KKing

I don't see how post count correlates with making posts directly intended to stir the pot or provoke anger in this thread (i.e. being a troll) I get your point, but post count has zero to do with the TYPE of posts made, especially in this thread, which is what I was referring to. All it proves to me is he's been a member longer, it doesn't speak to the type of posts being made, although outside of this thread they may be helpful. Dave may be the best guy ever, but sometimes a spade has to be called a spade. You can disagree with me all you like, but I still expect you to recognize facts as such if we are going to engage in conversation. I don't deal well with agenda pushing and posts specifically intended to stir the pot...especially when masked as "opinion". That's like me starting a thread on this forum titled "Guns are evil". It's my opinion and unsupported by any type of logic or fact. I know exactly what type of attention and response I'll receive by making a post like that, and deservedly so. Opinions when theres no facts are just that, opinion. Opinions that ignore the facts in front of you, are silliness and based on nothing more than feelings. Your mileage may vary. Oh well, the facts of the case are in, we all well know that if he's not acquitted it's unjust to say the least. I'll keep my comments aimed directly toward the case, no matter how silly posts are Now I'll go cower in the corner and wait for someone to say I'm racist for using the word "spade". ;)

Why can't you engage in decent discussion? Dave, this is the funniest, although directly hypocritical, post I've read today

Not everyone thinks Zimmerman is an angel... Angel? Who gives one crap about being an angel? Innocent is the term I believe you're looking for, that's all this trial has proven. You know they make medicines you can take right? There has to be some flaw in your mental process, that's the only thing that makes sense. You're at best, a troll. At worse, a very mentally flawed individual

I think he's Trayvon's real father. "If I had a son"..... I'd kick his tail if he acted like Dave

Didn't you "ignore" me on another thread? Apparently, crapatalk doesn't recognize my ignore list, so I still have to see your delirious babble when I'm on my phone.

Yes we can Hope! Change! Transparency!

I hope you're not serious with this shit still. I pray you aren't. Justice for Trayvon has already been served, all that remains to be seen is if George will get justice

367

Actually there are a lot of free float tubes that use the original barrel nut. Gieselle, Noveske, Rainier, some of the Midwest Industry and a few others all use the orginal barrel nut. They clamp onto the original barrel nut after you remove the delta ring and spring assembly. It is actually a pretty ingenius design and if you look at my wife's 9mm AR next time we get together you can see the setup. I would get a clamp on gas block before one that is held in place by setscrews. The one you have pictured is the one to get.On this note, I have to recommend the Troy Ind. handguards. Simple to install (3 bolts to the barrel nut), rigid, and pretty dang spiffy. They are more pricey than some of the generic free floats, but still come in well under your Daniel Defense's, Noveske's, and so on. I'm very pleased with mine

Yep. The prosecutors might as well have had rubber dicks glued to their foreheads all week. I doubt that they want to go thru that again. :) Sometimes I just read these topics for the lol's, this post did not disappoint

a woman on the CNN jury last night, with a straight face said she believed after Zimmerman shot Martin he called one of his buddies to punch him in the face and bounce his head off the concrete. If she believes some crap like this it is a real possibility a actual juror believes it. This is no way a slam dunk for the defense. I honestly have no feel at all for how the trial is going. Sadly, you're absolutely right. But there again, I'm ok if just one believes it

Kinda like what happened today?: "Dr. Valerie Rao, who was called by the prosecution to provide her assessment of Zimmerman's injuries based on photos, cast doubt on Zimmerman's claim his head was repeatedly bashed against the pavement as he fought with Martin in the Feb. 26, 2012 incident. "The injuries are so minor that the word slam implies great force," Rao said in response to questioning by prosecutor John Guy. "There was not great force used here." Rao said Zimmerman's injuries were not only "not life threatening" but were also "very insignificant." She said the injuries to the back of Zimmerman's head were consistent with hitting the ground but the injuries on his face were from consistent with one punch or strike." Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/07/02/detective-returns-to-stand-in-zimmerman-trial/?test=latestnews#ixzz2Xvimhlds I read this and can't help but think...very easy to say for the person that didn't get their head beat on concrete. I'm sorry, but getting my head banged ONCE on the concrete without me being able to escape from someone on top of me and I'll be in reasonable fear of my life. Getting punched is one thing, getting your head bounced off concrete is another

Better yet, it's Bush's fault!

The situation came to Zimmerman? So someone made him stop his vehicle, get out and become involved in a foot pursuit of a person who was apparently not engaged in any illegal activity even after the police dispatcher advised him not to do so? Wow, the force must have been really strong in that Trayvon character for him to make Zimmerman do all that just so he might get a chance to beat Zimmerman's head against the ground. I'll repeat what I said, and highlight a couple of facts for you, since apparently you have either missed them, or are blissfully ignoring them. The EVIDENCE shows the situation came to Zimmerman. The EVIDENCE shows that Martin doubled back, to confront Zimmerman, which is what led to Martin's shooting, regardless of how you feel/what you think. The EVIDENCE shows that in fact Zimmerman was never "advised to not follow Martin", a dispatcher told him they didn't need him to do that, per the 911 call. Which basically means squat. He broke no laws by stopping his truck or keeping an eye on Martin, the only law broken that started the ball rolling was Trayvon jumping Zimmerman. So, please, tell me again about this "force" you speak of. Besides any of this, if Zimmerman broke no laws (which there has been no EVIDENCE to say he has), and presented no threat to make Martin fear for his life, he was justified to end Martin's life with his firearm to protect his own. That's what the EVIDENCE shows.

My guess would be stress. You know, some people stop eating and lose, he may eat when he's stressed. I admit, I feel bad for the guy

I love the fact that even though they're moving the operation they are fighting to the end. I'm ok waiting on them to start production back up of colored pmags, it's worth the wait

Hmm looks like I need to be getting me an 80% lower if we're gonna have a party!

I ordered one of these http://www.krebscustom.com/KalashnikovRifles.shtml I now hate you. My oh my the things I'd do to own that rifle

I just love to hear Internet badasses say "I would have just whooped that beanpole, I wouldn't have used my firearm" or "I just wouldn't have gotten in that situation" It's to those I speak of, I submit this... 1) That's awesome, you fighter you. Chuck Norris would be proud. The fact of the matter is, this guy is on top of you, which would introduce leverage into the situation and it's not in your favor, regardless of weight. He's on top of you, banging your head against the concrete. Now, do you wait and wonder "Will I be able to toss him off of me before the next blow to the head? Or will the lights go out and it be the end of my life?" Or will you use your firearm? You're a fool if you still believe you're badass at that point. You think if you haven't fended him off by now that you'll somehow kick his tail after the next hard blow to the head? You won't, you'd fear for your life, and you'd stop the threat on your life. At least if you valued your own life. It's easy to say "he did this wrong" or "I woulda done this" but the fact is, if you were in the exact same spot, the result would be the same. Or....you could be dead, your choice 2) From what the evidence shows, the situation came to Zimmerman or he got surprised. Now, you may think you're some sort of spec ops ninja samurai and your situational awareness never drops, but you're wrong. Plain and simple. So please, spare us your complete and utter bullcrap. We can train all we want and we can be as aware as we want, but in most self defense situations you're going to be starting behind the curve. You're going to be reacting to someone else's actions.

DOJ can, of course, do whatever they want--and they do--but the FBI already had a handful of SAs down in Sanford to hunt for evidence of racial motive, and they came up empty. Andrew @LawSelfDefense Facebook: Law of Self Defense Obviously the FBI doesn't have anything on some of TGO's finest, because they managed to find plenty of racial motive, without any evidence, from the comfy of their easy chair. I had to read it twice since I have been up all night, but did chuckle when it sank in

Careful. That's a good way to get your cookin' show cancelled :) And the award for quote of the thread goes to... Did LOL, that was great

Very well said, better than I could have. So I'll just say...this for me too

Question for those that have seen it. It's my understanding that the book is a collection of short stories, or different accounts I should say. Is the movie set up this way?

I can't help but wonder if he had the thought process to not shoot that one in fear of what the others on the ground may do. I know dang well what I would have done...reload The thing I found most interesting is the absolute speed that the bear climbed the tree with. I had no idea they could just shuffle up a tree like that

Since you said primarily home defense, I'll echo the Glock 19. I carry mine, but it is on the large side for concealment. Glock 19 + Streamlight TLR-1= win