GLOCKMEISTER

btw.... were not accepting orders for them, nor keeping a waiting list... first come first served. I personally wouldnt prepay for one because no dealer can gaurantee when of if they will see one any time soon... even us! They are that hard to get.

Since they have been relaesed I have begged borrowed and stole to get a dozen or so of them. I have sold every one I have gotten the same day I received it.... they are the hottest gun in the industry right now and are well worth it. As of yesterday I have about 950 thru mine without any probelm at all..... perfect!

We'd love to have her, we specialize in novice shooters. We have classes on Sat's and the cost is $75. If your interested let me know we usually stay booked at least a month in advance.

the way Kennedy has been voting lately.... who knows?

When it comes to terrorist captured on foriegn soil while trying to kill us.... you interrogate them in the field and use whatever means necessary to find out what they know... then shoot them while they are trying to escape.

the last one about Gitmo suprised the hell out of me.

if this happens Im writing in Mickey Mouse on a write in ballot!!!! Btw... I think this is just "press talk"... he's trying to get NY votes, thats all. He wont get a dime from the NRA if he does this and he knows it.

<CENTER>I know how to use guns; but I don't own one </CENTER>Q: Tell us about your gun collection, roughly how many you own, what your favorite make, model and caliber is, if any of them require a tax stamp? A: For a long time I used a lot of guns, including carrying a .45 as a pilot flying in combat over Vietnam. I know how to use guns. I don't own one now. <CENTER>Source: 2007 GOP YouTube debate in St. Petersburg, Florida Nov 28, 2007 </CENTER> <CENTER>Prosecute criminals, not citizens for gun ownership </CENTER>John McCain believes that the right of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms is a fundamental, individual Constitutional right. We have a responsibility to ensure that criminals who violate the law are prosecuted to the fullest, rather than restricting the rights of law abiding citizens. Gun control is a proven failure in fighting crime. Law abiding citizens should not be asked to give up their rights because of criminals--criminals who ignore gun control laws anyway. <CENTER>Source: Campaign website, www.johnmccain.com, "Issues" Sep 1, 2007 </CENTER> <CENTER>Don't hold gun manufacturers liable for crimes </CENTER>John McCain opposes backdoor attempts to restrict Second Amendment rights by holding gun manufacturers liable for crimes committed by third parties using a firearm, and has voted to protect gun manufacturers from such inappropriate liability aimed at bankrupting the entire gun industry. McCain says, "Neither justice nor domestic peace are served by holding the innocent responsible for the acts of the criminal." <CENTER>Source: Campaign website, www.johnmccain.com, "Issues" Sep 1, 2007 </CENTER> <CENTER>Opposes restrictions on assault weapons and ammunition types </CENTER> McCain opposes restrictions on so-called "assault rifles" and voted consistently against such bans. McCain opposes bans on the importation of certain types of ammunition magazines and has voted against such limitations. McCain believes that banning ammunition is just another way to undermine Second Amendment rights. He voted against an amendment that would have banned many of the most commonly used hunting cartridges on the spurious grounds that they were "armor-piercing." <CENTER>Source: Campaign website, www.johnmccain.com, "Issues" Sep 1, 2007 </CENTER> <CENTER>Calls for GOP "tolerance" of closing gun show loopholes </CENTER>A recall petition drive was started in June 2001 by the Arizona far right. The petition complained that McCain was disloyal to the President, especially in voting against his tax bill, and it also complained about his proposal to close the gun show loophole. One form of the petition accused him of backing "dishonest and treasonist" legislation. Several of the petitions were posted at gun shops. The NRA was particularly angry with him for its being included in his campaign finance reform bill, and for trying to tighten a loophole in the gun control laws. McCain himself was sufficiently concerned that he sent a 4-page, single-spaced letter to every GOP precinct leader in Arizona. He called for "greater tolerance" for Republicans "who occasionally dissent" from one or another majority position held by a party. He explained his vote against Bush's tax cut and talked about the need to build up national defense, about his work on the patients' bill of rights, and the gun show loophole. <CENTER>Source: Citizen McCain, by Elizabeth Drew, p. 78-79 May 7, 2002 </CENTER> <CENTER>Ban cheap guns; require safety locks; for gun show checks </CENTER>McCain favors outlawing cheaply made handguns called Saturday night specials, and favors mandating safety locks on certain guns. He said he is intrigued by new technology that electronically identifies a person handling a gun, allowing only the owner to fire it. McCain rallied Senate Republicans behind a Democratic measure requiring background checks at gun shows. <CENTER>Source: Scott Lindlaw, Associated Press Aug 17, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Supports ban on certain assault weapons </CENTER>McCain said he was open to voting for an assault weapon ban, depending on the details. <CENTER>Source: Los Angeles Times, “McCain Calls for Hearings†Aug 17, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Voted against Brady Bill & assault weapon ban </CENTER>McCain spoke generally of the need for some tighter gun controls on hardened criminals and children. In Congress, he pressured his colleagues to require background checks for buyers at guns shows, and he supported a requirement that trigger locks be sold with handguns. But the Senator opposed the two major gun-control measures of recent years, the 1994 ban on several types of assault weapons and the Brady Bill, which required a 5-day waiting period for handgun purchases. <CENTER>Source: Todd S. Purdum, New York Times, p. A14 Aug 17, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Guns are a problem, but so are violent web sites & videos </CENTER>If you want to take every gun in and dump it in the ocean, I’ll still take you to a Web site where it teaches children how to build a pipe bomb. And I’ll take you to a Web site where the worst kind of hate language that is terribly offensive to all of us exists. I can take you to a video game being sold to our children where the object of the game is to kill police. I understand the importance of weapons, but to define that as being the major cause [of youth violence], there’s a whole lot of causes. <CENTER>Source: Todd S. Purdum, New York Times, p. A14 Aug 17, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Punish criminals who abuse 2nd Amendment rights </CENTER>We need to focus on halting the spread of violent crime and punishing violent criminals who abuse their Second Amendment rights, while preserving those same rights for law-abiding Americans. <CENTER>Source: www.mccain2000.com/ “Press Releases†May 10, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Youth Violence Prevention Act restricts guns for kids </CENTER>McCain has introduced the “Youth Violence Prevention Act.†The legislation would: prevent juveniles from illegal access to weapons and punish those who would assist them in doing so prohibit juveniles who commit acts of gun violence from purchasing guns in the future sentence juveniles convicted of violent crimes under adult guidelines and punish juveniles who illegally carry or use handguns in schools. <CENTER>Source: www.mccain2000.com/ “Press Releases†May 10, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Repeal existing gun restrictions; penalize criminal use </CENTER> McCain supports the following principles regarding gun issues: Repeal federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens. Favor allowing citizens to carry concealed firearms. McCain says, “There are penalties for criminals who use firearms.†<CENTER>Source: Project Vote Smart, 1998, www.vote-smart.org Jul 2, 1998 </CENTER> <CENTER>Voted YES on prohibiting lawsuits against gun manufacturers. </CENTER>A bill to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. Voting YES would: Exempt lawsuits brought against individuals who knowingly transfer a firearm that will be used to commit a violent or drug-trafficking crime Exempt lawsuits against actions that result in death, physical injury or property damage due solely to a product defect Call for the dismissal of all qualified civil liability actions pending on the date of enactment by the court in which the action was brought Prohibit the manufacture, import, sale or delivery of armor piercing ammunition, and sets a minimum prison term of 15 years for violations Require all licensed importers, manufacturers and dealers who engage in the transfer of handguns to provide secure gun storage or safety devices <CENTER>Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill S 397 ; vote number 2005-219 on Jul 29, 2005 </CENTER> <CENTER>Voted YES on banning lawsuits against gun manufacturers for gun violence. </CENTER>Vote to pass a bill that would block certain civil lawsuits against manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers of firearms and ammunition, mainly those lawsuits aimed at making them liable for gun violence. In this bill, trade groups would also be protected The bill would call for the dismissal of pending lawsuits against the gun industry. The exception would be lawsuits regarding a defect in a weapon or ammunition. It also would provide a 10-year reauthorization of the assault weapons ban which is set to expire in September 2004. The bill would increase the penalties for gun-related violent or drug trafficking crimes which have not resulted in death, to a minimum of 15 years imprisonment. The bill calls for criminal background checks on all firearm transactions at gun shows where at least 75 guns are sold. Exemptions would be made available for dealers selling guns from their homes as well as members-only gun swaps and meets carried out by nonprofit hunting clubs. <CENTER>Reference: Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act; Bill S.1805/H.R.1036 ; vote number 2004-30 on Mar 2, 2004 </CENTER> <CENTER>Voted NO on background checks at gun shows. </CENTER>Require background checks on all firearm sales at gun shows. Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)50; N)50; VP decided YES <CENTER>Reference: Lautenberg Amdt #362; Bill S. 254 ; vote number 1999-134 on May 20, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Voted YES on more penalties for gun & drug violations. </CENTER>The Hatch amdt would increase mandatory penalties for the illegal transfer or use of firearms, fund additional drug case prosecutors, and require background check on purchasers at gun shows. [A YES vote supports stricter penalties]. Status: Amdt Agreed to Y)48; N)47; NV)5 <CENTER>Reference: Hatch Amendment #344; Bill S. 254 ; vote number 1999-118 on May 14, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Voted YES on loosening license & background checks at gun shows. </CENTER>Vote to table or kill a motion to require that all gun sales at gun shows be completed by federally licensed gun dealers. Also requires background checks to be completed on buyers and requires gun show promoters to register with the Treasury. <CENTER>Reference: Bill S.254 ; vote number 1999-111 on May 11, 1999 </CENTER> <CENTER>Voted YES on maintaining current law: guns sold without trigger locks. </CENTER>Vote to table [kill] an amendment to make it unlawful for gun dealers to sell handguns without providing trigger locks. Violation of the law would result in civil penalties, such as suspension or revocation of the dealer's license, or a fine. <CENTER>Reference: Bill S 2260 ; vote number 1998-216 on Jul 21, 1998 </CENTER> <CENTER>Ban gun registration & trigger lock law in Washington DC. </CENTER>McCain co-sponsored banning gun registration & trigger lock law in Washington DC Nothing in any provision of law shall authorize the Mayor, or any governmental authority of the District of Columbia, to prohibit possessing firearms by a person who is allowed to possess firearms under federal law. Denies the District any authority to enact laws or regulations that discourage or eliminate the private ownership or use of firearms. Repeals the ban on semiautomatic weapons. Repeals the District's registration requirement for possession of firearms. Repeals the trigger lock law. Maintains the current ban on the possession and control of a sawed-off shotgun, machine gun, or short-barreled rifle. Eliminates criminal penalties for possessing an unregistered firearm. Specifies exceptions to the prohibition against carrying concealed weapons in the District. <CENTER>Source: D.C. Personal Protection Act (H.R.1399/S.1001) 2007-S1001 on Mar 27, 2007 </CENTER> <CENTER> </CENTER><CENTER> </CENTER>

1st of all, the NRA is really the only way to go to support gun rights, they are the only ones really doing anything on a National Level... that said we sure could use some help here in Tennessee. I'm a member, have been and plan on always being. Now on the election, no gun owner, nor real American in their right mind should vote for Obama... period... He has no positive qualities to fill the position at all, and no record to show what little he has done. On the other side McCain is the only option out there, btw ... What legislation and exactly when has Mccain voted against gun owners?

hey, I got a shipment of them coming in this week.... 1st come 1st served.

and caked on rust.... we cleaned lots of them for several customers that moved up here afterward.

all I can say is if there are warrants being served late at night or early in the morning there is usually a reason for it, and its usually not handled by a podunked Dept.

actually McCain isnt that bad on gun control, when it matters he votes with gun owners. If Obama gets elected....gunowners are screwed and I'll sell the Hell out of guns till they dry up... and are gone.

You basically have two very liberal Judges that will have to retire if they dont die on the bench in hte next 4-8 years... 1 for sure. Judge John Paul Stevens.... 88 years old. Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg... 75 years old

what you guys better be thinking about is the Supreme Court Judges that Obama would replace. Also what executive orders he could sign pertaining to guns that could change the industry, without a vote of congress. Its all about voting against Obama at this point.

+1 Night sights are a must, lasers are useless in a real life Self Defense Combat situation...they are simply toys for the cat. Tactical light is a plus if you train with it. Folks lets be real, most of the situation where you will need a handgun for self defense will take place at night. Its imperative you have a complete sight picture for your first accurately placed shots. Night Sights are a must to achieve this. After that you should have muzzle flash that will limit your vision very briefly, so those first shots count. You should also be moving at this point because you have given away your position, a trained individual will shoot back toward your muzzle flash. What I recommend is repetitive training in extreme low light situations, or flashing lights... whatever a probable situation might dictate. If you are going to have a flashlight available at all times, then train with it... but don't become dependant on it. In short I'm not depending my life on any "device" that can be "turned off" or can be "battery dead"... or can be easily knocked off or covered up. Training is the most important thaing you can do.

what laws havent been voted on yet?

didnt know they made them in a handgun... better hold on!!!

Any vote for the Dem ticket is a vote against America, if they win you can expect the entrance of pure socialism. The things they want to do about health care in itself scare me to death. Give the government control ... please? If you want to see how that would work go and visit a Veterans Hospital... thats Government controlled health care at its finest. I'm voting for McCain, and I'll hold my nose while I do it... I really think a DEM in the oval office would kill this country. Hopefully McCain will pick a good vp candidate, if he goes Romney I think all may be lost. The smart pick would probably be Charlie Crist of Florida, that is if he's still popular down there. That would put to bed carrying that state at the last minute like we've been worried about in the past.

if you do, dont tell anyone about it... if you do you will have new friends coming in to shoot that you have never met.

So what do we do, write every one of them and inform them that 300,000 permit holders were now choosing not to do business with their establishments?

Thats nothing... I get calls 2-3 times a day asking ... "Do you guys sell guns"????

btw.... if you guy's non arguments are valid, then that would mean all Highway Interstates are technically under control of the U.S. Dept Of Transportation Federal Highway Administration... so all the Interstates would be "federal property" meaning you couldnt carry/transport a firearm on them either??? Just trying to get you guys to see this from my side...

So basically, like I said State and Local laws apply, and are enforced by State and Local Law Enforcement officers. See... ( These state and local laws and ordinances are enforced by those state and local enforcement agencies established and authorized for that purpose. Now on actual Dam premises, which is btw real federal property, which also BTW is what the Army is calling the "Water Resources Development Project"... in civilian terms we call it... the Damned DAM! I wouldn't carry. So guys, instead of looking up 8 year old stuff on the web, pick up the phone and call TWRA, USCG, and USACOE. Me, I have called all of them and also have Written documentation provided by the appropriate Law Enforcment Agency that would be involved in effecting any arrest on these waterways.... so in short, Im carrying, period!

SEC 327.6 SAY THIS.... 327.26 State and local laws. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this part or by Federal law or regulation, state and local laws and ordinances shall apply on project lands and waters. This includes, but is not limited to, state and local laws and ordinances governing: (1) Operation and use of motor vehicles, vessels, and aircraft; (2) Hunting, fishing and trapping; (3) Use or possession of firearms or other weapons; (4) Civil disobedience and criminal acts; (5) Littering, sanitation and pollution; and (6) Alcohol or other controlled substances.