RED333

God Bless Texas, as the song goes.

Well as there are not but 2 answers, both. Loaded for a few months, unload (shoot) and cycle to another mag.

What are you using for flux?

And the TEST has started, now we see if the Law hold up or gets shot down. if it holds we are in for a BAD time in Washington.

Best line I have seen today, thanks for the laugh.     I have not gone out to a movie in years, spend my money on Direct TV.

That is a broken firearm, you have to send it to me for repair, better yet, I will come and pick it up for you. Send lots of ammo for testing. :wave:   Man that ia sweet looking pistol, VERY NICE!

How ever getting everyone else to go along is a bit diff.   My feelings are the same, but it aint gona happen. I want everthing repealed back to 1800 laws.

I have been there, is a good shop.   Now, Now, enough of them negative vibes. And fixed the spelling, like I can gfo there.

O yea you can, it is called a hammer.

Pick this off another forum (saiga12)   From the Daily Caller;   Police forensic scientist at Newtown hearing: ‘Assault weapons’ ban won’t work   The forensic scientist for the Bridgeport, Conn. Police Department sharply criticized proposed assault weapon and high-capacity magazine bans and pointed out the small number of crimes committed by high-capacity weapons in public hearing testimony last week.   Marshall K. Robinson, who said his area of expertise is “firearm and tool mark identification,” testified at the Gun Violence Prevention Working Group, which was convened at the Connecticut State Capitol in response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting. There he opposed statements from many of the other 1,300 speakers in attendance advocating for banning high-capacity AR-15 and AK-47 firearms.   Robinson pointed out that less than two percent of the firearms he has examined since 1996 that have been linked to violent crime in Bridgeport have been the caliber of AR-15 or AK-47 weapons.   “Since November 1996, I have examined approximately 2,370 firearms. Of that number 36 of them were either .223/5.56 mm or 7.62×39 mm,” Robinson said. “The percentage of those guns was about [1.5 percent].”   “I did further research on homicides and assaults in the years 2006 to 2012 inclusive. Of the 217 such cases, there were 912 bullets and 466 cartridge cases recovered. One assault involved .223 caliber and none involved 7.63×39 mm caliber. The largest number cartridge cases recovered in one case was 37 and that involved two guns. The investigations that involved the recovery of eleven or more cartridge cases was 22. Of the 22 cases, 21 involved 2 or more guns,” Robinson added.   Robinson went on to criticize past gun control measures and argued that new proposals will not work to reduce violent crime in any meaningful way.   “These are real numbers from real cases in a real city police department. This is not something made up or fabricated. High capacity magazines have been ‘banned’ before. It proved nothing and the ban was lifted a few years ago,” he said. “There are many guns in existence, since the 1860s, which hold more than 10 cartridges, the early Winchester lever action rifles, for example, and many tubefeed 22 caliber rifles. There are some modern firearms for which no other magazine exist. What do you propose we do with them?”   “In your infinite wisdom, you outlawed bayonet lugs, flash hiders, and collapsible stocks,” he testified. “In over forty years of being a firearm and tool mark examiner, I have never seen these components inflict any injury whatsoever on any person. In your infinite wisdom, you outlawed fully automatic firearms that have the capability of firing a single shot. Ladies and gentlemen, I really need help with that one.”   “We all agree that the Newtown case is a tragedy. I submit to you that you cannot legislate away insanity, which I think is the root cause of this case,” Robinson said. “Laws must be passed based on research and logical thinking, not on emotions.”   Robinson also works at the state police forensic lab in Meriden, Conn.   Sent it to my Reps and the Pres.

All I will add is to keep up the pressure on all fronts, it is MOST IMPORTANT we do this. There are other fights out there as well, border securty, taxes, drones, as well as or firearms, mags, background (info grathering) checks. Just keep sending the demandes WE WANT. I end every e-mail with "WE THE PEOPLE VOTED YOU INTO OFFICE. WE THE PEOPLE WILL VOTE YOU OUT OF OFFICE. DO AS WE THE PEOPLE WANT!"

No, no card, just e-mails. Sent 3 to day, all firearm, so far.

No, you dont hear marshal law, you hear a mouth piece trying to get his name in the press is all.

E-mail sent to all listed.

They do not mate and make new ones, they recruit new ones. Got it!

I am with 6.8, I have jamed the in sideways with the hand primer and it did not go off. I dont care for the hand primer, I have yet to to work it and not have it pointing at my face. So I just use the press, works well.

Cut it up into square foot sections, make it 5.00 a foot, figure shipping and sell it.

Go with the offerd help, Caster has helped me a LOT, in casting and reloading. Not a thing wrong getting help, shows you are wanting to learn, good for YOU!

Sent this today   Leahy, LaPierre and the Vermont paradox January 30, 2013|Steve Chapman Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy chaired a Judiciary Committee hearing today where he questioned Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association about expanding background checks to cover private sales, which produced an interesting exchange. (The answer is no.) Leahy is in a slightly awkward position for a couple of reasons. The first is that the bill proposed by prominent Democrats includes a ban on "assault weapons" that he declines to endorse. The second is that he's from Vermont. Why does his home state matter? Because it seriously undermines the case for gun control. Advocates believe that permissive laws foster lethal violence and strict ones prevent it. But Vermont, despite its highly liberal reputation, has among the loosest gun laws in the nation. No background checks, no limits on assault weapons or large magazines -- heck, you can carry a pistol openly without a permit. The Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence gives it an "F." But its homicide rate is less than one-third the national rate, and only two states have a lower homicide rate. How come? Probably because laws are not the crucial variable. California gets an A-minus, but its murder rate is slightly above average. Utah gets an F and it is nearly as safe as Vermont. The fact that is hard for many people to grasp is that it doesn't matter much how easy it is to get a gun if the people who get them are law-abiding. The danger comes when criminals get guns. But the people most affected by gun control laws are the people who pose the lowest threat. Pat Leahy probably knows that. So more firearm laws dont work, the more people that legally own a firearm is better. Enforce the laws that are on the book now.

I get the same, e-mail spider.

They are growing left wing voters, the only way to stop it is to get involved in schools at the upper level.

Propane will get to 1800*f, and then some if done right. A propane torch is a tool for burning the flammable gas propane (C3H8). The maximum adiabatic flame temperature a propane torch can achieve with air is 2,268 kelvins (1,995 Â°C/3,623 Â°F). Some propane torches are also used with a tank of pure oxygen to achieve a flame temperature nearing 3,095 kelvins (2,820 Â°C/5,110 Â°F). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propane_torch

Coffie, green tea, as I stoped drinking years ago.

That was a funny movie, The Pres., not so funny.

3 today, firearms, illegal immigrants, and spending.