TGO David

What's sad is that most 70's sci-fi / super hero shows had the costumed people running around in some pretty tight clothes. It's pretty obvious how fat America has gotten since the 70's.

I totally freaking remember that show!!!

It's close.

That's an awesome idea.

I plan on being there in the afternoon. I have to be in Spring Hill around noon anyway. Need to finish tweaking the sights on the rifle.

Good for you. Where are you going to shoot?

I agree that both use propaganda. However, I do not believe that both parties are leading us toward socialism. Only one party seems hell bent on doing that at the moment. Just think about it: Redistribution of wealth??? That is socialism. As I said in another thread, that idea is okay with people who think that they will benefit from the hard work or good fortune of others. It's okay with them (for some reason???) to take what doesn't belong to them because they somehow feel entitled. They somehow feel that it is only fair. It's NOT fair. It's a corrupt, despicable, lazy form of existence. Hunger is a base survival mechanism! If you're hungry, you work for your food. If you don't work for your food, you die. The only exception to this should be children, the incapacitated and the elderly. They should be provided for... but that's not what the Liberal-Socialist ideal is about. Their goal is to have you so dependent upon THEM that they have ultimate job security. Haven't you heard the saying that a government big enough to do everything for you is big enough to do anything TO you???

The more I read, the more I type... the more I feel like that guy.

Well, go with your gut then. And allow me to thank you for helping Obama get into office where he can f--k the rest of us for the next four years. When he gets done with your gun rights, an inquiry from the ATF about whether you were selling too many without an FFL will be the least of your concerns.

These issues have been addressed ad nauseum. Do a search. None of them are what you're painting them to be.

Dan Quayle was a tit. Palin seems to be the real deal to me, and my wife agrees ... probably more strongly than I do. Your assertion that more women agree with your viewpoint is going to be a hard one to back up.

Man Humor... the best part about being a guy.

I have upgraded us to the latest version of the vbDynamics "Database" software that we use to provide the list of HCP banned locations, gun stores and gun ranges. It is quite improved over the previous version and there are some new features that I anticipate implementing soon. I must apologize for neglecting this resource over the past year. I had sort of "fallen out of love" with it and needed to get motivated and work on it some more. I will be giving it due attention from this point forward. Thanks.

Sorry... all I got from that was that you're trying to get a feel. Elaborate?

You really get around. Does Eddie know about this?

Hey... you're a runner. I bet I could bounce a quarter off yours.

I assume you're talking about the probability of there being riots and such? Or are you talking about a total collapse of the Americanized lifestyle? If it's the former, yeah I'm as prepared as I feel appropriate. If it's the latter, no, I don't have everything that I would want stockpiled, stockpiled. I'm not sure I really feel that we are in serious jeopardy of that happening just yet. Or is it something else entirely?

The quintessential hot-zone party wagon and Zombie Uprising Bugout Vehicle. http://www.actionmobil.at/page4/page40/page40.html

Very cool. And very cool that he's got someone (you) supporting him on this decision.

It looks good.

I prefer to be the spooner. There's nothing like the feel of taut buttocks pressed against your loins. Neero needs to do some squats, though. (cellulite city)

Do you know her personally or something? Because it's kind of hard for me to come to that conclusion based on what I and most Americans have seen of her so far. In fact, the only thing I can do is the same thing that I can do with Obama. I can look at history. I can look at the history of what she's accomplished in Alaska, and the conclusion that I come to is that she's pretty effective at making some sorely needed changes and putting a stop to some of the "good ole boy" nonsense that Alaska's state government was rife with. Obama's record is a little less stellar than that. So, tell me more about her being a ditz. It sounds like you know her personally or something.

#1... Being okay with taxing those who make more than you is simple human envy at it's most basic level. It's only okay with you because it doesn't affect you. Or at least it doesn't affect you on your income taxes. But here's where it will affect you. Your employer may make more than $250,000 per year. If he is taxed at a higher rate, then his take-home earnings decreases. If his take home earnings decrease, then he will start looking for other ways to cut back expenses. Since this is a free-market economy and since Tennessee is a "shall work" State, he can make those cuts wherever he sees fit. Your job may be the one that takes the axe. The companies from which you buy goods and services will be taxed at a higher rate than they are now. This means that the cost of those goods and services will go up to offset the losses. You will see the associated cost of food, clothing, medicines, vehicles, entertainment items, guns... well, pretty much damn near everything go up as well. You end up paying for the tax increase on the "wealthy" every time you stand in front of the cash register at the store. Some companies will be pushed out of business because of the increased taxes paid to the Obama government. When these companies fold, you will no longer be able to buy goods or services from them. You may have even been employed by them. You and all of your former co-workers are now jobless. I support the idea of a FAIR TAX. Tax people on their purchases. Those who consume more, pay more. Those who save more, pay less. It puts the burden on the people who live lavish lifestyles at the expense of not preparing for their future financial security. Tax cuts would be given to those who donate to charities and other philanthropic causes. This would give the "wealthy" a chance to invest back into society willfully rather than have their money taken from them by government extortion. Your idea that someone who makes +$250,000 a year should be penalized for that will only serve to kill the American entreprenurial spirit. You are supporting a paradigm by which those who strive to do better, produce more, advance themselves through education and in return be paid higher wages will be punished for their success. It will create a whole new generation of people who don't want to work and who expect... no, demand that the government pay them to breathe. Congratulations! Well thought through! #2... Cutting Military spending at a time in our nation's history when our citizens are at a heightened risk of attack on domestic soil by terrorist regimes is utterly ridiculous. Why would you support that??? #3... The Patriot Act needs some overhauling, but it's not the sinister bit of legislation that everyone makes it out to be. I agree that those who forfeit freedom for security deserve neither. However I think that if you scrap the entire plan, you are seriously throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Thoughts???

Just checking back in this morning and can tell you that Neero prefers to be spooned. That is all.