Steelharp

LCR. Light, no hammer, great trigger... no question.

I feel your pain, bro... everything I've applied for, they just laugh at me... "Man, with everything YOU'VE done, we could never keep you happy. Great to meet you, though! Good luck!"

Seems TGO's loading is really being hampered by loading from tacticalrepublic.com. At least, that's what my browser says it's waiting on when I'm trying to look at a page/thread.

Dang!!! Man cave deluxe!!!

Two shots and a splash.

This is what I learned from one instructor. Whichever hand is your main one; just use it, and point at something, with no gun. See what YOUR natural point is. Then, while you're pointing, stick a gun in that hand. THAT will be the most natural position for YOU. For me, it just so happened that my right hand natural point was actually tilted a bit to the left, so it was natural for me. (FWIW, the Marine SRT units shoot what we think of as "thug style;" full 90 degree tilt. My son is currently in SRT school.)

Several news references have referred to it in that manner. Maybe, by Pakistan standards, it is...

THIS is a "luxury compound?" Osama Bin Laden Dead: Inside the Pakistan Kill Site Video - ABC News

I am the same way. I slightly tilt my handgun toward the left; very easy.

I want one! Volkswagen's $600 car gets 258 mpg - National Trendy Living | Examiner.com

You mean, there's something other than the G30SF? No way! Best ever, really.

Nope.

Just because someone is a public servant, it doesn't remove the humanity. They can still make mistakes. I'll tell you, some of the rudest drivers I see are the ones with fireman tags. They tailgate, cut in front of you; and not in dept. cars. Personal vehicles. There's just no excuse for that.

Tiger doesn't need to be distracted at the light.

http://www.tngunowners.com/forums/firearms-classifieds/56496-wts-rock-river-arms-ar-pistol.html

Doesn't take a rocket scientist to look at the image and see the differences in the typefaces on the document. Not that it's ever going to matter anyway, but it's not hard to see. Time to really move on from this.

Speaking for me, no. BUT, I'm not into bullseye. I want a handgun loose enough to be reliable without question if I need it to defend myself. That's the number one requirement for me. That's why I personally can't justify those costs.

It is the internet. You must not only care, it must be your constant obsession and concern that your thread's direction is not subverted or compromised in any way, shape, or form. Or not.

I owned one Wilson in my life, a polymer model, I believe it may have been a KZ-45? Anyway, worst jam-o-matic POS I ever had. I was so glad when I got rid of it. I'll never walk that path again, thank you.

You have done well, and wisely, oh great one.

When they're right, they're right. But that quality inconsistency is what keeps me away.

Serious. A story now owns a story.

FWIW, Rabbi tells me Kwik bought the firearm in question.

Wow, Randy; that's some great info. Sure sheds a much better light on the case. Stupid is as stupid does...

- Gun Owners Club! - A Place for Gun Enthusiasts