Chucktshoes

I'm thinking real hard about a shield, it is definitely on the want list. As far as the manual safety, I'm just gonna yank it out altogether as I view it as an extraneous item and an extra point of possible failure. My carry guns don't have manual safeties.

If I have access to the facility and there isn't somebody wanding me down, I can tell you at least one person who will be armed.;)

[quote name="Erik88" post="1078501" timestamp="1386970991"]It does exist. One of my coworkers brags about using it frequently.[/quote]

Clarksville appears to be a fair amount cheaper than Memphis. That being said, prices have definitely gone down.

[quote name="6.8 AR" post="1078445" timestamp="1386964626"][s]Google[/s] The NSA knows where you've been. :D[/quote] FTFY.

[quote name="Joseg" post="1078446" timestamp="1386964737"]I SPY, Camel Toe[/quote] http://youtu.be/lvyt0PwMX_g

That's not all I am a fountain of, giggity!

[quote name="RobertNashville" post="1078357" timestamp="1386953361"]Do they even have those here in TN??? ;)[/quote] I don't know, but I think there is a website called backpage where you can find that sort of thing as well as anything else other folks have for sale broken down by city. A lot like Craigslist, but they kept their red light section. Or so I am told...

[quote name="LINKS2K" post="1078326" timestamp="1386950618"]My point is that most TGO members don't live in Memphis, but probably have several more weapons than any Memphian here for sport and security that they really don't need since they safely reside outside of Memphis. Obviously, things aren't so rosey in the rest of the state either. I never notice Memphians doing much bitching about the crime because it seems that most are smart enough to know that there will be higher concentrations of crime in urban areas. It comes with the territory. Also, it appears that most Memphis members have enough sense not to patronize whores, buy drugs and steal from people, so we hear about crime the same way that you do from news organiztions that love to keep you paralyzed and bunkered down in your home afraid to turn the channel and miss the next threat.[/quote] As a PSA: If you are gonna patronize whores, leave the street walkers alone. The outcall escort services are worth the extra $$. Not that I'd know or anything.

[quote name="LINKS2K" post="1078341" timestamp="1386951519"]1. I'm going to remember this thread the next time that one of Obamas juveniles does something stupid to see if we can get the same level of compassion for the young person. After all, we wouldn't want to destroy the life of a minor would we? 2. I recently had a lady get pissed at me because I told her that the little sh*t who killed that contractor in Memphis needed a life sentence or the death penalty for his crime. He killed a kids father on the kids birthday. He should fry! 3. I always attempt to place myself on both sides of the story. If this drunken asshole were my son, sure I would want to protect him. On the other hand, if this jack wad had killed one of my loved ones I would want the bast@rd to fry several times over. He committed a major crime and destroyed many lives in the process.[/quote] I'll show the same level of compassion. ;)

[quote name="TripleDigitRide" post="1078220" timestamp="1386919442"]My cousin is a machine programmer for the company that's owned by this child's father. He said that there are already at least 5 or 6 multi-million dollar lawsuits in the works. They are suing the child, the parents, and the father's company. Apparently the child was driving a company truck at the time of the accident.[/quote] Here is where the number of victims goes up. How many folks are going to lose their jobs as the father is forces to sell off and liquidate parts or all of his company?

For child pornography!   http://www.wmctv.com/story/24193886/tn-senators-chief-of-staff-investigated-for-child-porn?utm_source=buffer&utm_campaign=Buffer&utm_content=bufferd753c&utm_medium=facebook     (WMC-TV) - Tennessee Senator Lamar Alexander's chief of staff is being investigated for child pornography. A search is underway at the home of Ryan Loskarn, who is the chief of staff at Sen. Alexanders' Washington, D.C. office. Senator Alexander released the following statement regarding the investigation: "I was just informed by the United States Senate legal counsel's office that law enforcement agents are conducting a search of the personal residence of Ryan Loskarn, the chief of staff of my Washington, D.C., office regarding allegations involving child pornography. I am stunned, surprised and disappointed by what I have learned. Based on this information, I immediately placed Mr. Loskarn on administrative leave without pay. The office is fully cooperating with the investigation." According to Roll Call, the "source for news on Capitol Hill", Loskarn also used to work as the communications director for Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), among other House representatives.

I posted this in the other thread, but I I think it belongs in this one as well. :lol: Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

There are several articles over at Daily Kos of folks wetting their knickers over the thought of those meddling conservatives at an Article V convention foiling their schemes. This is the most recent one. It is worth supporting if only to keep the wailing and gnashing of teeth up over there.     http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/12/04/1260066/-Alert-Art-V-Convention-Threat-Grows-Dec-7-2013-Assembly

This is par for the course for those fuckwits. They get no benefit of the doubt from me. However, as bad as they are, I don't want them going anywhere. Until the bad laws the ATF enforces are gone, I will take their incompetence over a competent and much more ruthless FBI any day. So I say be thankful for the incompetence of the ATF and pray it sticks around until those laws are gone.

:lol: Alright you two. Knock it off. Back to topic, as someone who has faced real discrimination based on sexual orientation by being discharged under DADT (long story)I wouldn't call what took place there real discrimination. A private entity chose not to provide his services to a couple of folks based on personal convictions, boohoo. Unless this baker engaged in actions that caused identifiable harm to the couple like accepting the order and then reneging at the last moment, or calling all the other bakers in town and having them blackballed because they were a couple of 'mos then leave the poor man alone. To the couple in question I would ask why they feel the need to have the approval of everyone to the point of taking folks to court so that they can get some one to officially say they are just as good as everyone else. It speaks to deep seated insecurities in my opinion. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

You're just jealous it wasn't yours. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

I'm gonna jump in here and say as someone who has taken a dick and can also take a joke, I thought post #147 was funny. Even when I used to date men I thought leather daddies were funny. Now that I am married to a woman, I still do.

Ha! I can tell you are still kinda new around here. At least every couple of months we have a thread about the gays that goes long and strong and just when you think it has petered out it rises again for another round of flogging.

The deer poaching comment was a lighthearted attempt to translate the concept using a metaphor I thought would be relatable to you. I think any game warden would call boy driving just as guilty of poaching as the boy who did the shooting. Right? If one has a religious objection to homosexuality/gay marriage then to facilitate that would make one guilty as well. Here is different example. I have a friend of mine that works at another location of the same pharmacy chain I do. He is devoutly Catholic and the Church's teaching is that the use birth control is a sin. He does not handle BC pills and especially avoids the morning after pills because to facilitate someone else using them and committing a sin, he would be guilty of the sin of "scandal". (This is how it was explained to me by my friend, if any Catholics on the board are able to offer correction to something I have wrong, please do so. ) As far as the baker being part of what's wrong with the country I would counter that some folks inability to let others live life as they choose without demanding that everyone act and think like they do is a far more problematic issue. Really, how hard is it to go, "Oh, you don't want to bake us a cake, photograph our ceremony or rent us your facility*? Ok. We will take our money elsewhere." *All items that private individuals and in the last example, a church were sued over for declining to provide service to a gay wedding.

If you support or facilitate someone else engaging in an action that you view to be wrong or sinful, do you not bear culpability for your level of participation? It is the same concept as being an accessory to a crime. "Well warden, I didn't poach that deer, my buddy did. I just drove the truck."

This. This. A thousand times this. I don't support the baker's refusal of service. What I do support is his right to make that refusal.

To paraphrase and old saying, "You are what you carry". Considering the number of times I have been called a tool, I guess that means mine are all tools. It could be worse, I could be carrying a queen... :leaving:

Yep. For Ft. Campbell the border doesn't exist. At the gunship I work at we have sold handguns to soldiers stationed at Ft. Campbell. If we can sell a handgun to them, you can buy one from them. Those orders qualify for residency.