Chucktshoes

I recall reading about the addition at one point in an article that had the basic gist of your last post in that it was a question that the law doesn't address and that the ATF was basically making law by asking it. I very well may be mistaken, but I don't think so and am trying to track it down. I can't seem to find any scanned versions of the 4473 that predate the internet era. I believe the time frame for the addition of 11a was sometime during the Reagan administration.

I'm trying to track down what year it was that it was added, but question 11a was not always on the form. It was a later addition by the ATF. 

I recently left walgreens after seven years with them as an assistant manager. I too was subject to and understood their no firearms policy. I carried every single day. I understood that were I to ever need to use my gun that I would be looking for a new job. I was ok with that as hopefully, I would still be alive to look for one. For those of you saying you won't go back to shop at Walgreens anymore, good. Not because of this, but because it is a terrible, terrible dishonest and unethical company that treats its people worse than any group of evil bastards I have ever had the displeasure of working for. There are plenty of reasons not to shop there. They are a terrible company run by terrible people. If one day they made the national news because somebody snapped and went full in postal at corporate headquarters I would understand and wonder what took so long.

Haha, well it is the Doodie Project after all. It isn't for everyone, that's for sure. 

http://doodieproject.invisionzone.com/index.php?%2Ftopic%2F1758-huge-uspsa-cheating-scandal%2Fpage-6 Halfway down the page, post 112 lays out the details.   It appears that Paul Hendrix is involved in some activities that can possibly have a serious impact on all of the individually timed shooting sports. This might just be a really big deal.

I wish him success in his future endeavors.

The course of the day's events may necessitate that I shoot somebody. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[quote name="Dustbuster" post="1159335" timestamp="1402861614"]Do yourself a favor though keep it out of plain sight to avoid being drawn down on during a traffic stop or accident. I just hope Voldemort or the like don start riding around looking to test this :-/ Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 of course it ate my spelling.[/quote] Oh, he will. Of that I have no doubt whatsoever. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Is there any way to do something about that?  :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:   (I have much lower impulse control than you do broox.)        

Point of correction. The French were instrumental in providing support to the colonists in their fight. The likelyhood of success without that help would have been very slim. Much of the help was provided through unofficial back channels as overt help from the French Monarchy would have cause full out war with England. Still, the French used the 1st American War of Independence as a proxy war against England much the same way we armed and assisted the Mujihadeen in Afghanistan against the Russians.

Hey, multiple threads are just more opportunities to argue about the same subject.  :rant:  :rant:  :rant:  :rofl:

[quote name="Oh Shoot" post="1158267" timestamp="1402619505"]Maybe you saw exit for Barack Obama [i]Avenue[/i] in East St. Louis? There's also a BHO [i]Boulevard[/i] in St. Louis somewhere too. There is a BHO [i]Parkway[/i] in Orlando, though. All presidents get lots of stuff named for them. Bet none of them beat Martin Luther King in total number though. - OS[/quote] If you ever find yourself on MLK, don't pull over and stop because you are in the wrong part of town. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[URL]http://c4ss.org/content/28140?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+c4ss+%28Center+for+a+Stateless+Society%29[/URL] Here is another article with a slightly different perspective than the one I posted before. Still from anarchist position but offering a different a view.

It sounds like a gas issue to me. As in no gas. If it is not even attempting to eject, it is getting little to no gas. I have a sneaking suspicion that gas block to port misalignment is the issue. Is it the set screw gas block? The gas block may have shifted and if it is hidden under the handguards, you may not have noticed.

[quote name="TMF" post="1157712" timestamp="1402521522"]AAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!! Blasphemy!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk[/quote] I like my whisky Irish or Scotch in origin. That Tennessee and Kentucky shit, y'all can keep it. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

They're both garbage, so who cares?

No street date just yet. Details were leaked early. I would expect it to start hitting stores in the near future.

My understanding is that it isn't that the thumb safety was a source of any problems, they are just responding to the customer's desires for a model without a thumb safety. I've been planning on buying one but just haven't gotten around to it yet. I was just going to remove the thumb safety and put a plug in the hole, but this will now save me the trouble.

There is suspicion that the gun was ditched by a shoplifter. http://www.carolinalive.com/m/news/story?id=1054479

[quote name="tnguy" post="1156902" timestamp="1402329783"]He's way off base. This was an initiation of violence by these scumbags and indefensible. This was no revolution, just a couple of lowlifes looking for an excuse to kill some people.[/quote] I didn't and don't endorse everything Cantwell wrote in this piece. I only offer it up as a view worth considering. There are portions of the article that are valid. Others, not so much. Take what is of value, leave the rest. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[quote name="DaveTN" post="1156820" timestamp="1402309894"]you are allowed to post garbage like this but we are not allowed to respond in the fashion it deserves or we will be banned.[/quote] Like any other view, even ones that I may hold personally repugnant, the response it deserves is always to attack the idea itself in a calm and reasoned manner. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[quote name="Pain103" post="1156808" timestamp="1402294610"]Are you ####ing kidding me? You post that crap mocking a person getting murdered. Justifying a murder based on their occupation as a LEO. You hate people because of their job that is legal and that probably 99% are honest hard working officers. You and the rest of the revolution / cop haters can go in some dark corner and live your miserable lives.[/quote] My life isn't miserable, it's actually pretty good. You should consider who you are talking to when throwing out words like "legal". To someone like me legal/illegal doesn't matter much when discussing morality of initiating violence against otherwise peaceful people. The initiation of aggression against peaceful people is immoral. The vast majority of the LEO's job is the initiation of aggression against innocent people. When you arrest a nonviolent person for any crime without specific victim, you commit an immoral act of violence. Regardless of whatever badge, uniform, title or whatever position someone holds, it does not grant them license to commit violence towards the innocent. If that innocent party chooses to use violence to defend themselves from said immoral act of aggression, so be it. It is no different than someone defending themselves against any other random person on the street intent on doing violence towards them. To be clear, I don't hate cops. I even have several officers in local LE that I consider friends. What I do hate is what they are expected to do in their job. If all they did was go after those who commit violence against others instead of initiating violence, I wouldn't have any issue with the job at all. I still would view it as being funded through violence, cause taxation is theft, but hey, nothing's perfect. Right? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

[quote name="Oh Shoot" post="1156792" timestamp="1402287224"]Wow. So, does that fit into your anarchist-libertarian viewpoint? - OS[/quote] Cantwell is a little more aggressive than I am with regards to local level LE. However I completely agree that their paychecks are derived from ill gotten gains. Taxation=theft. I do agree with the larger point that prematurely throwing yourself on the pile of corpses is a waste. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

A perspective to consider. [URL]http://www.christophercantwell.com/2014/06/08/dead-men-dont-start-revolutions/[/URL] Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

There have been quite a few folks in the adult film industry who have been having their banking institutions sever ties with them due to OCP. While some of the merchant categories are legitimately shady, it really does appear that undue influence is being placed on businesses in industries that, while perfectly legal, the government finds objectionable in one manner or another.