TripleDigitRide

Not going to happen. This farce is going to have to come down to the jury to decide. Way too much politics here for the judge to do the right thing. As much of a no-brainer as this appears to be, it's still quite scary and sad that there's always the possibility of a jury finding him guilty. Did all of the State's witnesses happen to pile out of the same Chevette, right there in the middle of the court room?

How do these "witnesses" get away with blatantly lying while under oath?

Welcome to TGO, neighbor. Off Oakland Road here.

Yes.

DOJ can, of course, do whatever they want--and they do--but the FBI already had a handful of SAs down in Sanford to hunt for evidence of racial motive, and they came up empty. Andrew @LawSelfDefense Facebook: Law of Self Defense Obviously the FBI doesn't have anything on some of TGO's finest, because they managed to find plenty of racial motive, without any evidence, from the comfy of their easy chair.

Naw, the defense is prepared. The fact that a citizen is taking a proactive role in keeping the neighborhood safer is hardly the the most damaging information they prosecution could bring to the table. This is especially true now that the jury has heard about the rash of crime in the neighborhood.

Thank you again for the updates.

Amazing!

The Onion is one of my favorite satire websites. They're not as good as they once were, but they do post some funny stuff from time to time.

Amen! We are at least as shady as they are.

Scumbag should suffer.

Yes, you understood correctly. With that being said, there are some who wouldn't care if the police planted evidence. Afterall, if Zimmerman hadn't stepped foot out of his vehicle, there would've not been a reason for evidence.

:shake: First of all, not all Hispanics are Mexicans and not all Hispanics eat Tacos. My parents are Dominican (Dominican Republic, you know that little country that won the WBC this year) and we eat other things and tortillas are not in our diet. There's no such thing as "white-Hispanic", there's Hispanic that has a white skin complexion or you can say what their nationality background is: Mexican, Puerto Rican, Dominican, etc.. And not every spanish speaker is Mexican or speaks Mexican, it's "Spanish". :hat: And not all non-taco eating Hispanics know tongue-in-cheek when they read it.

I've done read about 5 different versions ofthat call. The word "Punk" is most consistent, so punk it is! Dave S No worries. Zimmerman probably had a mouth full of taco when he made the call, so it wouldn't be difficult to misunderstand the difference between punk and coon.

I guess I found the right one now. Zman says "F****** Coon" and not punk. Damn...just Damn!!! Dave S I'm pretty sure the "coon" myth was debunked as soon as the first race-baiter brought it up. If he had said that, the prosecution would have been all over that right out of the gate.

It looks like they have decided against enforcing the law. Also, based on the explanation I read, this law has nothing to do with regular mixed drinks that are mixed on demand. This law only prevents bars and restaurants from making their own recipes that may sit on the shelf for days or weeks.

Based on your overview, the dispatcher's testimony shed some light into Zimmerman's state of mind during the incident. If, as a trained professional, he didn't get the impression that Zimmerman was overly angry, who am I to argue? I am guilty of using what many would probably consider too much foul language. The "F" word is one of my favorites. While I use it for many different occasions, you can (or should be able to) clearly tell my state of mind. If I am as angry as many would like us to believe Zimmerman was, the "F" word is most likely going to be preceded and/or followed by a few more four letter words. In fairness, my girlfriend of 8 years continues to sometimes have a difficult time noticing the difference. Thanks again for the updates.

When will you cover the witness testimony?

Interesting.

I see what you're saying there. So, if I understand correctly, in the court's eyes, it's okay for him to lie, as long as he doesn't take the stand in his own defense?

I think I've said before that my opinion and the court of law are two separate things. I don't know why we can't get past that. Because some of us are trying to focus on the evidence while discussing this COURT case. Others insist on discussing their feelings and what they would or wouldn't have done in the situation. At this point, I am doing my best to put myself in the shoes of the jury. The jury is told to base their decisions on the law and evidence presented to them. That's exactly what I'd like them to do if I were in Zimmerman's position. As long as you continue to push opinion of guilt based on feelings, I'm going to continue to push my opinion based on evidence and the law.

No sir; but neither you nor I are on trial right now. Not a very good example Sir! Dave S But you never know if or when it could happen. If it were to happen, you can bet they'd dig up and publicize every ounce of dirty laundry we have.

They aren't local, but Whittaker's seems to get more of them than anyone else. They will ship, but the competition to get them is fierce.

I beleive very little he says. He's been caught in too many lies now. I know, I know...prove it.... DiaS All of us have lied more than once. Does that make us guilty of murder?

By allowing Snowden to leave the country, China just sent a strongly worded F You in response to the .govs strongly worded messages demanding Snowden's return. I love seeing Jay Carney act like a tough guy.