turkeydad

No she ain't. Oh yeah there's no teeth behind their words yet. And any bill would have to pass the Senate and then get signed by Sleepy Joe before it became law. Perhaps they could do something to inhibit funding.

Well at least there are members of the House at least talking about this. And the little gal from Colorado at about 10 minutes in is smoking hot.

I read it and they mentioned if it had to have a buffer tube to function then it could have one but they went on to say that just because it has to have one doesn't mean it couldn't be determined to be an SBR. You know the standard double talk that would allow them levity to do whatever they want to do.

I just watched this about an hour ago and thought of you when I did. I was actually going to post it and mention you. That's crazy...and this guy was on point. It does suck. But being truthful and thoroughly considering the subject matter rationally is the way to deal with it.

Thanks I just ordered some.

I pray thee…speak of this doing of you fingerprints yourself. Is there a kit you can buy or something?

I’m kinda looking at it right now. Heck I almost lost my mind doing my kids FAFSA. All jokes aside, and yes this whole thing sucks. But, the kid in me was chiming in that a couple of free tax stamps without a waiting period don’t sound too bad in own my personal situation. I would just love the heck out of a traditional folding stock on my AKV. And it sure wouldn’t take much to improve the Sba3 brace on my AR. My Shockwave is another issue for me. I went ahead and put the birds head on for now. I suppose if I did do the amnesty registration on the 2 “pistols” and they went ok I might do the Shockwave later.

And what makes it worse is that you are right. I knew when I printed them that they are not binding. And I agree with you.. I don’t think think that 88 day bull crap is an intended planned trap. But you know as well as I do that there’s a lot of people who didn’t do anything wrong catch hell trying to play ball with these a$$ clowns. And I’m just trying to figure out do I want to be put in the game.

They guy from GOA said that the 88 days is not from the date of filing. But he did say the 88 day thing is rare but does happen. But he knows that’s it’s obvious that if hundreds of thousands of Americans or more accept the ATFs amnesty offer that their will be backlogs and as he pointed out after asking about it that depending their whim it might be bad for someone who was trying to play ball with these clowns. It might be fear mongering to run around worrying about getting bit by a bear. But it’s not fear mongering if you are sticking your hand in a bears mouth.

It may not go “ my way” but I’m not just going to eat it and say I like it. Those letters being addressed to SB Tactical have no more value to SB Tactical now as they do to me. So I really don’t get the point with with that. I never thought the bump stock ban would be successfully challenged yet here we are.

Well of course the letters are not addressed to me. But what would be the difference if they were? Let’s take a guess and go with there would be no difference. Whether the letters were addressed to me or SB Tactical they stated the ATFs position was that adding a brace did not make the gun subject to the NFA and that shouldering the weapon did not change that. Now after the fact that millions of law abiding Americans invested in these now they change their minds. I’m sure that’s just fine to you but myself…not so much.

In the FAQ section questions 16 and 17 state that the ATF does not regulate a brace itself.

You don't have to get rid of it. They stated the brace itself is unregulated.

This one has a few sponsors... https://good.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-good-introduces-protecting-individual-sovereignty-through-our-laws-0

Gaetz is swinging for the fences... https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gaetz-introduces-abolish-atf-act-ruling-against-stabilizing-braces.amp

That's what I gathered too. As they so elequently stated since the forward grip on the pump clearly indicates it was never intended to be fired with one hand. So illegal when it hits the registry although they will wait 60 days before enforcement (by their own grace) which of course is worth nothing. As I have the letter saying the brace is ATF approved and a copy of the letter stating shouldering a brace is not a violation as well.

One thing I'm trying to figure out. The rule change says there is no waived fee or amnesty for braced shotguns like Shockwaves or Tac 14s. Does that mean they are a short Barrell shotgun right off the jump.? And if did pay to file would you have to wait for approval?

The registry is public so you can see by looking it up. But I'm sure there will be plenty of people letting everyone know when it's published. Or you can just see if braced pistols are still listed for sale.

So apparently when it hits the registry brace equiped pistols will be off the menu. https://palmettostatearmory.com/pistol-brace-rule.html

And no waived fee on the braced shotguns...

I guess the best bet to determine if it's technically in place is to follow the money. It appears to me Palmetto State and others are still selling brace equiped pistols...so there's that.

I'm hoping House Republicans see this over reach and cut their funding till they come to heel.

That’s what I’ll do with both of mine if it sticks..but I think it’ll get shot down pretty quick.

I honestly do not think it will stick but they gonna try anyhow.

They have made it official. https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/factoring-criteria-firearms-attached-stabilizing-braces