GlockSpock

I've messed with websites for a pretty good amount of time now, and I can do most of what I'd like. I have a form via HTML here: http://pastebin.com/fBwK6aD1   I know I need to create a PHP file in the same directory titled "sendemail.php". However, I don't know exactly what to put in it. Any starters/suggestions/fixes?

Well...it can. Incendiary/tracer rounds are prohibited at a lot of ranges for this reason. I don't know anything about sparks and different jacketed bullets. I doubt that sparks would be of little concern because they probably are quite rare, but may be possible?

Thank you for this, will look through all of it sometime. It is very...insightful.

Just bought [5] of the LA Police Gear Operator Tactical Pants w/ Elastic Waistband. Never ordered pants on the internet before, nor anything from LAPG. I like the style, I just hope they fit correctly. Should be able to unload them on here though if I needed a different size I suppose. Thanks everyone!   I had already looked at most of the 5.11/Blackhawk/etc (various brand names), but I didn't even know about the LAPG ones. Reviews all seem to be great for them. I have to admit, being able to buy five pairs of those instead of roughly 2 from the other companies was certainly a plus!

  For what reasons?

I have usually just carried while wearing jeans or whatnot. However, for multiple reasons, I am not interested in purchasing some "tactical" style pants. Some but not all of the reasons are:   1) Khaki's should be a bit cooler than jeans 2) (Office) work attire 3) Lots of pockets 4) Lost some weight, need new pants   I have never owned nor worn any pants designed by one of these "tactical companies". So far I've looked at 5.11, and like the looks of their Covert Cargo Pants. However, I'd like some input from anyone that has or does wear any of these pants with theoretical "features" for gun carriers. Open to any maker, if made in US a ++, and they should look pretty well too. 

  LOL. Seriously enough, it is what I do. Not as it sounds, but more so I just budget every dime that I earn, and spend wisely. I don't feel the need to hide any purchases from my wife. I treat her kindly and treat her to nice things when I can. I also let her know that sometimes I'll spend some discretionary income on something I might like for myself. This may happen 2-3 times a year.    Be responsible, be loving, and be kind, and you don't have to hide anything. That is to say, you are doing your part, it is a two sided marriage:)

I've always liked some of the content on Arfcom, but have never joined because half the time you are reading about two folks insulting each others crap.   I'm glad I don't own any crap :pleased:

It's not cheap, but it works:   Dwarf your firearms and accessories/ammo purchases with bigger "honey" purchases   :hiding:

http://mykeyport.com

One of these:

Sorry, I had to! /Back to original purpose of this thread.

  I found that by searching for it, it is just interesting to me that they list their account as being in Cleveland, TN. Then again, I have never actually used GunBroker, so maybe there is a reason for that.

A few months ago when I went to TNGIC (TN Geographic Information Council) in Dixon, there was a student for 4H that had done a map showing hog damage by county for the entire state of TN. It was interesting; I had no idea there was such a problem with them until I saw that.

Here is mine: I bought it a couple weeks ago off Gunbroker. It's not a typical Glock, it's their Professional Line, noted as "GL23PL, or PL23 for short. It's now my daily carry. I like it because with the included holster, you are guaranteed not to shoot yourself if it discharges negligently because of where it is pointed when holstered. And trust me, it discharges negligently a lot. It's worth it though because not only do these discharges replace my CW badge (because I no longer have to display that I have a gun when everyone can just hear rounds popping off in the distance while I am walking), but it also looks different too when I have to toss it to the ground shortly before being tackled to the pavement by the LEO's I now know by name. Top of its class though. Top of its class!

I don't know the first thing about Civil War firearms, so I cannot contribute in any way to this thread, but what caught my attention was that the seller is listed as being in Cleveland, TN. I cannot think of who "PHCWarehouse would be in Cleveland. Any ideas anyone?

The least he could have done was use a HighLighter:   http://cli.ps/wn3CB

I've done some patent searching. I couldn't find anything remotely what I'm interested in, but Googling my idea showed me some stuff that is essentially the same idea, I just feel it can be done much more efficiently and an aspect of modularity could easily be added. Everyone loves modular things, right?

  So what you are essentially saying is (unless someone came up with a revolutionary idea, such as a way to fuel a car from used soda cans), skip the patent, go straight to prototyping and funding, and then start selling?

I have an idea of a gun related product that I would like to see manufactured but currently don't. Therefore, I have designed it myself. However, I am curious (intimidated) about patent information. I am far from revealing what the idea is. Honestly, I don't yet know if it is even something you could patent. In a nutshell, here is something I wonder about:   Lets say you have item A (in this case we will use a common everyday mug). Then you have item B (in this case we will use a carry handle from an AR-15). If you take A and combine it with B, can you patent it? This example is exactly what Joe (Bimmerfreak) has done with his BattleMug.   My conundrum (that I wonder about) is that my idea exists in a certain form on the market. Yet, my idea is exact specifications that would make item A work perfectly with items B and possibly C/D/Etc. Item A can already work with items B-Etc. However, my idea makes all of them play nice and efficiently.   I just wonder about things such as this, and whether they can be patented. Also, if it isn't something that can be patented, I suppose it could still be manufactured as long as it isn't violating other patents, right?   Ultimately, after my idea is "mine" and no one can steal it, I will probably use "Kickstarter" to propagate and fund it. There are a lot of specifics that I would like to discuss on here about it, but I still want it "mine" first. After that, perhaps I can gather input about what you all would like specifically. Hopefully this can work, but I have no experience in this field but have always wanted to "invent" something. Any input will be very greatly appreciated!

I'd say it would be ironic if say a, completely random of course, group of guys came in their and started confronting the male members of the church aggressively. If they do not fight back, at least they practice what they preach. If they fight back, we the group of guys call them out on fighting back when they speak against stand your ground.

My guess is a 10/22 Magnum?

My wife and I are considering getting some bikes. They will be mainly used for recreation/exercise. I think a pair of mountain bikes would probably serve us the best. We plan on riding them on the greenway in Cleveland, but would also like the ability to take them off-road (whereas you typically couldn't with a road bike).   Neither of us know much about the different brands and styles, but I am interested in purchasing something that is a good combination of price/durability. I want something that will last, but not if it costs $2000. Price range is probably $200-$400 each, and if something is available towards the lower end of that range, the better!   For each "hobby" there is typically a product that most can agree with is a well built classic standard. For reloading that might be the Lee Classic, for .22 rifles it might be the 10/22, for "sporting arms" it might be the AR-15. What would the class standard be for a mountain bike?

I was actually just looking at these myself. I've always heard great things about them. I just want them all!

  Ha! I was trying to figure out how a 50 MPH bicycle could win such a thing, but I understand now. Honestly though, I still think I'd take the one I linked to...I am going to request a price:)