nightrunner

That is beautiful! I love it.

Racking my brain, and the closest I can come up with is the Magpul FMG 9. It used Glock mags and was full auto but made by Magpul. Only a prototype made though not regular production. And only 9mm.

It most likely happened and that is a recreation of the scene. More than likely he was in the drivers seat anyways but they staged it on the passengers side to be more visible and easier to photograph

Is he a Class 3 dealer or LE/MIL? If not, he doesn't have a full auto Glock of any kind, legally. I'm guessing it either isn't a Glock, isn't full auto, or is a conversion. Or a combination of those three. Glock has never made a shoulder fired weapon of any kind. Just pistols and accessories and knives and shovels. I'm curious too, maybe you'll find out when you go shooting with him.

The movie Act of Valor, the acting was done by actual Navy SEALS supposedly. I believe it, the dialogue scenes weren't as smooth as most Hollywood movies, but the fight scenes were amazing. Anyways, if you pay attention in that movie, not one time did they go full auto with their M4s. It was always semi auto, make your shots count. It is amazing to see how efficient they are at what they do.

My thoughts exactly. Short barrel shotguns, short barrel rifles, and suppressors should not be on the registry. Short barrel shotguns and rifles were used in the early days of cartridge fired weapons because they were more powerful than any handgun cartridge available at the time and concealable. But now we have things like the S&W 500 and 460, .45/70 revolvers, ar and ak pistols, etc. that are more powerful than a lot of rifles. There is no reason to not have current manufacture machine guns available to the general public provided you have a tax stamp. Heck, they are federally registered, isn't that what they want anyways? Destructive devices I am not too familiar with.

I didn't see any details about the shoulder fired version... (Must refrain from making comment about plasma rifle in 40 watt range...)

If Colt sold a new Python, it might be a nice gun just like a new manufacture S&W Classic, but it won't be hand fitted like the old ones, doubtful it would have the famous Colt Royal Blue finish either. And a lot of people would pay for it to say Python on the barrel. It would be similar to most being perfectly happy with your standard S&W 686, but some seek out an old pinned and recessed Model 27.

I would love it if we could own new manufacture machine guns both US manufacture and imported. I don't anticipate nor expect them to be removed from NFA status, but at least make them available without an exorbitant price tag. However, those that do own the registered machine guns now have so much invested in them, that they would fight any legislation to make new ones available which would make theirs near worthless. I know there would be many more tax stamps applied for if they were legal.

What kind of budget? There are some chassis' that can get quite pricey. Might take a look at the new Magpul Hunter 700 chassis

The majority of the money (profit) goes to the assembler aka manufacturer not the individual parts suppliers. I used to work at Nissan in the quality dept. I was told on more than one occasion that it costs approximately $8,000 to build an Altima. They sell for mid-20s up to around $30k. That's a pretty high percentage of profit going back overseas. I buy according to where the company is based at. Not where they buy some of their parts. Don't kid yourself, Toyota, Nissan, etc would not be using American made parts if it wasn't financially benefitial to do so. They manufacture them here to save on importing costs when there is a huge automotive market in the US.

Well yall can say what you want about me but I'm not going to pay my hard earned money for a Japanese or any foreign country's vehicle when I can get what I need from an American companies product. I will admit I am a die hard GM guy and I'd buy a Ford before I'd buy a Toyota any day.

Then sell it for 1000% profit. Just say it's what Chris Costa used to hunt with.

I don't own a suppressor but I have been researching them as I plan to get one eventually. The Silencerco Saker is at the top of my list.

I already use area code on everything because I moved from a 931 area code in Manchester to a 615 area code in Smyrna. I'm used to it. Like was already said, rarely does anybody dial numbers anymore, everything is in a contact list.

Next up is .308 AP. Mark my words.

Amen. The whole, not volunteering to take a round makes it adequate, argument is the dumbest thing ever. Nobody in their right mind wants to get shot but some calibers are better for certain applications than others.

Ruger made a lever gun before in .44mag. The 96/44. It was so fugly nobody bought it. A lever action carbine is one of those things that really needs to be traditional to be successful.

Isn't teflon coating mostly what got Black Talons banned? Nothing is new under the sun.

I meant that in no reference to you, but to the gun. Look at that grip, that's ridiculously wide. The article I saw/read on it said that was a one-off custom made by Arsenal to show off their abilities.

10 lbs of stupid in a 5 lb sack

Perfect now.

Not an issue for me, just relaying feedback.

On mobile, I am seeing this instead now. Error: Could not load template 'chatMobileLink' from group 'ipchat'

I am on mobile and the red square is there for me.