gregintenn

I carry either a Smith and Wesson revolver or a Ruger LCP. For the life of me, I can't locate the safety on either.

For a nominal fee, Roy Jinks will write you a letter on Smith and Wesson letterhead, giving all the information available for your revolver; including shipping date, where it was shipped, and in what original configuration it was shipped. These letters are very good investments in the Smith collecting world.

S&W Forum Here's your best source for Smith and Wesson information. If these guys don't know it, it ain't known.

Have you ever actually talked to Mae Beavers? She ain't easy to like.

Like my ole pappy says, "A blind hog will find an acorn every now and then.":D

Pretty close.

quote from History of Smith and Wesson by Roy Jinks: "On April 24, 1942, Smith & Wesson's serial numbers on the original .38 M&P series reached 1,000,000, and a new series was started having a V prefix beginning at serial number V1. This series was nicknamed the Victory model to signify the company's hope for a quick victory in World War II." This lead me to believe your's was made in late 41 or probably early 42, and is not a Victory model. 1967 1971 1974 1970-1973. If you own more than a couple of Smith and Wessons, and have more than a passing interest in them, it would be money well spent to purchase the book: History of Smith and Wesson by Roy G. Jinks. Mr. Jinks is the historian at Smith and Wesson, and the foremost authority on the subject.

You must not have been here to witness the a$$hole the Republicn party foisted onto us the eight years prior to Bredesen. Compared to Sundquist, I LOVE Bredesen!!!!

42-6 Bama.

I don't have a preference either way. I find both sites pretty user friendly compared to other forums. I do hope I'm only seeing part of the new test program, however, because a lot of the features here aren't there; or at least i can't find them. All the sections aren't there, and neither is the PM part of the program.

I kind of set him up.

Sums it up pretty well.

I haven't read the ammendment. Is there any possible trick, snare, or downside to it? Is it simply a campaign gimmick someon thought up? What is it exactly?

You all have illustrated my point. Decent people don't want to hold public office!

I am. Have any of you ever considered a run for office? I don't have the temperment or people skills to pull it off, but I'm sure some of you would. You'd have backing here.

I watched part of one of their debates last night. No way I could stomach all of it. As bad as I hate to, I will vote fot Haslam. McWherter began every thought with the preface of how he wante to follow the lead of Illinois on this, that, and the other. If I wanted Illinois, I'd move north. Illinois gave us Obama!

When I get home tonight, I know I’m not going to be able to breathe if I take them off. It could be psychological, I don’t know, but I just put em on and wear them anyway." Read more: Jimmy McMillan's Debate Gloves Explained Is this common with a history of Agent Orange exposure?

A very powerful ad indeed.

I haven't heard that.

If Davis actually believes these allegations, he's not very bright agitating and publicly humiliating a mentally unstable guy with access to a gun.

Here's the answer!

....that, and he has fuzzy testicles on his chin. All joking aside, what's up with the gloves?

You're gonna probably want a stock on a 12 guage shotgun.

Yeah. you are correct. I'll add her to my list.

Oh, I understand. I'm not saying they made the best desicion. I do think that was a no win situation. They do plenty to pi$$ me off. Sadly however, they're all we've got.