quietguy

I believe that Sig fulfills most US contracts through its domestic manufacturing facilities. If what I have been told is true, only some of the raw materials are imported.

If you find the right buyer, you could probably get $550 or so out of it. But you would have to find the right buyer. You are probably looking at getting in the $450 and $500 range. Shoulder holsters don't have a huge following, and the IWB is probably a write-off. I would figure $10 to $15 each on the mags. If it were mine, I would start out asking $600, but be prepared to go lower. Never know if you can get lucky.

Take a look at the Sig C3. It is essentially the same idea as the Colt CCO (commander slide on a officer frame). Lightweight, easy to conceal, accurate, and fun to shoot.

These discussions (as one who recently allowed himself to get dragged into a couple) never end well. Only thing I would add is that a 9mm may expand, but a .45 won't get smaller.

If only you could get someone familiar with the area to respond. Everyone knows that Reelfoot is eat up with Black Panthers. I think you probably just got the Chamber of Commerce description of the area.

Most of the gun shops around either have a class, or a couple of instructors that they can refer you to. You might check with Gun City, as their classes seem to be slow to fill. Their instructors are TBI. Not recommending the store, but the class is fine.

I don't have any experience with the 4", but I really like the 5" PD. I like the balance, and it is a great shooter. Time will tell, but I think that Sig and S&W have the external extractors figured out. I still prefer an internal extractor, but have not had any issues with this latest generation of externals.

I have never met the man, but do know a couple people in his administration. His primary job in this instance was to formally request federal assistance, and that was done as quickly as the necessary information was gathered. Did everything go as expeditiously and smoothly as possible? Probably not. With the amount of damage statewide, and the still lingering threat of significant flooding throughout the state, specifically along the Mississippi, everyone appears to be stretched thin. I also don't disagree with most of your analysis of the "snozz" (got a chuckle out of that one), and feel similarly in many respects. I don't know what the man's future political ambitions are, and you may very well be correct. I just feel that having a delegation going around to survey storm damage distracts from the efforts of those involved in response. It might make a few people feel better, but a lot of people can be helped in the time it takes to coordinate and plan something like that. All too often, those trips are made to grandstand in front of the media.

No, I am not.

Sorry, but I am dismantling your arguments out of order. Please understand. Who else would you have him contact? I am not an apologist for anyone, but just trying to interject a little common sense into the discussion. Tennessee was hit hard by these storms, and across a broad range of communities. You can't possibly expect one person to visit each community that incurred damage.

When you aren't facing widespread destruction, it is much easier to focus on specific communities.

So somehow visiting the hardest hit areas shows a lack of these qualities?

Unfortunately, in these circumstances no one will feel properly served. I can assure you that the Governor has been in contact with the Senators and Representatives of each affected district If you Reps have done their jobs, they have been in contact with your local administration and public safety officials. . He has spent the days since the storm visiting the areas most hard hit, and instructed his staff to do whatever is necessary to assist in any possible way. If you feel that your area has not been properly responded to, I would urge you to contact either your local representation (city or county mayor) or Representative or Senator.

While I think there are some small differences, new Sig P220 Compact is essentially the old P245. Same slide as the P220 Carry, with a smaller grip. Personally, I like the Sig 1911 C3, but it is a little more expensive than the options you listed. It is very similar to the old Colt CCO. Of those you listed, I had a G30 that I really liked. The G36 just didn't feel right in my hand. The M&P feels really nice, but I don't have any first hand experience with them. I really like the Kahr's, but haven't shot one of their 45s.

Your premise is correct, but telecom fiber isn't hollow. It does have multiple layers of cladding to prevent outside light, or bleeding from other stands. I am personally interested to see how this experiment works. Since you posted this, I have experimented a little with my FO shotgun sight. It appears that it is most effective when light enters from the top of the FO rod, and tends to wash out when pointed directly at a light source. The only potential issue I see is that the FO may filter the light that gets to the glow paint to the point that it its effective.

I really liked "The Saint", but I would have to vote for Tombstone.

I will have to check out Steamboat Bills. We used to catch a few here and there when we were kids. Never enough to cook, but they do make great bait. Channel cats love 'em.

I want to apologize to all of those who read this thread. I never should have stooped to the level of personal attacks, and have sent a PM to the OP expressing my regret. The results are all too predictable, and I should have seen it coming.

Congrats. IMHO, the G30 is one of the best concealed carry options available. Hard to beat 10+1 rounds of .45ACP in that small a package.

Maybe I am just lucky, or just take additional care when I choose to carry a striker-fired firearm. Generally, it is people (like yourself) who don't understand or are willing to admit and appreciate the design limitations of their firearms that end up on the wrong end of an AD/ND.

I would suggest that you contact the legal counsel for TDOC. From my conversations with legislators, their intent is that anyone granted LEO/PO status should be POST certified. There may be a long-standing department policy that is contrary to this intent. Regarding actions under a HCP, this could present some interesting legal questions. I am not an attorney, and would not presume to issue legal advice or opinion. I wouldn't what to speculate, but I could see potential scenarios where your responsibilities as an "agent of the State" contradict/coincide with your rights has a HCP holder.

First, I am done commenting on any thread that has anything to do with Glocks. It is crazy how these things devolve, and it is a shame that we can't have a constructive conversation. I apologize to the OP. My comments lead to the derailing of your thread, and I will try my best to not let this happen again. I can assure you that this was not my intention. I have re-read my post, and I in no way tried to tell anyone how to carry their gun. I simply pointed out there are potential issues that can arise with this type of firearm, that you have to take additional care to prevent these from resulting in a ND/AD, and that other firearms designs (and aftermarket add-ons as requested by the OP) address these potential problems. I don't care what you carry, or how you carry it, as long as it doesn't endanger me or my family. I am not a Glock fan, but don't really consider myself a fan of any particular manufacturer. I have had Glock's, Sig's, Kimber's, Colt's, Kahr's, Beretta's, and HK's (and probably a few more) that have had 1,000s of trouble free rounds. All are great designs, and have their benefits and limitations. Taken as a whole, Glocks are no better or no worse than any other reputable firearm manufacturer. The OP asked about a device that may eliminate/mitigate one of the limitations of the Glock designs, and I simply offered my opinion about where such a device may be beneficial. As stated previously, I have owned and carried Glocks. The Glock 30 may be one of the best CC platforms ever designed. 10+1 rounds of .45ACP is a lot of firepower in a pretty small package. My main complaint with the Glock is the grip angle, not their over-marketed and under-engineered safety considerations. I just don't shoot them as well in "real life" (rapid fire, simulated stress, multiple target) situations as I do others. This is why I don't own one now, not because I feel they are unsafe.

You Glock types are so easily riled. I will never understand the reluctance to add an additional precaution. Well, I wouldn't single out Glocks. I think there is a huge difference though when comparing to a revolver, DAO or DA/SA. When you have a hammer on the firearm, you have an easy way to verify that nothing is impacting the trigger when holstering. Also, the trigger pull is generally greater than 5 or 5.5 lbs on a revolver or DA/SA. I have a Kahr that I occasionally carry, and have owned and carried Glocks in the past. I don't think they are inherently unsafe, you just have to be even more vigilant with these types of weapons. There is no doubt that nearly all AD/NDs are caused by careless handling or complacency, especially with modern arms.

Looks like a good addition to any Glock, but I can't personally vouch for the product. Most AD/NDs with striker-fired arms (at least from the reports I have seen) tend to occur either when holstering the weapon or field-stripping. One of these devices would eliminate one of those concerns - holstering. You could activate the thumb safety when holstering, and deactivate it once the trigger is covered. For me, holstering is one of the critical flaws of most striker-fired handguns. When you have a hammer, you can rest your thumb on the hammer as you holster the weapon. If anything catches the trigger, you will know it.

Pick up a Crossbreed or Comp-Tac for IWB. IMHO, they are the best bang for the buck. I have a Crossbreed for the P30. While not a perfect fit for any one, it fits my P2kSK, USP45, and 45C well enough to carry. The profile is essentially the same, and belt tension makes up for the thickness differences. For OWB, I would look for something that rides pretty high and tucks into your body.