E4 No More

Yes, I agree. I think it's one of the Founding Fathers' mistakes when they gave the SC power to rule whether something violates the Constitution or not, and not assign them the responsibility to make suggestions on how to correctly go about whatever they were trying to accomplish unless it all violates it to the core. To put it colloquially, don't let them through the baby out with the bathwater. You mention your questioning on how to pay for something in this post, but throw shade at Republicans for not wanting to fund it. I call bull on that. Republicans see so much waste in government spending that they want that fixed before spending on anything else. There is enough waste that if they cut it they could fund so much more without raising taxes. That's a pretty simple concept that makes me wonder why people on the left can't understand it.

How'd this turn into a bash Daniel thread? If you don't like what a member says it's pretty easy to "Ignore" them. When the politics sub-forum was in existence I blocked several of our more impolite members, (both liberal and conservative), placing them on the "Ignore" list until after the election was over. I've written this before but I will remind everyone: We use only 7% of our communication skills when we write. That makes it very easy to misinterpret what someone writes. If you are personally offended by what someone writes then you should either direct message them, and give them a chance to clarify their meaning, or just put them on your "Ignore" list. It makes this forum much more enjoyable.

No good deed goes unpunished, Chuckshoes.

So you are in the "We gotta do something!" group but have no idea as to what. That sounds like a typical leftest. I believe that this entire mess started with the LIBERAL Supreme Court saying that you can't involuntary commit someone. Now they are on the streets killing people by any means they can find. Let's start there: What would YOU do to address this problem.

And if they refuse to make an arrest on that warrant the LEO himself/herself are charged, arrested, and stands before the judge.

They are the actors for Rat Patrol. The series is running on cable. I stopped watching as I'm more realistic today then when I was a kid.

The Justice Department doesn't prosecute contempt of court charges; the judge does.

What he said^.

I guess you've forgotten the crap said during the 2016 election cycle, Russian collusion, Ukraine call, and most of all,. the recording of Trump telling his people to protest PEACEFULLY.

Any judge can hold someone in contempt of court for just about any reason. It violates the 1st, (IMHO), and they do not need the justice department to enforce it. If the FBI refused they could also be held in contempt. I don't think anyone wants to test that with the SC.

Don't type while drunk.

If I were to meet Keith on the streets I'd kick him square in the nuts...if he has any. He really doesn't want to challenge the SC's authority.

I think they are victims of their "It won't happen here" mindset. Reality will bite you in the ass if you aren't prepared for it.

As a former LEO I have mixed feelings about this. While I understand the importance of proper back-up and equipment, I don't think that I could stand by while children were being shot. I probably would have done something "stupid" but at least I would try to save children's lives.

I fixed it for you.

She's a Bobby in Britain.

Welcome.

I own 2 P320's in .357 Sig and have never had an "accidental" discharge.

.224 Valkyrie

First, I don't care what your opinion is of my factual answer. The abortion euphemistically referred to as ObamaCare was supposed to settle that, right? You can blame your formerly liberal Supreme Court for putting the kibosh on compulsory commitment and the closure of asylums.

Give it some time. After all, they aren't that smart.

Insurance would cover what I would need...should I need it.

And this school supposedly had top notch security...in their minds

Seriously? Where have you been?

Because government is NOT the answer. We have this problem because of government and a breakdown in society.