mcurrier

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2168161/Detroit-hit-flesh-brain-eating-zombie-apocalypse-live-action-terror-theme-park-pushed-through.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

GOP governors stand ground against ObamaCare despite ruling Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/03/gop-governors-stand-ground-against-obamacare-despite-ruling/#ixzz1zZc94UoQ

“I am for doing good to the poor, but...I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. I observed...that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.†― Benjamin Franklin

A very informative article: http://www.redstate.com/6755mm/2012/07/02/an-interview-with-media-malpractice-filmmaker-john-ziegler-about-media-bias-in-the-2012-election-campaign/

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katehicks/2012/07/02/nice_try_obama_released_restrictive_new_energy_plan_under_cover_of_scotus_holder_contempt http://cowboybyte.com/9581/nice-try-obama-released-restrictive-new-energy-plan-under-cover-of-scotus-holder-contempt/ "File this one under While You Were Out: the Obama Administration unveiled its new five-year energy plan on Thursday, when the rest of us were conveniently preoccupied with SCOTUS and the Holder contempt vote. Real smooth."

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/hero-general-obama-following-castros-plan/ "...explained in the video a six-step plan used by revolutionaries to bring about Marxism elsewhere and drew parallels to Obama’s actions in the U.S." Boykin laid out a step-by-step plan he says is the model of how Fidel Castro instituted Marxism in Cuba, Mao Zedong in China, Stalin in Russia and Hugo Chavez in Venzeula: Nationalize major sectors of the economy Redistribute wealth Discredit opposition Censors opposing viewpoints Control gun ownership Develop a constabulary force to control civilian population

Here are a few pro Roberts is a genius articles from this morning - http://visiontoamerica.org/10704/did-roberts-make-a-conservative-trojan-horse/ http://www.ijreview.com/2012/06/9398-why-chief-justice-roberts-made-the-right-long-term-decision-with-obamacare/ I will wait until this garbage is quickly repealed in its entirety before I go proclaiming him a genius. I hope he is, but I'm not seeing it just yet.

NICE!

Now in suppository form!

If Obama gets re-elected...

http://www.wnd.com/2012/07/feds-label-liberty-lovers-terrorists-again/m

Romney has problem calling it a "tax" DON'T WUSS OUT ON US ROMNEY, LIKE McCAIN DID! http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/02/romney-others-still-honing-message-on-obamacare-tax-or-penalty/

So...if I come next time...do I need to bring my own woman, or will one be provided for me?

Nope. But I do believe everything that I read on the internet. And I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night.

Yup. And Rush said today that obamacare should be called obamaTax.

More often than not (that would also read "most of the time"), conservatives are able to back up their position with facts, while liberals are not. Liberals typically use emotion, yelling, and arguing the same point over and over to wear their opponent out with theory rather than referring to empirical data as conservatives do.

I disagree. They once thought that the earth was flat as well. I believe that what we call 'oil' is abiotic and replenishable and is manufactured deep below the surface of the earth near the core. Laugh now, but I'll put my bet on that and we'll see who's right in the end.

There is a well known saying by conservatives about present day politics - If liberals win elections, they expect conservatives to 'compromise', meaning, "sit down and shut up!" If conservatives win elections, liberals expect them to compromise, meaning, "give us at least 50% say in what goes on". Liberals want their cake, your cake and my cake and eat it too. I can't compromise with that. And I don't disagree with you as much as you may think I do. I am for America, and for Americans. And I am for anyone else who is for the same.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/02/us-usa-navy-greenfleet-idUSBRE86106X20120702

New book at Amazon - http://www.amazon.com/dp/1470165228

This. And the answer is no. Hell no! One side is correct, the other is wrong. I will not say "why should the correct side compromise with the incorrect side?", I will say that the correct side CAN'T compromise with the incorrect side. That's not how you hold on to positions of high values and ethics. Once you let in a little bad stuff, the rest of it is soon to follow. Then you wish you could get rid of it, but you can't. Then you wish that you never compromised, but it's too late. Then all you have left is memories of the good 'ol days before things went down the tubes. People don't like confrontation. They don't like tough decisions. They don't like rolling up their sleeves and taking out the trash now, they'd rather wait until later. Unfortunately 'later' is too late. Evil, wrong, incorrect, bad...they must all be confronted now. You can't wait, can't compromise, can't fix it later.