gregintenn

Con: They spend way too much money soliciting further donations from you. Pro: They are the most able ally the gun owner has in Washington.

Yeah....that's the general reponse I get when asking about tatoos. I guess I'm just too dumb to understand.

I'd enjoy one.

I've never understood the appeal of tatoos. The few folks I've asked about them have largely went away offended. I'd be interested in a good explanation.

Could I ask "why?" without starting a big argument?

Now I got three.

Good job, dad! An ill fitting rifle is as aggravating for a child as it is for us.

I've had 164 visitors, and only two friends. Kinda reflects real life for me.

Still at 96 %. Somehow I don't think that'll get reported on MSNBC.

One just sold on Gunbroker for $1005.

No kidding? Cool!!!!

Did you teach in law school the difference between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Government?

Isn't it a Federal law as well? If not, why do we have the I.N.S.?

Sounds like you've had quite a time. It is a shame, but there are more than enough folks in gun shops who seem to derive a thrill from trying to impress, or intimidate others with their supposed knowledge of firearms. I've found this type of person usually uses this tactic to try and cover the fact that they actually know very little. I, for one, never return to these type of shops. There are many fine and knowledgeable people here who can answer most questions you might have. I'd suggest you find someone on here, or at least a range that rents guns, to let you shoot a variety of guns before deciding on exactly what you want. I've bought and sold hundreds of guns, and my wife says I still don't know what I want. It sounds like you had a good experience with Bill's Outpost. I'd encourage you to return the favor and give him your business when you decide what you want.

That is exactly the point I have been trying to get across.

I wondered about that when it was first passed.

Yes sir, I do believe that is what it is....tyranny.

You're missing my point. No one here is argueing that BP is not at fault. What I'm saying is that it is not Obama's job to mke them pay. It is up to the court system.

Folks, I don't care where in the political spectrum you fall, you'd have to agree that this bunch has got to go!!!!

I slept a little, cussed a little, cried a little, wnet back to sleep, and worked on a holster for a fellow forum member.

How much longer until a state seceeds or revolts?

First Read - All signs point to Obama adm. suit against AZ law ...for passing a law making it illegal to be here illegally. Really?REALLY!!!!!???????!!!!!!!!!???????

For those of you who aren't sure what actions the Federal Government should take to deal with this crisis, I beg you to read our constitution! It is very clear what the Government should and should not do. It doesn't matter what you think, or how much money BP made last year, or what color pantsuit Hillary Clinton is wearing. It matters what the constitution says. If you don't like it, set about getting it changed.

It makes him guilty of TWO crimes. That would be more than simply murder, because murder is ONE crime. I'm not quite sure what you are asking.

I've never knowingly voted for anyone who was anti second ammendment. As others have stated, if a politician is the enemy of the second ammendment, he likely considers the entire constitution toilet paper.