Trekbike

Ha. That's very similar to a conversation that my wife and I have had regarding female logic. They might say something like, "the house is hot". To a female that means, " I would like for you to go to the thermostat and turn it down". To a male she is stating a fact. So now when my wife says something similar in nature I will ask her if she is stating a fact or making a request. My response seems to be working since she is more likely now to just state her request rather than make an ambiguous statement.

[quote name='Reservoir Dog' timestamp='1354464817' post='853785'] Honestly, I fail to see how anyone with an ounce of intelligence can believe this stuff. [/quote] I'm not specifically speaking of the article that started this thread, but I'm smart enough to know that I don't trust our government and am not naive enough to think that events that have happened to other countries can't happen in the US.

TDR, Thanks for sponsoring the giveaway and I definitely appreciate the gift membership! Thanks again.

Make sure to check out the Shield. It's a great value, handles and shoots very nicely IMO.

Past from the past. On July 2, 2008, Barack Obama announced: “We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” Comments on his quote above. Obama’s [b][b][i]Civilian National Security Force[/i][/b][/b]:[list] [*]What sort of people would be in this paramilitary force? [*]What sort of weapons would they have? [*]Who would command them? [*]Would they be subordinate to the U.S. military? [*]Would they be subordinate to the police? [*]What would be the purpose of this paramilitary force? [*]What would it do? [/list] And, what are Obama’s “national security objectives?” Michelle Obama lifts back the curtain hiding Barack’s plans for a [i][i]new order[/i][/i]: “Barack Obama will [u]require[/u] you to work. He is going to [u]demand[/u] that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation. That you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. [u]Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual[/u], uninvolved, uninformed.”

I will attend either one but my preference is Sunday.

[quote name='gregintenn' timestamp='1354298341' post='852900'] I'm not real bright, but isn't that their job? [/quote] I was thinking the same thing. If it's an active site, why wouldn't they stake out the place?

[quote name='Dolomite_supafly' timestamp='1354294420' post='852870'] you cannot choose what you dream about. Also, there is no way for the ATF to verify whether your dreams are in red Dolomite [/quote] Dolomite, thanks for putting in the effort to get this law clarified. Not to jack the thread but all the talk of dreams made me remember the movie "Inception". Good movie IMO.

I agree that out of the box the LCR has a better trigger. The wife and I have 642's with Apex Tactical J Frame carry trigger kits and Crimson Trace LG-405 grips. Both make it a handy carry piece IMO. The Apex kit brings the pull down from about 12 lbs down to 9 lbs.

Sausage Dip [u]Ingredients[/u] 1 lb of [u]hot[/u] sausage (TN Pride is my favorite) 2oz of chopped pimento 8oz sour cream ¼ cup of mayo ¼ cup of shredded parmesan cheese 5 green scallons Box of table serving crackers to be used at the time of serving [u]Directions[/u][list] [*]Brown the sausage and drain/blot grease from the sausage [*]Cut/Chop the green onions, (hold one onion out to use later as a topping) [*]Preheat oven to 350° F [*]Mix all the ingredients thoroughly in a oven safe bowl that can be covered [*]Cover and put in oven. Stir occasionally. Heat until slightly bubbling [*]Remove when hot enough and do a final stir [*]Sprinkle the one chopped green onion on top for added decoration [*]Serve with crackers as a dip [/list]

.380, 12 gauge, 7.62x39

Love it!!

[quote name='peejman' timestamp='1354123759' post='851981'] I'd put up "no parking" signs, [/quote] I'd do this but also add a sign to the effect "violators will be towed" so they know full well what the price is for playing stupid games. Regarding your earlier notes, did you already mention they will be towed if they continued? If so, they've already been duly warned so disregard my comment above.

[quote name='Luke Edwards' timestamp='1354112396' post='851856'] I'm looking to setup for .223/5.56 1st because i have more cases for it [/quote] What other items have you already purchased besides the press? Reloading for rifle involves a little more work and detail than straight wall pistol cases but is still very manageable for someone just starting out.

[quote name='TN Outlaw' timestamp='1352513553' post='842852']i may just save up and get an LC9[/quote] Before getting a LC9, take a look at the Shield. Slightly more money but worth it IMO.

Yep I agree as well. I buy steel cased 7.62x39 and reload .223.

[quote name='frankmako' timestamp='1353553418' post='849330'] i go with five. [/quote] Pick again, Piercedan already called 5. We've got to maintain some semblance of order here or there will be chaos.

Glockmeister is the owner IIRC.

Does a collet puller leave marks on the bullet?

[quote name='cch2a' timestamp='1353154096' post='847100']Yes it retains the Hungarian 12.5" barrel and receiver. Just have to remove the tapco barrel extension and brake.[/quote] I'm still learning all the class 3 rules so I'm curious. Right now in order to be legal the extension and brake have to get you to 16" and be "non removable" correct? So I'm guessing you will have to cut those parts off if you do the sbr? If so, do they just currently have a tack weld making them "permanent"?

I second the Saiga route. Much better value IMO.

Too funny. I needed a good laugh after the day I've had.

Impressive. That kinda ruined their day I'm guessing.

[quote name='zort' timestamp='1352555914' post='843027']how old would she be in 2016. [/quote] I believe she would be 69 by then.

Looks like Hillary, Geithner, Panetta, and Plouffe are leaving before the ship goes under. Ad Petraeus to the mix, and it's starting to get interesting. [url="http://news.msn.com/us/expected-obama-administration-departures"]http://news.msn.com/us/expected-obama-administration-departures[/url]