mcurrier

William Shatner on gun control - YouTube - William Shatner on Gun Control - It's How Well You Aim the Gun

I don't think so. He's in a hot, toasty place. Mary Jo is in a much, much nicer place. btw, the liquor manufacturers are putting up most of the money for his memorial.

...and it will legitimize Obama. He will then be eligible to be President since he would then be a legal citizen.

Then perhaps we need to get them to...what's the word...'reconciliation'... Then they can just "deem" the House version to have already passed and we're good to go. That's how they do it in the big leagues...isn't it?

Roger that! Meathead can bite it though. Liberal sack o'

Larger caliber is better.

yup. that's it.

That's what I'm thinking, probably 15 rounds. And I'm guessing on price, probably initially in the $625-$649 range based on current pricing of the new 3.8's at about $575.

May 2010 issue American Rifleman, page 9. 4.5" bbl I can't find any info on their website or in web searches. Ad shows website as following, but no info there yet. Springfield Armory - Introducing the XD(m) Polymer Handgun

We're already there. The necessity of a quick reversal before it all permanently locks in is the issue at hand. First step - Nov. 2010. Second step - Nov. 2012. If we falter on the first one we are royally screwed for many generations.

Poor Rayburn ought to just love that!

N-e-w-s-p-e-o-p-l-e? What's that? There used to be some people that would report the news. You know, things that had happened. They would tell you what had actually happened. Now we have people that just make the news up. It's very rare these days to get an actual objective report of what really happened.

Question it?! Challenge it?! They're carrying the water for it.

The Sniper Babes! Same old lame show. Went only because I needed something (so add $7 to the price I paid). Murfreesboro show next week will be much better and about 4 times bigger.

liberals

At first I thought that you meant veterinarian. I was like, wtf?

I do agree. The American Revolution and 18th century history is the area of my passion and expertise. It truly made this country a country, and what it was able to become leading up to today. Unfortunately, that is now being twisted, perverted and reversed by those temporarily in power. We need to be as vocal as our forefathers were and prevent the deterioration of these United States of America. I predict a major backlash of ultra-conservatism after the departure of the current regime. Blessing and prosperity the likes which we have never seen. We can thank little Jimmy Carter II for making so many of us thirst for it. The Civil War has only recently piqued my interest (5-6 years ago). Modern day politics has a lot to do with that interest as we are starting to repeat history. Off-topic, I have a civil war battle website of reenactment photos. Going to reenactments has boosted my interest greatly. Battle Pics by Mark Currier - Civil War and Revolutionary War Reenactment Photos

That's the way that so-called reporters see everyone. Like Wolf Blitzer during Hurricane Katrina. "...so many of these people, almost all of them that we see, are so poor and they are so black..." CNN's Wolf Blitzer on Katrina's Victims: "They Are So Black." | NewsBusters.org Liberals hand you a fish. Conservatives hand you a fishing rod. Liberals want to take what you have and give it to someone else. Conservatives say, "yeah, I got mine, let me show you how you can get it too." Liberals want everyone poor. Conservatives want everyone richer.

I was up in Gallatin a few weeks ago and they had one of those portable electronic road signs parked down a random street advertising the coming of the census and how important it was to participate. Give me a break. And I've seen tv commercials as well. What a WASTE of taxpayer $ for all of this crap.

Exactly. I voted against the $250-million stadium which i knew would cost $500-million, and it did. We didn't even get a chance to vote on this $1-billion rip-off and I can guarantee you that they will be bending us over (even further) for it. Oh...and Goldman Sachs is involved. That says enough right there.

1985 VA.

Stewart is a sack-O

+1

"Honest ociffer, a dog ran off with my pants."

As a disinterested third-party to the CW, never having been overly interested in it from a political standpoint, then add in being from upstate NY, I have to render my (professional) unbiased opinion (being a History major in college) - I find that Confederate history is NOT about race, or entirely about slavery either. After much research and then having moved to the south with a few pre-conceived opinions (which have since changed), I have learned that Confederate history is primarily about honor and preservation of family, home and a way of life (not referring to slavery) that was threatened by a force from a completely different culture. The CW was more about the South's attempt to secede from the Union. Even blacks, both slave and free, fought on the side of the Confederacy, as well as free blacks fighting on the side of the Union. Once war began, many 'reasons' could be added to the list, slavery one of many, but slavery wasn't the primary and sole reason. I can see and understand both sides from the perspective of both the Union and the Confederacy. I agree and disagree with many things from both sides. The CW was a terribly stupid and destructive war, and unfortunately we are today repeating many things that lead us into it.