Correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not too familiar with the court systems, wouldn't the fact he was acquitted of 'aiding the enemy' indicate that the information he obtained didn't put anyone of our soldiers in harms way as it was too old but rather brought to light some of the events that have occurred which the DOD tried burying? Yes he did in fact break the law but it's info like this which broke Water Gate wide open as well. I'm curious as to everyone elses thoughts on this because when this first happened I was all about hanging a traitor but judging from the result tribunal he wasn't a threat to national security. Again, I dunno, I'm not a lawyer, just a man with some curious questions. :2cents: