Smith

Lots of I interest but still here. Bump

Story is Ron Howard couldn't get the rock to the water, so they had a guy hiding in the bush to the right throw a rock. If you watch you'll see a delay and a projectile from a different angle in the scene.

I was/am always intrigued by the gun rack

My father bought this new in 2002 and has had it till my son bought it this past year as his first car. It has 213000 miles and is still mechanically solid. $5000 Nashville area. The Bad: It's older and has a few dings, specifically in the driver door, rear bumper, and a crack across the windshield. The check engine light is on due to the O2 sensor. Interior is good but is starting to get thin. It's 22years old! The Good: It has new front and rear brakes, new front end including suspension. It was re-painted white (factory color) this summer, new headlights, and new front bumper. Toolbox is in decent shape and everything works. It's a solid work, utility, towing V8 Toyota.

Great inexpensive 9mm's. Functioned checked and ran without issues.

The best is the Quadlock MAG case. Me and both my boys use them with the wireless charger on our motorcycles. Retains wireless charging, has the magnet, and the twist lock. I liked the Rockform but they didn't have a wireless charger.

Haha, Greg I tried but he turned the Suzuki into an MT09 and then that into the R7. However the Suzuki got him going in the best possible way. I personally was hoping to hang on to the Suzuki for awhile. Awesome bike.

That's awesome.... Well, except for the tank ;). My youngest son just picked up his first bike, '24 Honda Rebel 500, and we went to Arkansas and back with my older son ('22 Yamaha R7) about 3 weeks ago.

Great shooting 22LR pistol. KelTec CP33 with two OEM mags. Has a fantastic Galloway Precision SS trigger and Farowtech brace. Red dot not included. $Sold Nashville area.

Out of principle I won't do one or ask for one. I am required by law to "believe" they are a TN resident and legal to own a firearm. Usually when i ask those questions, they offer to show me their ID or similar, but I decline. I don't begrudge the guys that do and I understand their reasoning but I've walked away from some deals because of it. It's not personal and I don't say anything unless it's necessary. It's a personal principled choice and I leave it at that.

I've had several of both and PSA Micro's. Here is my comparison of the PSA and CR920. In regards to the Glock 43x, it's like a very simplified version of the CR920 with lower mag capacity. The CR920 you can have the lower capacity with a shorter grip or higher capacity with the same grip length as the 43x. The fact that you'd have to buy PSA mags and spend more money than the CR920 to get it close to the CR920's refinement and mag capacity, there is no value to be had. Then you have the optic cut. The CR920 is darn near perfect in it's optic mount system. If you get the MOS 43x you've spent too much for a bad mounting system. If you get the 43x and want it optic cut, you could have bought nearly two 43x's by the time your done. The other option is to get the PSA micro slide that is optic cut, and again, why the Glock at that point? The grip, handling, setup, and shoot ability of the CR920 is right out of the box. The Glock needs a lot and even then falls short of "Perfection".

That reminds me of a smooth version of the tgo one way back in the day. I'd take one of those!

At best Loughner was an "independent" . He is credited with being neither right nor left in his political leanings. Try again.

You equated the right to work and medical/health related requirements for employment as opposite sides of the same issue. They are not related in this scenario. The vaccination requirement violated religious liberty protections/rights in addition to being a stipulation unrelated to the job as agreed to in the hiring and continued employment agreement and understanding. Right to work had nothing to do with the case. I'm big on right to work, these are unrelated in this case. Right to work only came up as a horrible attempt to justify a bad faith attempt at an illegal procedure unrelated to the employee/employer agreement. The judgement agreed. It's like when people use Scripture out of context to justify a principal the scriptures have clearly defined for centuries. That was my point.

Right to work in no way means a right to violate constitutional rights. This has long been established in every constitutional concept. There is an assumption of good will on both parties in right to work. In the same way 2A assumes good will and responsibility of intention. 1A ect.