-
Posts
5,500 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18 -
Feedback
100%
Content Type
Forums
Events
Store
Articles
Everything posted by GlockSpock
-
My bad, but you’re right. Uncle Suga is the one that usually gets the golden rain.
-
Are you by chance a Russian woman?
-
I have no idea if you are joking or passing along valid information, but I just wanted to point out that 4 days is 96 hours.
-
I did not speak out - Because i had not tested positive for Covid-19.
-
What if the cop responding to a call at your house is infected? I’m not sure if we are the goose or gander in that situation but I agree. Right to know!
-
So much for Candian's being polite: https://www.foxnews.com/world/canada-stormtrooper-star-wars-arrest-blaster
-
He lives in Great Britain.
-
Oh...I think maybe you are talking about the Yojimbo 2. Unless the discontinue it, it is still in production so you should be able to find it.
-
I was talking about buying this knife: https://bladeops.com/spyderco-para-military-2-emerson-opener-satin-plainedge-exclusive/ Which one were you talking about? It seems as if that one is still available, but I'm obviously not going to try and complete a second purchase just to find out.
-
I just bought that sprint run. Guess you should too.
-
Please do.
-
I discovered that a few weeks ago. I almost instantly bought it, but when I saw it was Taiwan manufactured instead of U.S.A., I admit it was a bit of a turnoff due to principal. I admit I'll probably still buy one at some point. Love the design and blade profile.
-
I've thought about getting a PM2 just because that's the knife everyone swears by. Have you seen this sprint run? https://bladeops.com/spyderco-para-military-2-emerson-opener-satin-plainedge-exclusive/
-
I'd say so! Spyderco makes a fixed version...but sadly it doesn't have as nice blade steel and that's the only reason I haven't bought it. I like S30V. Spyderco Ronin 2
-
I will admit, I've always just used whatever cheap Torx wrenches I have around the house to work on my knives. I got really, really tired of stripping heads. It seems like the cheap wrenches allow you to get sorta tight, then either the wrench (most of the time) or screw (it's happened to me) strip and then you cannot really get it tight again. So, a few weeks ago I contacted Spyderco and they sent me three brand new screws for my Yojimbo 2. I figured that would be an appropriate time to purchase some quality Torx wrenches. I did my research, and I found a brand called "Wiha". Perhaps some of you have heard of them, I had not. They're not cheap, but the are by far the best quality Torx wrenches of this size I've ever used. I actually worried I was over-tightening the screws this time. Nothing slipped, stripped, etc. All good to go! Wiha 36392 L-Wrench Set Anyone used these before?
-
I don't post much about knives here. I suppose it is a shame because overall I really enjoy knives just as much as I do firearms. Thus, I decided to post about my favorite knife of all time and my current EDC. Spyderco Yojimbo 2. It features of a wharncliffe blade profile and a Spyderco compression lock. I'll be honest, for years I discounted many of the Spyderco knives because I thought that the "compression lock" was the same as a linear lock. I couldn't be more wrong! Two things happened. I realized that no folding knife can take the place of a fixed blade. In other words, any/all locks will fail under the right circumstances. I watched this video. This, along with other research, gave me enough confidence that the compression locks are quite a bit better than linear locks. You can read more about different lock types offered by Spyderco here. I'm sorry, I just have a prejudice against linear locks. No offense implied to anyone that likes them. I present to thee...the Yojimbo 2! I'm not exaggerating when I state that it is my favorite knife ever. I just feels perfect in the hand and in the pocket. Just decided to post some pictures of it today since it has been on my mind. Spyderco showed off a "Yojumbo" a few days ago. I'm lusting.
-
Let’s tag him. @bubbiesdad
-
They used to be a “standard” that was of the better quality for a certain price point. I have seen them around $1,100, half that, and twice that. Now that there are so many, many options available, I wouldn’t consider them a “standard quality starter” anymore.
-
Avoid Corona!
-
There are who knows how many “new” viruses in the wild that have not jumped to humans. Bats carry lots of then. Viruses also mutate. Scientists like studying things.
-
I must be going to the wrong estate sales.
-
In no form do I intend for any of the following to support, promote, or insinuate any conspiratorial thinking or conspiracy theories regarding the origination source of COVID-19, henceforth referred to the virus. I do sincerely want the questions I ask answered, hopefully by people that have a better understanding of these things than I. I'm essentially basing the entirety of this conversation on the official WHO Timeline, found here. December 31st was when China reported to WHO that there was a cluster of pneumonia cases in Wuhan. Now, today we are showing February 17th as being the first confirmed death from the virus in the United States. What isn't completely clear is whether she contracted the virus domestically or internationally. For my argument, it doesn't matter. Here is the article I'm referring to. The difference in time between those days is roughly 48 days. Keep in mind December 31st was only 114 days ago. So within roughly 48 days the virus had spread to the United States in one form or fashion and killed someone. Within 114 days, we are "where we are now" with 2.6 million confirmed cases worldwide. So, here is my question. Imagine you are a new virus with relatively similar symptoms as dozens of other diseases. You are allowed to infect 100 people in any one area of the world. You do. How long do you think you would spread before being discovered as something new? That is sincerely something I do not know the answer to, but I suspect it could be a while. How many times have I or you went to the doctor to be tested for "the flu" and it came back negative? Instead, we're told "it is some virus going around, I've seen cases like this all month, you'll be better in a week and call if you aren't". To my knowledge, it isn't exactly common for each and every virus to be investigated. Rather, trends are noticed and at some point perhaps looked into. What I'm saying is that, sincerely, I'm impressed if any country in the world discovers a "new virus" within a month of "hitting the wild". Maybe it happens, maybe it doesn't. I don't really know. I don't pretend to understand the science of epidemiology. My personally, and this is 100% a guess, I'm thinking 2-4 months being my guess for how long something such as a new virus is noticed and discovered. I do find it odd that the Doctor that "discovered" the disease was an ophthalmologist, but I'll just go with that one. But what if it circulated in the wild for two, three, maybe four months before being discovered as "something new". Going off the official narrative, 114 days is enough time "until now", but what if it had a head-start of 90-120 days? What if it has already made a really, really good "round", spreading across the entire globe (with absolutely no restrictions in travel, social distancing, stay at home, etc) already with unconfirmed cases 10x, 100x, or even 1000x the confirmed cases we have now. We have been seeing cases rise seemingly exponentially, but couldn't that be directly correlated to tests becoming available at an exponential rate? A few groups have performed antibody testing on different populations, read that article here. If that article is true, 50x (their low-end estimate) the official number (currently at 842,624 in the United States) is 42,131,200. That's about 12% of the United States population. If you have a worldwide population of X, infected population of Y, and then start exponentially testing (starting at "0") at rate X, imagine what the graph for Y (infected population) will look like as you roll out testing? I'm not saying it isn't bad. It is. People are dying. But people die everyday. What I would be extremely interested in seeing would be an average number of daily deaths worldwide from any cause for 2018 and 2019 and then compare that to the average number of daily deaths worldwide from any cause during this pandemic. In other words, has this pandemic caused deaths as a function of being alive to increase? Or is it simply moving deaths as a function of being alive from one column to another? Can anyone offer more insight into any of this regarding methodologies, epidemiology, etc? Even though I'm very worried about the longterm ramifications of all of this, I find it very intriguing to experience something that up until now I believe all of us have only read about in history books.
-
I wasn’t implying that you were implying.
-
Interesting comparison - at least to me
GlockSpock replied to Trekbike's topic in Ammunition and Reloading
Hey! No need to make it personal.