-
Posts
2,334 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5 -
Feedback
100%
Content Type
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Everything posted by KKing
-
[quote name="RC3" post="1131489" timestamp="1396070186"]Thanks for those links. I will order one the next time I have some extra cash. I have never sighted in a scope before and what would be the best way to do it. I would probably like to sight it at 100 yards.[/quote] Well that sort if depends on what distance you'll be shooting at. If you zero at 50 yards, you'll be about 1.5" high at 100 and back on at around 200 yards. As far as the "best" way to zero a scope...I personally will just set up at 50 yards with two 12" targets side by side on my target stand. Fire 3 shots, adjust accordingly, and repeat. Make sure you're on sandbags or some type of rest to take your movement out of the equation
-
Stripperflage for brass pole barons!
KKing replied to Dustbuster's topic in Firearms Gear and Accessories
Funny to look at, that's as far as it goes -
Big mistake on not inbounding it to a ball handler. Oh well, coulda woulda shoulda
-
[quote name="Lumber_Jack" post="1131364" timestamp="1396054531"]Oh and they are shooting the lights out from the 3[/quote] This. You can't even allow them a half step of clearance
-
We've got it in us, but they're outplaying us on both ends. Maymon with 3 fouls is killing us. We need his strength inside
-
This has been a big year for upsets, I hope that holds true tonight. If we play like I know we can, Michigan will be wondering what went wrong when the game is over
-
I needed this after a bad day at work lol. Glad I wasn't the only one scared to look
-
As an aside, I'll add this. If you're gun functions, on all types of ammo and bullet weights, don't worry about where your spent casings go. If you're having trouble with recoil that's one thing, but if you're only worried about the ejection pattern alone, you're chasing your tail IMO. Worry about where the bullets go, not the casings
-
Man, that's is awesome. I've never seen that pattern before either. Think it's a new one?
-
Alright, alright. I'll admit I saw the thread title before I had my coffee and thought "why are people being killed by digital things and who's advertising it?"
-
Honestly, and not to disagree with what's been posted, but heavier buffers, new springs, and the like....are bandaids. Fix the actual problem, which is likely too much gas. An adjustable gas block is the best way to do it. I'm not saying that a heavier buffer won't change your ejection pattern a smidge, but in the medical field we would say that you're "treating the symptoms, not the disease"
-
My new favorite is cheap cans of dollar store spray paint. Shot at from at least 50 yards, with a centerfire rifle. I haven't found anyone man, woman, or child, that didn't giggle when the can flies around like a rocket after hit
-
Joshua Miller(RI-D) tells reporter...
KKing replied to whitewolf001's topic in 2A Legislation and Politics
He kiss Obama with that mouth? -
PTAC and PSA lower kit and anderson lower.
KKing replied to RC3's topic in Gunsmithing & Troubleshooting
[quote name="RC3" post="1129528" timestamp="1395717557"]thanks for the feed back. What about the trigger group? I heard some of the guys here saying that the PTAC group sucks and the regular PSA is pretty darn good. [/quote] In my experience, the PSA is about as good as you'll get for a stock GI trigger, I don't have experience with the PTAC though -
PTAC and PSA lower kit and anderson lower.
KKing replied to RC3's topic in Gunsmithing & Troubleshooting
I should have added, I actually have an Anderson lower. I see no difference in it and the more expensive forged lowers I have -
Well gents, I hate to be the one posting these, but they pop up on my Facebook feed, and I hope to keep some of you away from this thing. I honestly thought "well maybe it's starting to break in some" toward the middle of this video. If you have the time, watch the whole thing and see I was wrong. Not the best video, but hey http://youtu.be/yicodN7BrgU
-
PTAC and PSA lower kit and anderson lower.
KKing replied to RC3's topic in Gunsmithing & Troubleshooting
I'm just kidding you, but seriously don't waste your money. A smashed foam plug in the rear or a o-ring around the front lug usually does well -
PTAC and PSA lower kit and anderson lower.
KKing replied to RC3's topic in Gunsmithing & Troubleshooting
If you actually "buy" something to fix your problem, I'm going to personally come kick you in the shin. Place a foam ear plug under the rear takedown lug if it bothers you But, right now all you have is something you heard, they could fit together nicely when you actually try them. Probably 95% of all AR's have a small amount of play. It doesn't hurt accuracy, nor anything else for that matter -
[quote name="sigmtnman" post="1129194" timestamp="1395673394"]riiiiiiiiiiight... The .gov is great about respecting the law and boundaries. [/quote] Exactly
-
[quote name="sigmtnman" post="1129187" timestamp="1395671797"]Something I've wondered and never asked.... Does the $200 tax stamp give the BATF permission to come inspect anytime they desire?[/quote] Yes, but supposedly only for that firearm
-
[quote name="gregintenn" post="1129046" timestamp="1395627383"]I have seen an explosion of these things lately. I see no legitimate use for them. I'm not promoting the banning of them or anything like that. I expect this thread will ruffle a few feathers, but I'm hoping someone can enlighten me as to why they are desirable.[/quote] Does your carry weapon have near rifle range with accuracy? Just asking Besides anything you call "legitimate", they're a ton of fun. I have a lot of weapons that have the sole purpose of being fun. If you don't, you ought to live a little
-
Don't send a shotgun to do a rifles job? That's one tough little toy
-
[quote name="dralarms" post="1128306" timestamp="1395493270"]I stand corrected. I was under the impression that all wolf was Russian. My bad. Please don't throw any rotten eggs. :D[/quote] No worries, I've been wrong once before too ;) It's really nice stuff, sealed primers and sealed bullets. I like
-
[quote name="DaveTN" post="1128314" timestamp="1395494821"]Do you have a revolver like a Smith & Wesson L, K, or N frame in 4 or 6� They will give you a good idea of just how good you are. Sights are critical on a target gun; not even needed on a self-defense gun. There are not yet (or at least I have not seen) any good adjustable target sights for Glock or M&P’s. Because these are not target guns. I suspect there will be for the M&P in the near future; we can hope. Hitting a 12†target offhand without the use of a rest is good for any Tupperware gun. However, stories run wild. Bob Munden shot a 6†balloon three times in a row with a S&W Model 60 J-frame at 200 yards. Gives us all something to strive for. [/quote] Afraid the only revolver I have is an LCR. My 19 is my primary carry weapon so I won't go messing with sights on it unless maybe I do some night sights. I was just curious I guess, but I would like to see what I could do with maybe a 6" barrel, single stage trigger. I might try again next time out, it brings another dimension of fun to pistol day, I've never tried anything past 25 yards before that
-
I'll just add this in here since we've already made mention of Hickock and shooting Glocks at distance. Yesterday I had pistol day at our range. Toward the end of the day I decided I was going to try to make some shots at 50 yards with my 19. I was really surprised to be honest, I could hit a 12" target 40% of the time. Nothing to brag about at all, but I was surprised. I think I was maxing out my ability though. Maybe with some target sights I could do a little better, I was using the stock combat sights. It was definitely challenging, and something I'd like to try more often