. By continuing the process of weapon recirculation, they are only making their jobs -- or the jobs of some other cops -- harder.) 4. We will submit a new tax on ammunition. In the first two years it will be 400 percent of the current retail cost of that type of ammunition. (Exemptions for the ammo used by the approved weapons.) Thereafter it will increase by 20 percent per year. 5. We will initiate a nationwide "buy-back" program, effective immediately, with the payouts coming from the DoD budget. This buy-back program will start purchasing weapons at 200 percent of their face value the first year, 150 percent the second year, 100 percent the third year. Thereafter there will be a 10 year pause, at which point the guns can be sold to the government at 10 percent of their value for the next 50 years. 6. The major gun manufactures of the United States, less those who create weapons for the federal government and the armed forces, will be bought out by the United States of America, for our own damned good. These opinions are those of the author and do not reflect the United States government, the United States Department of Defense, the United States Army, or any other official body. As for the NRA, they can sit on it. (Sorry, I grew up with Happy Days. "Sit on it" means something to those of my generation.) R_Bateman_LTC@hotmail.com. Read more: Bateman On Guns - It's Time We Talk About Guns - Esquire Follow us: @Esquiremag on Twitter | Esquire on Facebook Visit us at Esquire.com

I'm a bit fuzzy on how they can do this as well but my understanding is that it has to do with the special status of Beale as an entertainment district. The entire street is considered an outdoor bar with sales and consumption allowed openly on the street and alcohol is served past 3am. I don't know of anywhere else in the state where you can engage in public purchase and consumption of alcohol @ 4:30 in the morning.     I think it is all BS, but that is how they justify that if I remember correctly.

That's wonderful news.

I've shared this on FB, praying that she comes home safe, sound and soon.

That's my text tone. My ring tone is a Dalek. "EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!"

The Weeping Angels are the creepiest of all the villains the Doctor has faced in my opinion.   I have Doctor Who ink. On my right arm I have the Tardis framed by a Dalek, a Cyberman and a Weeping Angel on 3 sides.

The Constitution already is a worthless piece of paper. If the Constitution actually held any power, we would not have the government that we do. Once again I shall quote Lysander Spooner,   “But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.”

When the government abandons the rule of law, the citizenry can be expected follow suit. The rule of law doesn't protect the citizenry from the government, it protects the government from the citizenry.

Personally I think this was a genius move on the part of Daniel Defense. They had to know that this commercial would never get approved. Look at the production values of the commercial, you don't spend 10 million to put that on the air. Now they get to sit back and enjoy all the free advertising as the spot goes viral.

As soon as this goes live I'm going to order 50 dildos and play "Ride of the Valkyries" on a loudspeaker.

Nobody ever should. :lol:

Somebody forgot the first rule of carrying in a non permissive environment. Concealed means concealed. Without evidence to the contrary, I am going to assume the student was just carrying for self defense without any other ill intent. One gun and two spare mags is less than my daily load out of 2 guns and three spare mags (2 for the primary, 1 for the secondary). If he had a bag full of 10 or 20 mags, that might be a little suspicious but not 2.

I'll look for the link later but the GAO just released a report recommending that the TSA be dismantled and security returned to private contractors.

Exactly! It has no solution. That's the point being made. So we should dispense with the security theater of unreasonable searches and sexual assaults so folks can accept that there are risks in life that can't be eliminated and go back to enjoying flying.

On weekend nights they bring out the wands and use them at the entry and exit points to Beale.

[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bETCusT5kNM[/media]

I think you underestimate the allure of the third selector position for the target demographic of this item. See Macgyver's post for further explanation of the target demographic.

Here is an example of how this sort of situation would play out with me. I believe that if there is not an identifiable victim, there is not a crime. Any prostitution, nonviolent drug, or other consensual act offense I would vote not guilty. I'm not telling the lawyers involved because if I did, I wouldn't be able to stop the state from committing the immoral act of putting someone in a cage for a consensual act.