Smith

Where did you find a Saiga 12? What was the price, if i may ask? Was it under $500?

I have a Saiga that's been converted to an AK-103 and I love it. The concern I have with the CZ is parts. From what i understand this is a relatively new import and parts aren't widely available like the AK, nor are they interchangeable.

And here comes the union speech. Interesting how it is very similar to Che Guevara's. Which coincidentally is one of the biggest problems with South American industry and economy to this day.

Yeah it's 22 weeks. I'm a little out of context here and chasing a rabbit, but this is kinda the reverse of a discussion in another thread that I referenced earlier. BTW, I agree with you. I start in June.

Clarification, responding to the lawmakers reference.

BC 25 yrds 50 yrds. 100 yrds. MPBR .357 SIG (125g at 1350) .145 +1.7" +2.9" +0.4" 122 10mm Auto (155g at 1300) .137 +1.8" +2.9" 0.0" 119 10mm Auto (180g at 1150) .164 +2.0" +3.0" -1.1" 110

+1 Dave.

That's because they really don't believe anyone, other than LE, should own or carry a gun! That's probably why there tends to be a backlash against LE on these issues. LE are the privileged child, while HCP holders are treated like the step-kid.

Are they? That's interesting, because as soon as this came up in the thread about LE carry restrictions being lifted, the cry was there wasn't any difference between LE and "civilians". Seems to be a standard we want to apply only when it works for us.

You know we all get bent out of shape (and rightly so) when a HCP holder acts like a moron and makes us all look bad, and we defend the fact that most HCP are not the same. Why does that not apply to Police? Sure some are stupid, arrogant, bullies, whatever, but that is the minority. It seems that we have accepted the premise that police are inherently corrupt and these few and far between exapmles are simply evidence of what we already know. I reject that premise and believe that these rare examples are just that, rare (statistically speaking) anomalies.

And if Africa wasn't so polluted with aids, famine, genocide, and everything else they got, billions of our dollars would stay here to fix all our other issues. We aren't Mexico, or Africa, or any other nation. We can't and shouldn't fix other nations that we can't. I'm no isolationist, but Mexico is the way it is for a reason and I don't think our money is going to fix them.

What gets overlooked is that HGH and many other "performance enhancers" weren't banned by MLB when these guys and others took them. Add to that that many of these same "drugs" aren't even illegal. It is a blatant example of the do nothing, look busy, find a process crime, congressional incompetency. The stuff they took wasn't illegal, MLB didn't ban it, so what's the issue? I know, I know, it's all about the kids! Should they have done it? That's their decision, I for one don't like it. Should it be addressed? Absolutely, but not by the government.

Just saw this this AM. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,330888,00.html

Now it's getting religious! Please note heavy sarcasm in all my post in this thread!

Welcome, and as a fellow Madisonian, you will love the Rivergate Academy sports. I can't find a place to beat their ammo prices anywhere, especially 9mm Blazer.

That's not reasonable response!.......................... I am voting for Obama!

Evidently the strain going around now is a mutated version of the common flu. It gets around the antibodies that stop the normal strain. Super Flu!

You are all gun crazy. A responsible person would try to talk to the attacker until they were friends or as a last resort shoot him in the arm or leg. That would allow appropriate time for the only "truly" qualified gun handlers, the police, to respond.

That was a great example of taking a stance on an issue without taking one. He's for it, but against it. It's a right, but government can control it as much as they want. He's not going to take them, just let the states and laws take them. On and on and on it went. He' been learning from the Clinton's.

How about this http://lundestudio.com/2008SHOTShow/ . The pictures alone are incredible. He does some really nice stuff.

Here's some similar in price as well as a single stack. I've used them for ammo and they were fine, but I can't say as to guns. http://www.centerfiresystems.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWCATS&Category=207

It was a group called the Council on Foreign Relations. Bush, Fox, and Martin did lead in the Merida Initiative, however.

They have proven to be inferior to some of the new stuff. They were state of the art 20 years ago, just haven't been able to keep up with technology. The main knock on them is in denim test. They tend to clog and never expand. If you shot a naked human they work great!

I appreciate the response. More in line with what I've seen in the past. BTW - religious belief (at least good belief) needs and should be rooted in the correlation of truth/facts (logic). I agree that those who make decisions about anything, including belief, out of feelings or personal perception are not good judges of that reality. I know this is getting into "religious" talk, just saying we agree more than we differ.

I glad to see you can dismiss any religious argument as inherently "not logical". Believing secularism is not religious is not logical. Thanks for the dad talk anyway. You (Marswolf) hi-jacked a perfectly acceptable thread by making non-sense arguments about the "ethics" of him selling his dog. It's his property to sell if he wishes and buy if he wishes. The market dictates this, not a "ethics" cop named Marswolf. I find this inconsistent with you other views on personal liberty.