Smith

Personally, I would sell the G19 and then pick up the P07. The P07 you can get OTD for 448-470 NIB and you can probably sell the G19 w/ night sites for around $500 or better. Then you can buy more ammo. I've had two G19's and really liked them, but what I like about the P07 better: - hammer fired (restrike capable) - multiple trigger options (DA/SA or SA) - 17 capacity (G19 is 16, not a big deal) - the BIG one - ergo's! The drawbacks ATM in comparison: - new platform (possible teething issues) - lack of holster options - mag cost All theses I think will be negated in the near future.

I'd think the lower with the cutout would add to the price and $1100 seems reasonable for a m4 variety of that sort. If it came with the Larue BUIS. Since prices have started dropping, I've started seeing regular M4 varieties going in the $700-$800 ballpark. I've never seen a lower with the cutouts so maybe Hero Gear or one of the dealers can tell you how much, if any, it adds value.

For one AR's need to be very wet. That being said I ran mine on the dry side (both DT's) and never had a problem. I assume it is a 5.56 not a .223? If you are using 5.56 in a .223 barrel you could have pressure issues.

Funny how we all hate butchering proper English yet will use all sorts of non standard "text" abbreviations in post. thnx, LOL, IIRC, etc. Oh the irony. I bet English teachers are having fits these days!

He was in the military and served as he stated. While I understand folks being upset, rightly so, joining here to slander doesn't make you any more right or him any more wrong. You can find him in Joelton,TN at ASP. I see him there quite often.

You're gonna be blinded by that polished top in a tactical scenario! What a worthless piece. Seriously though, I really like the Equinox SIG's.

Some of that is auto spell checkers.

CZ P07 currently in a Don Hume OWB. I'm waiting for Raven Concealment or Hoffners to get molds. Carries really nice and I like having 17 rnds ready to go.

That is beautiful! Very nice.

Great price on a great pistol. You will be changing your screename shortly!

Man! Everybody's a mod these days! Congrats Jason!

Even if you can carry, I would recommend a very secure holster. A lot of bad things could happen if that thing got slung off at a couple G's traveling 70 MPH! That's not even thinking about it going off.

Man! If Americans realized how the rest of the world lived, this would be a different place. What a different mentality we have here in the states. good stuff.

That's the one!

What's bowtech?

You are correct. I had downloaded all them and I thought it was there. I'll have to look again. I have the Ranger's Handbook, US Medical Handbook, Army Survival, and Marine Corp Survival in PDF if any one wants them. Just PM me or e-mail and I'll get them to you.

I had a notion to not vote for him. I followed through.

Nah, I'm not kidding. Your premise was if the person is not a "threat", meaning apparently running away, then no shot. I was just raising the point that it depends. It also needs to be said that he may be running away to return with reinforcement. Be that people or armed. Personally I assume if they are willing to steal, it is a small step to stealing a life. If I can get a clean shot, I'm taking it, irregardless of the "property" they have. Self defense is not a cost evaluation. That being said, a bullet in the back is going to look bad and I would avoid it. Not because of a lack of threat but because of civil liability.

You can get them here free as well. Biggerhammer.net - Miscellaneous Firearms Technical and Training Manuals

I've been informed that Merriam-Webster is no longer the authority on acceptable word usage and validity. That is why I am starting the official word thread. That way the grammar Nazi's can make sure we are in compliance with proper usage. Of course this is tongue in cheek, but could be interesting! Have fun, but be nice! I'll start. Please validate/invalidate/define these words: - irregardless - boolit - SNAP! - ain't - yo - fofie - milli -fully

Irregardless of your 2 cents, it is defined and accepted by Merriam-Webster which is the accepted word validation in academia. But feel free to argue with the brick wall. What if said thief has a child instead of said property? would you still not fire on him. What if the property were firearms... a dog? What is the dividing line?

I'm healed!

That's four?

What is this?

Yeah, but cutting that shroud off can be a bit touchy. You go to far and now you're going to spend at least another $200 SBR'ing that baby!